[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC

Elizabeth Van Horn elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 20:23:23 EDT 2018


I wonder which of us has sent the most emails to this list?  

Oh, wait, I think everyone knows the answer....and it's not me. 

---
Elizabeth Van Horn

On 2018-07-11 20:13, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

> Elizabeth, both you and I are email drowners.  I was glad to have a partner in crime when you came on board.  I would love to see the stats since then... wait... I can go look them up myself now :) 
> 
> I think the fact that you email a lot is a feature not a bug. 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business <lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Nonsense.  In your mind, but not mine. My intent matters.
> 
> Believe me, I have no problem stating my mind. IF I want to say, "move on", I'll bloody well write that.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY) 
> 
> On 2018-07-11 20:02, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> Elizabeth,
> The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
> this, Thats fine.
> 
> On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> Erin, I never told you to more on.  Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
> What are you talking about?  I suggested this:
> 
> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
> sense."
> 
> Please go back and reread what I wrote.  I don't appreciate you making
> up stuff that I never wrote.  Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> 
> On 2018-07-11 19:43, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to hold
> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being that
> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
> happy we have found agreement
> 
> On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> No one is "diminishing" your stance.  I also stated my opinion.  Nor,
> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
> tossed around on this list.
> 
> Yes, that's my opinion.  Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has made
> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted.  (Nor, am I the only to
> think this.)
> 
> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> 
> On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> Elizabeth,
> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person "feeling"
> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my stance
> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
> 
> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> Erin, what others?  I haven't seen anyone on this list try to silence
> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback I'm
> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting.  Others have
> done the same.  If anything there's been pressure put on those who
> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately being
> gone after to change their vote.
> 
> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, but I
> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the At-Large
> vote.  For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
> 
> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
> sense.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> 
> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to be
> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention of
> doing that.
> 
> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
> Ms. Adams,
> 
> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than I've
> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
> actually being silenced.
> 
> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering questions
> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments.  Your response
> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then complained
> about the tone of the debate.
> 
> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you. On
> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the minority
> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the losing
> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom. The
> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in cages,
> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I will
> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do also,
> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
> 
> JBH
> 
> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true that "
> There is nothing we can do about it
> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years." and
> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in an
> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up folks,
> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you will
> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be dismissed
> and silenced.
> 
> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
> Caryn Ann,
> 
> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went awry.
> There is nothing we can do about it
> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years.  We
> will have a fix in place before the
> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the delegates and
> made effective immediately.
> 
> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot thread
> which is supposed to just be for recording
> votes on the motion.
> 
> ---
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 Cell
> 
> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> Oh my goodness.  I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am supposed to NOT
> yell it from the rooftops?  What Party am I in again?
> 
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> 
> Agreed, to a point.  At some time, preaching to the choir becomes
> counter productive.  As noted earlier, we are all aware that it
> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will make
> everyone happy immediately.  We all want to fix it, and fix it
> yesterday.  I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, and yours.
> Bring it up once a week.  Absolutely.  Don't bring it up 5 times a
> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments takes away
> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party in other
> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up continually
> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.  Let's move
> on and FIX IT.
> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let this crap
> happen again.
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell 217-412-5973
> 
> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
> 
> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing to be quiet
> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a week until
> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening again.
> Respectfully,
> Craig Bowden
> Region 1 Alternate
> On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> 
> I respectfully decline.
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
> <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
> wrote:
> Caryn Ann,
> Just shut up about this already!
> Respectfully,
> ---
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 Cell
> On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> PS:  Before this vote ends, I am going to put something together
> to try
> to convince you that this is actually one of the worst ways to
> solve.
> My first issue - that of steering the delegates down that road
> with
> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any way that we
> would
> ever do.  If it were up to me, I would punt it all back to the
> delegates.
> The second issue - of how to handle this situation with the JC
> -
> well
> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are solving it
> wrong
> both
> ethically and procedurally.
> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR come into
> conflict.
> Rules are tools.  Just because a rule allows something doesn't
> mean
> it
> is right, and this is probably why the first issue is sticking
> in my
> craw so badly.  It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to change the
> rules of
> an
> election mid-way.  There is a huge difference between majority
> and
> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it effects the
> way
> they
> campaign.  We treated them and their efforts as pawns, and it
> isn't
> right.
> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about this
> already.
> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is one of
> them.
> Just
> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last term.
> The only way we are going to learn as an organization is if
> this is
> a
> bit painful.  And in so doing we will model over-the-top
> integrity
> to
> our members rather than political expediency.
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get the
> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds of
> delegates
> didn't even vote in the two races because we put them off so
> long.
> In
> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes in the
> At-Large
> and
> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by those who
> stay and
> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The combination of
> voting
> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left us in a
> bad
> place.===
> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now are surprised
