[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC

erin.adams at lp.org erin.adams at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 10:50:23 EDT 2018


Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to be 
Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention of 
doing that.


On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
> Ms. Adams,
> 
> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than I've
> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
> actually being silenced.
> 
> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering questions
> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments.  Your response
> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then complained
> about the tone of the debate.
> 
> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you. On
> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the minority
> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the losing
> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom. The
> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in cages,
> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I will
> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do also,
> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
> 
> JBH
> 
> 
> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true that "
>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>  at this point except live with it the best we can for two years." and
>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in an
>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up folks,
>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you will
>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be dismissed
>> and silenced.
>> 
>> 
>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>> Caryn Ann,
>>> 
>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went awry.
>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years.  We
>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the delegates and
>>> made effective immediately.
>>> 
>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot thread
>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>> votes on the motion.
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Sam Goldstein
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>> 
>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>> Oh my goodness.  I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>    I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am supposed 
>>>> to NOT
>>>>    yell it from the rooftops?  What Party am I in again?
>>>> 
>>>>    On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
>>>>    <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>      Agreed, to a point.  At some time, preaching to the choir 
>>>> becomes
>>>>      counter productive.  As noted earlier, we are all aware that it
>>>>      sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will make
>>>>      everyone happy immediately.  We all want to fix it, and fix it
>>>>      yesterday.  I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, and 
>>>> yours.
>>>>      Bring it up once a week.  Absolutely.  Don't bring it up 5 
>>>> times a
>>>>      day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments takes 
>>>> away
>>>>      time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party in 
>>>> other
>>>>      ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up 
>>>> continually
>>>>      on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.  Let's 
>>>> move
>>>>      on and FIX IT.
>>>>      Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let this crap
>>>>      happen again.
>>>>      John Phillips
>>>>      Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>      Cell 217-412-5973
>>>> 
>>>>    On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>      Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing to be 
>>>> quiet
>>>>      about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a week 
>>>> until
>>>>      solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening again.
>>>>      Respectfully,
>>>>      Craig Bowden
>>>>      Region 1 Alternate
>>>>      On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>      I respectfully decline.
>>>>         On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>      <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>           Caryn Ann,
>>>>           Just shut up about this already!
>>>>           Respectfully,
>>>>           ---
>>>>           Sam Goldstein
>>>>           Libertarian National Committee
>>>>           317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>         On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>         PS:  Before this vote ends, I am going to put something 
>>>> together
>>>>      to try
>>>>            to convince you that this is actually one of the worst 
>>>> ways to
>>>>         solve.
>>>>            My first issue - that of steering the delegates down that 
>>>> road
>>>>      with
>>>>            at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any way 
>>>> that we
>>>>      would
>>>>            ever do.  If it were up to me, I would punt it all back 
>>>> to the
>>>>            delegates.
>>>>            The second issue - of how to handle this situation with 
>>>> the JC
>>>>      -
>>>>         well
>>>>            we are trying to solve it now and I think we are solving 
>>>> it
>>>>      wrong
>>>>         both
>>>>            ethically and procedurally.
>>>>            And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR come 
>>>> into
>>>>      conflict.
>>>>            Rules are tools.  Just because a rule allows something 
>>>> doesn't
>>>>      mean
>>>>         it
>>>>            is right, and this is probably why the first issue is 
>>>> sticking
>>>>      in my
>>>>            craw so badly.  It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to change 
>>>> the
>>>>      rules of
>>>>         an
>>>>            election mid-way.  There is a huge difference between 
>>>> majority
>>>>      and
>>>>            plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it 
>>>> effects the
>>>>      way
>>>>         they
>>>>            campaign.  We treated them and their efforts as pawns, 
>>>> and it
>>>>      isn't
>>>>            right.
>>>>            I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about this
>>>>      already.
>>>>            Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is one of
>>>>      them.
>>>>         Just
>>>>            like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last term.
