[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
erin.adams at lp.org
erin.adams at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 20:02:02 EDT 2018
Elizabeth,
The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
this, Thats fine.
On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> Erin, I never told you to more on. Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
> What are you talking about? I suggested this:
>
> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
> sense."
>
> Please go back and reread what I wrote. I don't appreciate you making
> up stuff that I never wrote. Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
>
>
> On 2018-07-11 19:43, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to hold
>> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being that
>> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
>> happy we have found agreement
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>> No one is "diminishing" your stance. I also stated my opinion. Nor,
>>> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
>>> tossed around on this list.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's my opinion. Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has
>>> made
>>> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted. (Nor, am I the only to
>>> think this.)
>>>
>>> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>> Elizabeth,
>>>> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person "feeling"
>>>> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my stance
>>>> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
>>>> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
>>>> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>> Erin, what others? I haven't seen anyone on this list try to
>>>>> silence
>>>>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting. Others have
>>>>> done the same. If anything there's been pressure put on those who
>>>>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>>>>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately
>>>>> being
>>>>> gone after to change their vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, but
>>>>> I
>>>>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the At-Large
>>>>> vote. For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
>>>>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
>>>>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>>>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>>>>> sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>>>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
>>>>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
>>>>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering
>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments. Your
>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then
>>>>>>> complained
>>>>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you.
>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the
>>>>>>> minority
>>>>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the
>>>>>>> losing
>>>>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
>>>>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom.
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
>>>>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in
>>>>>>> cages,
>>>>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do
>>>>>>> also,
>>>>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true
>>>>>>>> that "
>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>> years." and
>>>>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up
>>>>>>>> folks,
>>>>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be
>>>>>>>> dismissed
>>>>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went
>>>>>>>>> awry.
>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>>> years. We
>>>>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the
>>>>>>>>> delegates and
>>>>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot
>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Oh my goodness. I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>>>>> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>>>>> yell it from the rooftops? What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Agreed, to a point. At some time, preaching to the choir
>>>>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>>>>> counter productive. As noted earlier, we are all aware
>>>>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>>>>> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will
>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>> everyone happy immediately. We all want to fix it, and
>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday. I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points,
>>>>>>>>>> and yours.
>>>>>>>>>> Bring it up once a week. Absolutely. Don't bring it up
>>>>>>>>>> 5 times a
>>>>>>>>>> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments
>>>>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>>>>> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party
>>>>>>>>>> in other
>>>>>>>>>> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
>>>>>>>>>> continually
>>>>>>>>>> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.
>>>>>>>>>> Let's move
>>>>>>>>>> on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>>>>> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let
>>>>>>>>>> this crap
>>>>>>>>>> happen again.
>>>>>>>>>> John Phillips
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>>>>> Cell 217-412-5973
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing
>>>>>>>>>> to be quiet
>>>>>>>>>> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a
>>>>>>>>>> week until
>>>>>>>>>> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening
>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>> Craig Bowden
>>>>>>>>>> Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>> Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> PS: Before this vote ends, I am going to put
>>>>>>>>>> something together
>>>>>>>>>> to try
>>>>>>>>>> to convince you that this is actually one of the
>>>>>>>>>> worst ways to
>>>>>>>>>> solve.
>>>>>>>>>> My first issue - that of steering the delegates
>>>>>>>>>> down that road
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any
>>>>>>>>>> way that we
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> ever do. If it were up to me, I would punt it all
>>>>>>>>>> back to the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates.
>>>>>>>>>> The second issue - of how to handle this situation
>>>>>>>>>> with the JC
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are
>>>>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>> ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>>>>> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR
>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>> conflict.
>>>>>>>>>> Rules are tools. Just because a rule allows
>>>>>>>>>> something doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is right, and this is probably why the first issue
>>>>>>>>>> is sticking
>>>>>>>>>> in my
>>>>>>>>>> craw so badly. It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to
>>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>>> rules of
>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>> election mid-way. There is a huge difference
>>>>>>>>>> between majority
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it
>>>>>>>>>> effects the
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> campaign. We treated them and their efforts as
>>>>>>>>>> pawns, and it
>>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>>>>> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is
>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last
>>>>>>>>>> term.
>>>>>>>>>> The only way we are going to learn as an
>>>>>>>>>> organization is if
>>>>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> bit painful. And in so doing we will model
>>>>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>>>>> integrity
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do
>>>>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>> didn't even vote in the two races because we put
>>>>>>>>>> them off so
>>>>>>>>>> long.
>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes
>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by
>>>>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>>>>> stay and
>>>>>>>>>> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>> combination of
>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left
>>>>>>>>>> us in a
>>>>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>> place.===
>>>>>>>>>> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now
>>>>>>>>>> are surprised
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>> ran over?
>>>>>>>>>> But it is more than that. The delegates were led
>>>>>>>>>> to make a
>>>>>>>>>> decision
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> a certain direction. There WERE other options.
>>>>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>>>>> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the
>>>>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>> intent was to use approval voting to show approval
>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>> turned it
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> its head. Why weren't the delegates given other
>>>>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>>>>> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the
>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
>>>>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>>>>> members or
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in
>>>>>>>>>> motion - are
>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>>>>> Are they all? I don't think so. And I do think my
>>>>>>>>>> very real
>>>>>>>>>> complaint
>>>>>>>>>> of how the delegates were steered in a certain
>>>>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>>>>> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>>>>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's
>>>>>>>>>> also no
>>>>>>>>>> doubt in
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> mind that had they been asked they would have done
>>>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>> JC.