> we
> got
> ran over?
> But it is more than that.  The delegates were led to make a
> decision
> in
> a certain direction.  There WERE other options.  Whether or
> not one
> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the methodology and
> its
> intent was to use approval voting to show approval and we
> turned it
> on
> its head.  Why weren't the delegates given other options?
> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and complain.
> As far
> as
> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
> reasonable.
> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
> members or
> us
> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion - are
> even
> more
> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
> Are they all?  I don't think so. And I do think my very real
> complaint
> of how the delegates were steered in a certain direction is
> being
> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of legality:
> the
> delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
> candidates
> and
> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's also no
> doubt in
> my
> mind that had they been asked they would have done the same
> for the
> JC.
> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not coerced into
> doing
> that
> - they went with what Nick suggested because that's what they
> wanted
> to
> do. He just told them how.===
> And that is where the dispute is.  Most of the people there
> trusted
> us
> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of the LNC
> and this
> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what they
> wanted.
> They
> were presented with two choices in which they were led down a
> particular path.  You are an attorney Joe, you know exactly
> what I
> am
> getting at here.
> Do you really think that if they were offered a majority
> rising vote
> on
> the spot to choose between options they would not have taken
> that?
> It
> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any other
> options.  It
> didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed in this
> stuff.
> It
> stinks.  If a government acted this way we would be all
> lathered up.
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
> <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get the
> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds of
> delegates didn't even vote in the two races because we put
> them
> off
> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast
> votes in
> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - elections are
> won by
> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The
> combination of voting methodology, tabulation method, and
> scheduling
> left us in a bad place.
> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and complain.
> As far
> as
> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
> reasonable.
> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
> members
> or
> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion -
> are
> even
> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue that every JC
> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit empty until
> 2022.
> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of legality:
> the
> delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
> candidates
> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's also
> no
> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they would have
> done the
> same for the JC. A room of several hundred Libertarians were
> not
> coerced into doing that - they went with what Nick suggested
> because
> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them how. They
> didn't
> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the seats if they
> were
> left vacant.
> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want to write
> this to
> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or sweeping
> anything
> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how we do
> elections
> will
> be a big priority for many of us.
> JBH
> On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> wrote:
> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and there is no
> way
> around
> the fact that we used the number 5 over and over.
> This is taking things to an even deeper level of
> improper.  I
> object to
> the whole at-Large process- I don't think the delegates
> made an
> independent choice and now to just infer this upon that
> is two
> bridges
> too far.
> This is a big screwup and I won't be part of sweeping it
> under
> the rug.
> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole situation
> is
> being
> taken.
> There are people looking at us and seeing nothing
> different
> than
> the
> government we wish to reform.
> There was a controversial election and at least one state
> chair
> and
> candidate has been asking for the state by state rallies
> with
> no
> time
> frame given him.
> The whole thing was an affront to people expecting an
> entirely
> different thing when they ran.  I will not be sanguine
> about
> it.
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
> <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
> This point did come up immediately after adjournment,
> while
> Nick
> was
> still at the mic. I don't recall who brought it up, but
> the
> statement
> was made that it would follow the same procedure as
> At-Large
> at
> that
> point, since we were no longer in session.
> No one raised the question prior to that.
> Whitney Bilyeu
> Region 7 Representative
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via
> Lnc-business
> <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Joshua they were not given a choice on this. The
> JC
> never
> came
> up.
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
> <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
> wrote:
> I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given the
> choice
> at
> convention
> just a few short days ago, I believe we should
> respect
> that
> decision.
> Thanks,
> Joshua D. Smith
> On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
> Lnc-business
> wrote:
>> We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are due
> to the
> LNC-Business
>>    list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm Pacific
> time.
> Co-Sponsors:
>>    Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced, Van
> Horn
> Motion:
> Move
>> that
>>    the Libertarian National Committee acknowledge
> the
> election of
> the
>>    following to the Judicial Committee for a
> four-year
> term:
> D.
> Frank
>>    Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth
> Bennett,
> Geoff
> Neale,
>> Jim
>>    Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep track
> of
> the
> Secretary's
>>    manual tally of votes here:
> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
>>    --
>>    --
>>    In Liberty,
>>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian
> National
> Committee
> (Alaska,
>>    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana,
> Utah,
> Wyoming,
>> Washington)
>>    - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>    Communications Director, [3]Libertarian
> Party of
> Colorado
>>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>    We defend your rights
>>    And oppose the use of force
>>    Taxation is theft
>>
>> References
>>
>>    1. [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co [2]
> m/lncvoting
>>    2. mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>    3. [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor [3]
> ado.org/ [4]
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
> Committee
> Secretary
> - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
> LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> References
> 1. mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 2. [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 3. [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 5. [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> Secretary
> - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
> LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> References
> 1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
> JBH
> ------------
> Joe Bishop-Henchman
> LNC Member (At-Large)
> [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> Secretary
> - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> Secretary
> - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> References
> 1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/ [5]
> 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 27. [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> References
> 1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
> 2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
> 45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting [1]
> 47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> 
> References
> 
> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
> 52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
> 95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
> 97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
> 99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> 102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837 [6]
> 103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org

