[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC

erin.adams at lp.org erin.adams at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 20:02:02 EDT 2018


Elizabeth,
The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on 
this, Thats fine.



On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> Erin, I never told you to more on.  Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
> What are you talking about?  I suggested this:
> 
> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
> sense."
> 
> Please go back and reread what I wrote.  I don't appreciate you making
> up stuff that I never wrote.  Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> 
> 
> On 2018-07-11 19:43, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to hold
>> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being that
>> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
>> happy we have found agreement
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>> No one is "diminishing" your stance.  I also stated my opinion.  Nor,
>>> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
>>> tossed around on this list.
>>> 
>>> Yes, that's my opinion.  Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has 
>>> made
>>> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted.  (Nor, am I the only to
>>> think this.)
>>> 
>>> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>> Elizabeth,
>>>> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person "feeling"
>>>> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my stance
>>>> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
>>>> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
>>>> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>> Erin, what others?  I haven't seen anyone on this list try to 
>>>>> silence
>>>>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback 
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting.  Others have
>>>>> done the same.  If anything there's been pressure put on those who
>>>>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>>>>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately 
>>>>> being
>>>>> gone after to change their vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, but 
>>>>> I
>>>>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the At-Large
>>>>> vote.  For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
>>>>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
>>>>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>>>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>>>>> sense.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>>>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
>>>>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than 
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
>>>>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering 
>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments.  Your 
>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then 
>>>>>>> complained
>>>>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you. 
>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the 
>>>>>>> minority
>>>>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the 
>>>>>>> losing
>>>>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
>>>>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom. 
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
>>>>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in 
>>>>>>> cages,
>>>>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I 
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do 
>>>>>>> also,
>>>>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true 
>>>>>>>> that "
>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>  at this point except live with it the best we can for two 
>>>>>>>> years." and
>>>>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in 
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up 
>>>>>>>> folks,
>>>>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be 
>>>>>>>> dismissed
>>>>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went 
>>>>>>>>> awry.
>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two 
>>>>>>>>> years.  We
>>>>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the 
>>>>>>>>> delegates and
>>>>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot 
>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Oh my goodness.  I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>>>>>    I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am 
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>>>>>    yell it from the rooftops?  What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via 
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>    <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Agreed, to a point.  At some time, preaching to the choir 
>>>>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>>>>>      counter productive.  As noted earlier, we are all aware 
>>>>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>>>>>      sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will 
>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>      everyone happy immediately.  We all want to fix it, and 
>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>      yesterday.  I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, 
>>>>>>>>>> and yours.
>>>>>>>>>>      Bring it up once a week.  Absolutely.  Don't bring it up 
>>>>>>>>>> 5 times a
>>>>>>>>>>      day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments 
>>>>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>>>>>      time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party 
>>>>>>>>>> in other
>>>>>>>>>>      ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up 
>>>>>>>>>> continually
>>>>>>>>>>      on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.  
>>>>>>>>>> Let's move
>>>>>>>>>>      on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>>>>>      Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let 
>>>>>>>>>> this crap
>>>>>>>>>>      happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>      John Phillips
>>>>>>>>>>      Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>      Cell 217-412-5973
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing 
>>>>>>>>>> to be quiet
>>>>>>>>>>      about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a 
>>>>>>>>>> week until
>>>>>>>>>>      solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening 
>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>>>      Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>      Craig Bowden
>>>>>>>>>>      Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>>>>>      On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>>>>>         On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>      <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>           Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>           Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>>>>>           Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>           ---
>>>>>>>>>>           Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>           Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>           317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>         On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>         PS:  Before this vote ends, I am going to put 
>>>>>>>>>> something together
>>>>>>>>>>      to try
>>>>>>>>>>            to convince you that this is actually one of the 
>>>>>>>>>> worst ways to
>>>>>>>>>>         solve.
>>>>>>>>>>            My first issue - that of steering the delegates 
>>>>>>>>>> down that road
>>>>>>>>>>      with
>>>>>>>>>>            at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any 
>>>>>>>>>> way that we
>>>>>>>>>>      would
>>>>>>>>>>            ever do.  If it were up to me, I would punt it all 
>>>>>>>>>> back to the
>>>>>>>>>>            delegates.
>>>>>>>>>>            The second issue - of how to handle this situation 
>>>>>>>>>> with the JC
>>>>>>>>>>      -
>>>>>>>>>>         well
>>>>>>>>>>            we are trying to solve it now and I think we are 
>>>>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>>>>>      wrong
>>>>>>>>>>         both
>>>>>>>>>>            ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>>>>>            And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR 
>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>>      conflict.