>>>>            The only way we are going to learn as an organization is 
>>>> if
>>>>      this is
>>>>         a
>>>>            bit painful.  And in so doing we will model over-the-top
>>>>      integrity
>>>>         to
>>>>            our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>            <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>            ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get 
>>>> the
>>>>            state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds 
>>>> of
>>>>         delegates
>>>>            didn't even vote in the two races because we put them off 
>>>> so
>>>>      long.
>>>>         In
>>>>            the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes in 
>>>> the
>>>>      At-Large
>>>>         and
>>>>            JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by those 
>>>> who
>>>>      stay and
>>>>            vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The combination of
>>>>      voting
>>>>            methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left us in 
>>>> a
>>>>      bad
>>>>            place.===
>>>>            You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now are 
>>>> surprised
>>>>      we
>>>>         got
>>>>            ran over?
>>>>            But it is more than that.  The delegates were led to make 
>>>> a
>>>>      decision
>>>>         in
>>>>            a certain direction.  There WERE other options.  Whether 
>>>> or
>>>>      not one
>>>>            agrees with the voting methodology, it is the methodology 
>>>> and
>>>>      its
>>>>            intent was to use approval voting to show approval and we
>>>>      turned it
>>>>         on
>>>>            its head.  Why weren't the delegates given other options?
>>>>            ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and 
>>>> complain.
>>>>      As far
>>>>         as
>>>>            actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>            Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
>>>>      members or
>>>>         us
>>>>            filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion - 
>>>> are
>>>>      even
>>>>         more
>>>>            violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>            Are they all?  I don't think so. And I do think my very 
>>>> real
>>>>         complaint
>>>>            of how the delegates were steered in a certain direction 
>>>> is
>>>>      being
>>>>            ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>            ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of 
>>>> legality:
>>>>      the
>>>>            delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
>>>>      candidates
>>>>         and
>>>>            the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's also 
>>>> no
>>>>      doubt in
>>>>         my
>>>>            mind that had they been asked they would have done the 
>>>> same
>>>>      for the
>>>>         JC.
>>>>            A room of several hundred Libertarians were not coerced 
>>>> into
>>>>      doing
>>>>         that
>>>>            - they went with what Nick suggested because that's what 
>>>> they
>>>>      wanted
>>>>         to
>>>>            do. He just told them how.===
>>>>            And that is where the dispute is.  Most of the people 
>>>> there
>>>>      trusted
>>>>         us
>>>>            (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of the 
>>>> LNC
>>>>      and this
>>>>            isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what they
>>>>      wanted.
>>>>         They
>>>>            were presented with two choices in which they were led 
>>>> down a
>>>>            particular path.  You are an attorney Joe, you know 
>>>> exactly
>>>>      what I
>>>>         am
>>>>            getting at here.
>>>>            Do you really think that if they were offered a majority
>>>>      rising vote
>>>>         on
>>>>            the spot to choose between options they would not have 
>>>> taken
>>>>      that?
>>>>         It
>>>>            never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any other
>>>>      options.  It
>>>>            didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed in 
>>>> this
>>>>      stuff.
>>>>         It
>>>>            stinks.  If a government acted this way we would be all
>>>>      lathered up.
>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>            <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>              I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get 
>>>> the
>>>>              state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that 
>>>> hundreds of
>>>>              delegates didn't even vote in the two races because we 
>>>> put
>>>>      them
>>>>         off
>>>>              so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states didn't 
>>>> cast
>>>>      votes in
>>>>              the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - elections 
>>>> are
>>>>      won by
>>>>              those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make it 
>>>> hard. The
>>>>              combination of voting methodology, tabulation method, 
>>>> and
>>>>         scheduling
>>>>              left us in a bad place.
>>>>              All that said, I don't want to just be angry and 
>>>> complain.