  -- 

-- 

IN LIBERTY, 
CARYN ANN HARLOS 
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org. 
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org 

A haiku to the Statement of Principles: 
_We defend your rights_ 
_And oppose the use of force_ 
_Taxation is theft_ 

Links:
------
[1] https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
[2] https://tinyurl.co
[3] http://www.lpcolor
[4] http://ado.org/
[5] http://www.lpcolorado.org/
[6] http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
-------------- next part --------------
   I wonder which of us has sent the most emails to this list?
   Oh, wait, I think everyone knows the answer....and it's not me.

   ---
   Elizabeth Van Horn

   On 2018-07-11 20:13, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

   Elizabeth, both you and I are email drowners.  I was glad to have a
   partner in crime when you came on board.  I would love to see the stats
   since then... wait... I can go look them up myself now :)

   I think the fact that you email a lot is a feature not a bug.

   On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

     Nonsense.  In your mind, but not mine. My intent matters.
     Believe me, I have no problem stating my mind. IF I want to say,
     "move on", I'll bloody well write that.
     ---
     Elizabeth Van Horn
     LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)

   On 2018-07-11 20:02, [2]erin.adams at lp.org wrote:

     Elizabeth,
     The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
     this, Thats fine.
     On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:

     Erin, I never told you to more on.  Nor, did I "insist", that you
     do.
     What are you talking about?  I suggested this:
     "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
     take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
     discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
     sense."
     Please go back and reread what I wrote.  I don't appreciate you
     making
     up stuff that I never wrote.  Sheesh, it's all right here in
     writing.
     ---
     Elizabeth Van Horn
     On 2018-07-11 19:43, [3]erin.adams at lp.org wrote:

     I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to
     hold
     your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being
     that
     I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
     happy we have found agreement
     On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:

     No one is "diminishing" your stance.  I also stated my opinion.
     Nor,
     am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
     tossed around on this list.
     Yes, that's my opinion.  Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has
     made
     about people being "silenced' is unwarranted.  (Nor, am I the only
     to
     think this.)
     You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
     ---
     Elizabeth Van Horn
     On 2018-07-11 19:25, [4]erin.adams at lp.org wrote:

     Elizabeth,
     It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person "feeling"
     this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my stance
     nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
     OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
     belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
     On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:

     Erin, what others?  I haven't seen anyone on this list try to
     silence
     others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback I'm
     getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting.  Others have
     done the same.  If anything there's been pressure put on those who
     want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
     constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately
     being
     gone after to change their vote.
     I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, but
     I
     can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the At-Large
     vote.  For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
     have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
     accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
     If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
     take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
     discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
     sense.
     ---
     Elizabeth Van Horn
     On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:

     Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
     YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems to
     be
     Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention of
     doing that.
     On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:

     Ms. Adams,
     By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
     Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than I've
     sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
     actually being silenced.
     I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering
     questions
     and respectfully if energetically countering arguments.  Your
     response
     to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
     "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then
     complained
     about the tone of the debate.
     I would like to have a good working relationship with all of you. On
     Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the
     minority
     got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the losing
     side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we had
     passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or martyrdom.
     The
     enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out there
     passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in cages,
     bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I will
     keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do also,
     even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
     JBH
     On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:

     With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true that
     "
     There is nothing we can do about it
      at this point except live with it the best we can for two years."
     and
     honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in an
     attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up
     folks,
     if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you will
     hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be
     dismissed
     and silenced.
     On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:

     Caryn Ann,
     We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went awry.
     There is nothing we can do about it
     at this point except live with it the best we can for two years.  We
     will have a fix in place before the
     convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the delegates
     and
     made effective immediately.
     At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot thread
     which is supposed to just be for recording
     votes on the motion.
     ---
     Sam Goldstein
     Libertarian National Committee
     317-850-0726 Cell
     On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:

     Oh my goodness.  I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
        I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am supposed
     to NOT
        yell it from the rooftops?  What Party am I in again?
        On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
        <[1][5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
          Agreed, to a point.  At some time, preaching to the choir
     becomes
          counter productive.  As noted earlier, we are all aware that it
          sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will make
          everyone happy immediately.  We all want to fix it, and fix it
          yesterday.  I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, and
     yours.
          Bring it up once a week.  Absolutely.  Don't bring it up 5
     times a
          day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments takes
     away
          time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party in
     other
          ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
     continually
          on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.  Let's
     move
          on and FIX IT.
          Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let this crap
          happen again.
          John Phillips
          Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
          Cell 217-412-5973
        On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
          Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing to be
     quiet
          about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a week
     until
          solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening again.
          Respectfully,
          Craig Bowden
          Region 1 Alternate
          On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
          I respectfully decline.
             On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
          <[1][2][6]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
             wrote:
               Caryn Ann,
               Just shut up about this already!
               Respectfully,
               ---
               Sam Goldstein
               Libertarian National Committee
               317-850-0726 Cell
             On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
     wrote:
             PS:  Before this vote ends, I am going to put something
     together
          to try
                to convince you that this is actually one of the worst
     ways to
             solve.
                My first issue - that of steering the delegates down that
     road
          with
                at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any way
     that we
          would
                ever do.  If it were up to me, I would punt it all back
     to the
                delegates.
                The second issue - of how to handle this situation with
     the JC
          -
             well
                we are trying to solve it now and I think we are solving
     it
          wrong
             both
                ethically and procedurally.
                And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR come
     into
          conflict.
                Rules are tools.  Just because a rule allows something
     doesn't
          mean
             it
                is right, and this is probably why the first issue is
     sticking
          in my
                craw so badly.  It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to change
     the
          rules of
             an
                election mid-way.  There is a huge difference between
     majority
          and
                plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it
     effects the
          way
             they
                campaign.  We treated them and their efforts as pawns,
     and it
          isn't
                right.
                I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about this
          already.
                Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is one of
          them.
             Just
                like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last term.
                The only way we are going to learn as an organization is
     if
          this is
             a
                bit painful.  And in so doing we will model over-the-top
          integrity
             to
                our members rather than political expediency.
                On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
                <[1][2][3][7]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
                ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get
     the
                state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds
     of
             delegates
                didn't even vote in the two races because we put them off
     so
          long.
             In
                the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes in
     the
          At-Large
             and
                JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by those
     who
          stay and
                vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The combination of
          voting
                methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left us in
     a
          bad
                place.===
                You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now are
     surprised
          we
             got
                ran over?
                But it is more than that.  The delegates were led to make
     a
          decision
             in
                a certain direction.  There WERE other options.  Whether
     or
          not one
                agrees with the voting methodology, it is the methodology
     and
          its
                intent was to use approval voting to show approval and we