>>>>>>>>>> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not
>>>>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> - they went with what Nick suggested because that's
>>>>>>>>>> what they
>>>>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>>>>> And that is where the dispute is. Most of the
>>>>>>>>>> people there
>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of
>>>>>>>>>> the LNC
>>>>>>>>>> and this
>>>>>>>>>> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>> were presented with two choices in which they were
>>>>>>>>>> led down a
>>>>>>>>>> particular path. You are an attorney Joe, you know
>>>>>>>>>> exactly
>>>>>>>>>> what I
>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>> getting at here.
>>>>>>>>>> Do you really think that if they were offered a
>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>> rising vote
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> the spot to choose between options they would not
>>>>>>>>>> have taken
>>>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> options. It
>>>>>>>>>> didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed
>>>>>>>>>> in this
>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>> stinks. If a government acted this way we would be
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>> lathered up.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>> <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do
>>>>>>>>>> get the
>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>> delegates didn't even vote in the two races
>>>>>>>>>> because we put
>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states
>>>>>>>>>> didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>> votes in
>>>>>>>>>> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules -
>>>>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>>>>> won by
>>>>>>>>>> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make
>>>>>>>>>> it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>> combination of voting methodology, tabulation
>>>>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>>>>> scheduling
>>>>>>>>>> left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>>>>> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the
>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of
>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs
>>>>>>>>>> in motion -
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>>>>> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue
>>>>>>>>>> that every JC
>>>>>>>>>> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit
>>>>>>>>>> empty until
>>>>>>>>>> 2022.
>>>>>>>>>> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>>>>>>>>>> legality:
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they
>>>>>>>>>> would have
>>>>>>>>>> done the
>>>>>>>>>> same for the JC. A room of several hundred
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> coerced into doing that - they went with what
>>>>>>>>>> Nick suggested
>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them
>>>>>>>>>> how. They
>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the
>>>>>>>>>> seats if they
>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>> left vacant.
>>>>>>>>>> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want
>>>>>>>>>> to write
>>>>>>>>>> this to
>>>>>>>>>> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or
>>>>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how
>>>>>>>>>> we do
>>>>>>>>>> elections
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and
>>>>>>>>>> there is no
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>> the fact that we used the number 5 over and
>>>>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>>>> This is taking things to an even deeper level
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> improper. I
>>>>>>>>>> object to
>>>>>>>>>> the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>> made an
>>>>>>>>>> independent choice and now to just infer this
>>>>>>>>>> upon that
>>>>>>>>>> is two
>>>>>>>>>> bridges
>>>>>>>>>> too far.
>>>>>>>>>> This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of
>>>>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>> the rug.
>>>>>>>>>> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
>>>>>>>>>> situation
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>> taken.
>>>>>>>>>> There are people looking at us and seeing
>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>>>>> There was a controversial election and at
>>>>>>>>>> least one state
>>>>>>>>>> chair
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> candidate has been asking for the state by
>>>>>>>>>> state rallies
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>> frame given him.
>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing was an affront to people
>>>>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>>>>> entirely
>>>>>>>>>> different thing when they ran. I will not be
>>>>>>>>>> sanguine
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This point did come up immediately after
>>>>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> still at the mic. I don't recall who brought
>>>>>>>>>> it up, but
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>>>>> was made that it would follow the same
>>>>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>>>>> No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>>>>> Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>> Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann
>>>>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Joshua they were not given a choice on
>>>>>>>>>> this. The
>>>>>>>>>> JC
>>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>>> came
>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I vote yes. Given that the delegates were
>>>>>>>>>> given the
>>>>>>>>>> choice
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> convention
>>>>>>>>>> just a few short days ago, I believe we
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> respect
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> decision.
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > We have an electronic mail ballot.
>>>>>>>>>> Votes are due
>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>> LNC-Business
>>>>>>>>>> > list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm
>>>>>>>>>> Pacific
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>> Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>>>>> > Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan,
>>>>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>>>>> Horn
>>>>>>>>>> Motion:
>>>>>>>>>> Move
>>>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>>>> > the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> election of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> > following to the Judicial Committee
>>>>>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>> four-year
>>>>>>>>>> term:
>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>>> > Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl
>>>>>>>>>> Perry, Ruth
>>>>>>>>>> Bennett,
>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>>>>> Neale,
>>>>>>>>>> > Jim
>>>>>>>>>> > Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can
>>>>>>>>>> keep track
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary's
>>>>>>>>>> > manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative,
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>> (Alaska,
>>>>>>>>>> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii,
>>>>>>>>>> Kansas, Montana,
>>>>>>>>>> Utah,
>>>>>>>>>> Wyoming,
>>>>>>>>>> > Washington)
>>>>>>>>>> > - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> > Communications Director,
>>>>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>> Party of
>>>>>>>>>> Colorado
>>>>>>>>>> > Chair, LP Historical
>>>>>>>>>> Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>> > A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> > We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> > And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> > Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > References
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > 1.
>>>>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>>>>> m/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> > 2.
>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> > 3.
>>>>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>>>>> ado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>>>>> [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 27.
>>>>>>>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>> - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>> 97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>> 99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> 102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>> 103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>> 106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list