>>>>      As far
>>>>         as
>>>>              actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>              Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all 
>>>> Party
>>>>      members
>>>>         or
>>>>              us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in 
>>>> motion -
>>>>      are
>>>>         even
>>>>              more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>              I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue that 
>>>> every JC
>>>>              candidate was disapproved and that it should sit empty 
>>>> until
>>>>      2022.
>>>>              The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of 
>>>> legality:
>>>>      the
>>>>              delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
>>>>      candidates
>>>>              and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's 
>>>> also
>>>>      no
>>>>              doubt in my mind that had they been asked they would 
>>>> have
>>>>      done the
>>>>              same for the JC. A room of several hundred Libertarians 
>>>> were
>>>>      not
>>>>              coerced into doing that - they went with what Nick 
>>>> suggested
>>>>         because
>>>>              that's what they wanted to do. He just told them how. 
>>>> They
>>>>      didn't
>>>>              want the LNC fighting over who would fill the seats if 
>>>> they
>>>>      were
>>>>              left vacant.
>>>>              I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want to 
>>>> write
>>>>      this to
>>>>              emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or sweeping
>>>>      anything
>>>>              blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how we do
>>>>      elections
>>>>         will
>>>>              be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>              JBH
>>>>              On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>      wrote:
>>>>              Suspension of the rules has to be specific and there is 
>>>> no
>>>>      way
>>>>              around
>>>>                 the fact that we used the number 5 over and over.
>>>>                 This is taking things to an even deeper level of
>>>>      improper.  I
>>>>              object to
>>>>                 the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the 
>>>> delegates
>>>>      made an
>>>>                 independent choice and now to just infer this upon 
>>>> that
>>>>      is two
>>>>              bridges
>>>>                 too far.
>>>>                 This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of 
>>>> sweeping it
>>>>      under
>>>>              the rug.
>>>>                 It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole 
>>>> situation
>>>>      is
>>>>         being
>>>>              taken.
>>>>                 There are people looking at us and seeing nothing
>>>>      different
>>>>         than
>>>>              the
>>>>                 government we wish to reform.
>>>>                 There was a controversial election and at least one 
>>>> state
>>>>      chair
>>>>              and
>>>>                 candidate has been asking for the state by state 
>>>> rallies
>>>>      with
>>>>         no
>>>>              time
>>>>                 frame given him.
>>>>                 The whole thing was an affront to people expecting 
>>>> an
>>>>      entirely
>>>>                 different thing when they ran.  I will not be 
>>>> sanguine
>>>>      about
>>>>         it.
>>>>                 On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>                   <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>                   This point did come up immediately after 
>>>> adjournment,
>>>>      while
>>>>           Nick
>>>>                was
>>>>                   still at the mic. I don't recall who brought it 
>>>> up, but
>>>>      the
>>>>                statement
>>>>                   was made that it would follow the same procedure 
>>>> as
>>>>      At-Large
>>>>           at
>>>>                that
>>>>                   point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>                   No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>                   Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>                   Region 7 Representative
>>>>                   On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos 
>>>> via
>>>>           Lnc-business
>>>>                   <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>                        Joshua they were not given a choice on this. 
>>>> The
>>>>      JC
>>>>           never
>>>>                came
>>>>                     up.
>>>>                        On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>                <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>                      I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given 
>>>> the
>>>>      choice
>>>>         at
>>>>                      convention
>>>>                      just a few short days ago, I believe we should
>>>>      respect
>>>>         that
>>>>                      decision.
>>>>                      Thanks,
>>>>                      Joshua D. Smith
>>>>                      On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>      Lnc-business
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>                      > We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are 
>>>> due
>>>>      to the
>>>>                      LNC-Business
>>>>                      >    list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm 
>>>> Pacific
>>>>      time.
>>>>                 Co-Sponsors:
>>>>                      >    Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced, 
>>>> Van
>>>>      Horn
>>>>                 Motion:
>>>>                      Move
>>>>                      > that
>>>>                      >    the Libertarian National Committee 
>>>> acknowledge
>>>>      the
>>>>                 election of
>>>>                      the
>>>>                      >    following to the Judicial Committee for a
>>>>      four-year
>>>>            term:
>>>>                 D.