          turned it
             on
                its head.  Why weren't the delegates given other options?
                ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
     complain.
          As far
             as
                actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
          reasonable.
                Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
          members or
             us
                filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion -
     are
          even
             more
                violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
                Are they all?  I don't think so. And I do think my very
     real
             complaint
                of how the delegates were steered in a certain direction
     is
          being
                ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
                ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
     legality:
          the
                delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
          candidates
             and
                the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's also
     no
          doubt in
             my
                mind that had they been asked they would have done the
     same
          for the
             JC.
                A room of several hundred Libertarians were not coerced
     into
          doing
             that
                - they went with what Nick suggested because that's what
     they
          wanted
             to
                do. He just told them how.===
                And that is where the dispute is.  Most of the people
     there
          trusted
             us
                (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of the
     LNC
          and this
                isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what they
          wanted.
             They
                were presented with two choices in which they were led
     down a
                particular path.  You are an attorney Joe, you know
     exactly
          what I
             am
                getting at here.
                Do you really think that if they were offered a majority
          rising vote
             on
                the spot to choose between options they would not have
     taken
          that?
             It
                never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any other
          options.  It
                didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed in
     this
          stuff.
             It
                stinks.  If a government acted this way we would be all
          lathered up.
                On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
                <[2][3][4][8]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
                  I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get
     the
                  state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
     hundreds of
                  delegates didn't even vote in the two races because we
     put
          them
             off
                  so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states didn't
     cast
          votes in
                  the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - elections
     are
          won by
                  those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make it
     hard. The
                  combination of voting methodology, tabulation method,
     and
             scheduling
                  left us in a bad place.
                  All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
     complain.
          As far
             as
                  actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
          reasonable.
                  Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
     Party
          members
             or
                  us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in
     motion -
          are
             even
                  more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
                  I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue that
     every JC
                  candidate was disapproved and that it should sit empty
     until
          2022.
                  The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
     legality:
          the
                  delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
          candidates
                  and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's
     also
          no
                  doubt in my mind that had they been asked they would
     have
          done the
                  same for the JC. A room of several hundred Libertarians
     were
          not
                  coerced into doing that - they went with what Nick
     suggested
             because
                  that's what they wanted to do. He just told them how.
     They
          didn't
                  want the LNC fighting over who would fill the seats if
     they
          were
                  left vacant.
                  I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want to
     write
          this to
                  emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or sweeping
          anything
                  blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how we do
          elections
             will
                  be a big priority for many of us.
                  JBH
                  On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
          wrote:
                  Suspension of the rules has to be specific and there is
     no
          way
                  around
                     the fact that we used the number 5 over and over.
                     This is taking things to an even deeper level of
          improper.  I
                  object to
                     the whole at-Large process- I don't think the
     delegates
          made an
                     independent choice and now to just infer this upon
     that
          is two
                  bridges
                     too far.
                     This is a big screwup and I won't be part of
     sweeping it
          under
                  the rug.
                     It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
     situation
          is
             being
                  taken.
                     There are people looking at us and seeing nothing
          different
             than
                  the
                     government we wish to reform.
                     There was a controversial election and at least one
     state
          chair
                  and
                     candidate has been asking for the state by state
     rallies
          with
             no
                  time
                     frame given him.
                     The whole thing was an affront to people expecting
     an
          entirely
                     different thing when they ran.  I will not be
     sanguine
          about
             it.
                     On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
                       <[1][3][4][5][9]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
                       This point did come up immediately after
     adjournment,
          while
               Nick
                    was
                       still at the mic. I don't recall who brought it
     up, but
          the
                    statement
                       was made that it would follow the same procedure
     as
          At-Large
               at
                    that
                       point, since we were no longer in session.
                       No one raised the question prior to that.
                       Whitney Bilyeu
                       Region 7 Representative
                       On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
     via
               Lnc-business
                       <[2][4][5][6][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
                            Joshua they were not given a choice on this.
     The
          JC
               never
                    came
                         up.
                            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
                    <[1][3][5][6][7][11]joshua.smith at lp.org>
                     wrote:
                          I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given
     the
          choice
             at
                          convention
                          just a few short days ago, I believe we should
          respect
             that