>>>>>>>>>>            Rules are tools.  Just because a rule allows 
>>>>>>>>>> something doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>      mean
>>>>>>>>>>         it
>>>>>>>>>>            is right, and this is probably why the first issue 
>>>>>>>>>> is sticking
>>>>>>>>>>      in my
>>>>>>>>>>            craw so badly.  It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to 
>>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>>>      rules of
>>>>>>>>>>         an
>>>>>>>>>>            election mid-way.  There is a huge difference 
>>>>>>>>>> between majority
>>>>>>>>>>      and
>>>>>>>>>>            plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it 
>>>>>>>>>> effects the
>>>>>>>>>>      way
>>>>>>>>>>         they
>>>>>>>>>>            campaign.  We treated them and their efforts as 
>>>>>>>>>> pawns, and it
>>>>>>>>>>      isn't
>>>>>>>>>>            right.
>>>>>>>>>>            I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about 
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>      already.
>>>>>>>>>>            Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is 
>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>>      them.
>>>>>>>>>>         Just
>>>>>>>>>>            like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last 
>>>>>>>>>> term.
>>>>>>>>>>            The only way we are going to learn as an 
>>>>>>>>>> organization is if
>>>>>>>>>>      this is
>>>>>>>>>>         a
>>>>>>>>>>            bit painful.  And in so doing we will model 
>>>>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>>>>>      integrity
>>>>>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>>>>>            our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>            <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>            ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do 
>>>>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>>>>>            state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that 
>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>         delegates
>>>>>>>>>>            didn't even vote in the two races because we put 
>>>>>>>>>> them off so
>>>>>>>>>>      long.
>>>>>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>>>>>            the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes 
>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>      At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>>>>>            JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by 
>>>>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>>>>>      stay and
>>>>>>>>>>            vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The 
>>>>>>>>>> combination of
>>>>>>>>>>      voting
>>>>>>>>>>            methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left 
>>>>>>>>>> us in a
>>>>>>>>>>      bad
>>>>>>>>>>            place.===
>>>>>>>>>>            You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now 
>>>>>>>>>> are surprised
>>>>>>>>>>      we
>>>>>>>>>>         got
>>>>>>>>>>            ran over?
>>>>>>>>>>            But it is more than that.  The delegates were led 
>>>>>>>>>> to make a
>>>>>>>>>>      decision
>>>>>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>>>>>            a certain direction.  There WERE other options.  
>>>>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>>>>>      not one
>>>>>>>>>>            agrees with the voting methodology, it is the 
>>>>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>>>>>      its
>>>>>>>>>>            intent was to use approval voting to show approval 
>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>      turned it
>>>>>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>>>>>            its head.  Why weren't the delegates given other 
>>>>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>>>>>            ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and 
>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>      As far
>>>>>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>>>>>            actions that can be taken, this resolution is the 
>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>            Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all 
>>>>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>>>>>      members or
>>>>>>>>>>         us
>>>>>>>>>>            filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in 
>>>>>>>>>> motion - are
>>>>>>>>>>      even
>>>>>>>>>>         more
>>>>>>>>>>            violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>>>>>            Are they all?  I don't think so. And I do think my 
>>>>>>>>>> very real
>>>>>>>>>>         complaint
>>>>>>>>>>            of how the delegates were steered in a certain 
>>>>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>>>>>      being
>>>>>>>>>>            ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>>>>>            ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of 
>>>>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>            delegates expressed their wish to take the top 
>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>      candidates
>>>>>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>>>>>            the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's 
>>>>>>>>>> also no
>>>>>>>>>>      doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>         my
>>>>>>>>>>            mind that had they been asked they would have done 
>>>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>>>>      for the
>>>>>>>>>>         JC.
>>>>>>>>>>            A room of several hundred Libertarians were not 
>>>>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>>>>>      doing
>>>>>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>>>>>            - they went with what Nick suggested because that's 
>>>>>>>>>> what they
>>>>>>>>>>      wanted
>>>>>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>>>>>            do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>>>>>            And that is where the dispute is.  Most of the 
>>>>>>>>>> people there
>>>>>>>>>>      trusted
>>>>>>>>>>         us
>>>>>>>>>>            (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of 
>>>>>>>>>> the LNC
>>>>>>>>>>      and this
>>>>>>>>>>            isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what 
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>      wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>         They
>>>>>>>>>>            were presented with two choices in which they were 
>>>>>>>>>> led down a
>>>>>>>>>>            particular path.  You are an attorney Joe, you know 
>>>>>>>>>> exactly
>>>>>>>>>>      what I
>>>>>>>>>>         am
>>>>>>>>>>            getting at here.