>>>>                      Frank
>>>>                      >    Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, 
>>>> Ruth
>>>>      Bennett,
>>>>            Geoff
>>>>                      Neale,
>>>>                      > Jim
>>>>                      >    Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep 
>>>> track
>>>>      of
>>>>         the
>>>>                      Secretary's
>>>>                      >    manual tally of votes here:
>>>>                     [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                          >    --
>>>>                          >    --
>>>>                          >    In Liberty,
>>>>                          >    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>                          >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian
>>>>      National
>>>>                Committee
>>>>                          (Alaska,
>>>>                          >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, 
>>>> Montana,
>>>>           Utah,
>>>>                Wyoming,
>>>>                          > Washington)
>>>>                          >    - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                          >    Communications Director, 
>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>      Party of
>>>>                Colorado
>>>>                          >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation 
>>>> Committee
>>>>                          >    A haiku to the Statement of 
>>>> Principles:
>>>>                          >    We defend your rights
>>>>                          >    And oppose the use of force
>>>>                          >    Taxation is theft
>>>>                          >
>>>>                          > References
>>>>                          >
>>>>                          >    1. [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>      m/lncvoting
>>>>                          >    2. mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                          >    3. [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>      ado.org/
>>>>                        --
>>>>                        --
>>>>                        In Liberty,
>>>>                        Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>                        Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>      Committee
>>>>                Secretary
>>>>                        - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>                        Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>           LPedia at LP.org
>>>>                        A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>                        We defend your rights
>>>>                        And oppose the use of force
>>>>                        Taxation is theft
>>>>                     References
>>>>                        1. mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>                        2. 
>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                        3. 
>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                        4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                        5. [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>                        6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                   --
>>>>                   --
>>>>                   In Liberty,
>>>>                   Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>                   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>> Committee
>>>>           Secretary
>>>>                   - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>                   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>      LPedia at LP.org
>>>>                   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>                   We defend your rights
>>>>                   And oppose the use of force
>>>>                   Taxation is theft
>>>>                References
>>>>                   1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>                   2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>                   3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>                   4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                   5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                   6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>                   7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>                   8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                   9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>                  10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                  11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>                  12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                  13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>                --
>>>>              JBH
>>>>              ------------
>>>>              Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>              LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>              [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>              [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>              --
>>>>              --
>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>      Secretary
>>>>              - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>              --
>>>>              --
>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>      Secretary
>>>>              - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>           References
>>>>              1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>              2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>              3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>              4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>              5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>              6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>              7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>              8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>              9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>             10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>             13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>             14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>             15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>             16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>             19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>             20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>             22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>             23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>             24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>             25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>             26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>             27. 
>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>             28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>             29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>         --
>>>>         --
>>>>         In Liberty,
>>>>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee 
>>>> Secretary
>>>>         - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>         We defend your rights
>>>>         And oppose the use of force
>>>>         Taxation is theft
>>>>      References
>>>>         1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>         2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>         3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>         4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>         5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>         6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>         7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>         8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>         9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>        15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>        16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>        25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>        26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>        27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>        28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>        29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>        30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>        39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>        40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>        45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>        47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>        48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>        49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>        50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>        51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>        52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>        53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>        54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>        55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>> 
>>>>    --
>>>>    --
>>>>    In Liberty,
>>>>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>>>>    - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>    We defend your rights
>>>>    And oppose the use of force
>>>>    Taxation is theft
>>>> 
>>>> References
>>>> 
>>>>    1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>    2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>    3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>    4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>    5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>    6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>    7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>    8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>    9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>   27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>   28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>   51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>   52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>   53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>   76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>   77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>   78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>   89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>   90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>   95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>   97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>   98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>   99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>  100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>  101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>  102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>  103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>  104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>  105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>  106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org




More information about the Lnc-business mailing list