>>>>>>>>>>            Do you really think that if they were offered a 
>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>>      rising vote
>>>>>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>>>>>            the spot to choose between options they would not 
>>>>>>>>>> have taken
>>>>>>>>>>      that?
>>>>>>>>>>         It
>>>>>>>>>>            never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any 
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>      options.  It
>>>>>>>>>>            didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed 
>>>>>>>>>> in this
>>>>>>>>>>      stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>         It
>>>>>>>>>>            stinks.  If a government acted this way we would be 
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>      lathered up.
>>>>>>>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>            <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>              I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do 
>>>>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>>>>>              state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that 
>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>              delegates didn't even vote in the two races 
>>>>>>>>>> because we put
>>>>>>>>>>      them
>>>>>>>>>>         off
>>>>>>>>>>              so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states 
>>>>>>>>>> didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>      votes in
>>>>>>>>>>              the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - 
>>>>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>>>>>      won by
>>>>>>>>>>              those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make 
>>>>>>>>>> it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>              combination of voting methodology, tabulation 
>>>>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>>>>>         scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>              left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>>>>>              All that said, I don't want to just be angry and 
>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>      As far
>>>>>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>>>>>              actions that can be taken, this resolution is the 
>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>              Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of 
>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>>      members
>>>>>>>>>>         or
>>>>>>>>>>              us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs 
>>>>>>>>>> in motion -
>>>>>>>>>>      are
>>>>>>>>>>         even
>>>>>>>>>>              more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>>>>>              I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue 
>>>>>>>>>> that every JC
>>>>>>>>>>              candidate was disapproved and that it should sit 
>>>>>>>>>> empty until
>>>>>>>>>>      2022.
>>>>>>>>>>              The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of 
>>>>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>              delegates expressed their wish to take the top 
>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>      candidates
>>>>>>>>>>              and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. 
>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>      no
>>>>>>>>>>              doubt in my mind that had they been asked they 
>>>>>>>>>> would have
>>>>>>>>>>      done the
>>>>>>>>>>              same for the JC. A room of several hundred 
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>>>>>      not
>>>>>>>>>>              coerced into doing that - they went with what 
>>>>>>>>>> Nick suggested
>>>>>>>>>>         because
>>>>>>>>>>              that's what they wanted to do. He just told them 
>>>>>>>>>> how. They
>>>>>>>>>>      didn't
>>>>>>>>>>              want the LNC fighting over who would fill the 
>>>>>>>>>> seats if they
>>>>>>>>>>      were
>>>>>>>>>>              left vacant.
>>>>>>>>>>              I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want 
>>>>>>>>>> to write
>>>>>>>>>>      this to
>>>>>>>>>>              emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or 
>>>>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>>>>>      anything
>>>>>>>>>>              blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how 
>>>>>>>>>> we do
>>>>>>>>>>      elections
>>>>>>>>>>         will
>>>>>>>>>>              be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>>>>>              JBH
>>>>>>>>>>              On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via 
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>      wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>              Suspension of the rules has to be specific and 
>>>>>>>>>> there is no
>>>>>>>>>>      way
>>>>>>>>>>              around
>>>>>>>>>>                 the fact that we used the number 5 over and 
>>>>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>>>>                 This is taking things to an even deeper level 
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>      improper.  I
>>>>>>>>>>              object to
>>>>>>>>>>                 the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the 
>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>>      made an
>>>>>>>>>>                 independent choice and now to just infer this 
>>>>>>>>>> upon that
>>>>>>>>>>      is two
>>>>>>>>>>              bridges
>>>>>>>>>>                 too far.
>>>>>>>>>>                 This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of 
>>>>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>>>>>      under
>>>>>>>>>>              the rug.
>>>>>>>>>>                 It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole 
>>>>>>>>>> situation
>>>>>>>>>>      is
>>>>>>>>>>         being
>>>>>>>>>>              taken.
>>>>>>>>>>                 There are people looking at us and seeing 
>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>>      different
>>>>>>>>>>         than
>>>>>>>>>>              the
>>>>>>>>>>                 government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>>>>>                 There was a controversial election and at 
>>>>>>>>>> least one state
>>>>>>>>>>      chair
>>>>>>>>>>              and
>>>>>>>>>>                 candidate has been asking for the state by 
>>>>>>>>>> state rallies
>>>>>>>>>>      with
>>>>>>>>>>         no
>>>>>>>>>>              time
>>>>>>>>>>                 frame given him.
>>>>>>>>>>                 The whole thing was an affront to people 
>>>>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>>>>>      entirely
>>>>>>>>>>                 different thing when they ran.  I will not be 
>>>>>>>>>> sanguine
>>>>>>>>>>      about
>>>>>>>>>>         it.
>>>>>>>>>>                 On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>                   <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                   This point did come up immediately after 
>>>>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>>>>>      while
>>>>>>>>>>           Nick
>>>>>>>>>>                was
>>>>>>>>>>                   still at the mic. I don't recall who brought 
>>>>>>>>>> it up, but
>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>                statement
>>>>>>>>>>                   was made that it would follow the same 
>>>>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>>>>>      At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>           at
>>>>>>>>>>                that
>>>>>>>>>>                   point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>>>>>                   No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>>>>>                   Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>                   Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>                   On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann 
>>>>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>           Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>                   <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                        Joshua they were not given a choice on 
>>>>>>>>>> this. The
>>>>>>>>>>      JC
>>>>>>>>>>           never
>>>>>>>>>>                came
>>>>>>>>>>                     up.
>>>>>>>>>>                        On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>                <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                      I vote yes. Given that the delegates were 
>>>>>>>>>> given the
>>>>>>>>>>      choice
>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>                      convention
>>>>>>>>>>                      just a few short days ago, I believe we 
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>      respect
>>>>>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>>>>>                      decision.
>>>>>>>>>>                      Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>                      Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>>>>>                      On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>      Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                      > We have an electronic mail ballot. 
>>>>>>>>>> Votes are due
>>>>>>>>>>      to the
>>>>>>>>>>                      LNC-Business
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm 
>>>>>>>>>> Pacific
>>>>>>>>>>      time.
>>>>>>>>>>                 Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, 
>>>>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>>>>>      Horn
>>>>>>>>>>                 Motion:
>>>>>>>>>>                      Move
>>>>>>>>>>                      > that
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    the Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>                 election of
>>>>>>>>>>                      the
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    following to the Judicial Committee 
>>>>>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>>      four-year
>>>>>>>>>>            term:
>>>>>>>>>>                 D.
>>>>>>>>>>                      Frank
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl 
>>>>>>>>>> Perry, Ruth
>>>>>>>>>>      Bennett,
>>>>>>>>>>            Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>                      Neale,
>>>>>>>>>>                      > Jim
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can 
>>>>>>>>>> keep track
>>>>>>>>>>      of
>>>>>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>>>>>                      Secretary's
>>>>>>>>>>                      >    manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    --
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    --
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Region 1 Representative, 
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>      National
>>>>>>>>>>                Committee
>>>>>>>>>>                          (Alaska,
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, 
>>>>>>>>>> Kansas, Montana,
>>>>>>>>>>           Utah,
>>>>>>>>>>                Wyoming,
>>>>>>>>>>                          > Washington)
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Communications Director, 
>>>>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>      Party of
>>>>>>>>>>                Colorado
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Chair, LP Historical 
>>>>>>>>>> Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    A haiku to the Statement of 
>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>                          >
>>>>>>>>>>                          > References
>>>>>>>>>>                          >
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    1. 
>>>>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>>>>>      m/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    2. 
>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                          >    3. 
>>>>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>>>>>      ado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>                        --
>>>>>>>>>>                        --
>>>>>>>>>>                        In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>                        Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>                        Libertarian Party and Libertarian 
>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>      Committee
>>>>>>>>>>                Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>                        - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>                        Chair, LP Historical Preservation 
>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>           LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                        A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>                        We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>                        And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>                        Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>                     References
>>>>>>>>>>                        1. 
>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>                        2. 
>>>>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                        3. 
>>>>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                        4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                        5. 
>>>>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>                        6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   --
>>>>>>>>>>                   --
>>>>>>>>>>                   In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>                   Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>                   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>           Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>                   - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>                   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee 
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>      LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>                   We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>                   And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>                   Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>                References
>>>>>>>>>>                   1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                   5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                   6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>                   7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>                   8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                   9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>                  10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                  11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>                  12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                  13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>                --
>>>>>>>>>>              JBH
>>>>>>>>>>              ------------
>>>>>>>>>>              Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>              LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>>>>>              [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>>>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>      Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>              - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>      Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>              - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>           References
>>>>>>>>>>              1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>              6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>              7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>              8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>              9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>             13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>             19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>             22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>             23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>             24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>             25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>             26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>             27. 
>>>>>>>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>             28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>             29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>>>>>         In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>         - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>         We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>         And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>         Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>      References
>>>>>>>>>>         1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>         7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>         8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>         9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>        26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>        47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>        48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>        49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>        50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>        51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>        52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>        53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>        54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>        55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>>>>>    In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>    - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>    We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>    And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>    Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>    8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>    9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>   27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>   51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>   76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>   95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>   97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>   98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>   99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>  100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>  101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>  102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>  103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>  104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>  105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>  106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org





More information about the Lnc-business mailing list