                          decision.
                          Thanks,
                          Joshua D. Smith
                          On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
          Lnc-business
             wrote:
                          > We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are
     due
          to the
                          LNC-Business
                          >    list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm
     Pacific
          time.
                     Co-Sponsors:
                          >    Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced,
     Van
          Horn
                     Motion:
                          Move
                          > that
                          >    the Libertarian National Committee
     acknowledge
          the
                     election of
                          the
                          >    following to the Judicial Committee for a
          four-year
                term:
                     D.
                          Frank
                          >    Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry,
     Ruth
          Bennett,
                Geoff
                          Neale,
                          > Jim
                          >    Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep
     track
          of
             the
                          Secretary's
                          >    manual tally of votes here:
                         [1][2][4][6][7][8][12]https://tiny
     url.com/lncvoting
                              >    --
                              >    --
                              >    In Liberty,
                              >    Caryn Ann Harlos
                              >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian
          National
                    Committee
                              (Alaska,
                              >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas,
     Montana,
               Utah,
                    Wyoming,
                              > Washington)
                              >    - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
                              >    Communications Director,
     [3]Libertarian
          Party of
                    Colorado
                              >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation
     Committee
                              >    A haiku to the Statement of
     Principles:
                              >    We defend your rights
                              >    And oppose the use of force
                              >    Taxation is theft
                              >
                              > References
                              >
                              >    1. [3][5][7][8][9][13]https://tinyurl
     .co
          m/lncvoting
                              >    2. mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                              >    3. [5][6][8][9][10][14]http://www.lpc
     olor
          [15]ado.org/
                            --
                            --
                            In Liberty,
                            Caryn Ann Harlos
                            Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
          Committee
                    Secretary
                            - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
     Secretary at LP.org.
                            Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
               LPedia at LP.org
                            A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
                            We defend your rights
                            And oppose the use of force
                            Taxation is theft
                         References
                            1. mailto:[7][9][10][11][16]joshua.sm
     ith at lp.org
                            2. [8][10][11][12][17]https://tinyurl
     .com/lncvoting
                            3. [9][11][12][13][18]https://tinyurl
     .com/lncvoting
                            4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                            5. [11][12][13][14][19]http://www.lpc
     olorado.org/
                            6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                       --
                       --
                       In Liberty,
                       Caryn Ann Harlos
                       Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
     Committee
               Secretary
                       - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
     Secretary at LP.org.
                       Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
          LPedia at LP.org
                       A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
                       We defend your rights
                       And oppose the use of force
                       Taxation is theft
                    References
                       1. mailto:[13][14][15][20]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
                       2. mailto:[14][15][16][21]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                       3. mailto:[15][16][17][22]joshua.smith at lp.org
                       4. [16][17][18][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                       5. [17][18][19][24]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                       6. [18][19][20][25]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                       7. mailto:[19][20][21][26]joshua.smith at lp.org
                       8. [20][21][22][27]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                       9. [21][22][23][28]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                      10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                      11. [23][23][24][29]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                      12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                      13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                    --
                  JBH
                  ------------
                  Joe Bishop-Henchman
                  LNC Member (At-Large)
                  [26][24][25][30]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
                  [27][25][26][31]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
                  --
                  --
                  In Liberty,
                  Caryn Ann Harlos
                  Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
          Secretary
                  - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
                  Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
     LPedia at LP.org
                  A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
                  We defend your rights
                  And oppose the use of force
                  Taxation is theft
                  --
                  --
                  In Liberty,
                  Caryn Ann Harlos
                  Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
          Secretary
                  - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
                  Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
     LPedia at LP.org
                  A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
                  We defend your rights
                  And oppose the use of force
                  Taxation is theft
               References
                  1. mailto:[26][27][32]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
                  2. mailto:[27][28][33]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
                  3. mailto:[28][29][34]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
                  4. mailto:[29][30][35]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                  5. mailto:[30][31][36]joshua.smith at lp.org
                  6. [31][32][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                  7. [32][33][38]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                  8. [33][34][39]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                  9. mailto:[34][35][40]joshua.smith at lp.org
                 10. [35][36][41]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 11. [36][37][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 12. [37][38][43]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                 13. mailto:[38][39][44]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
                 14. mailto:[39][40][45]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
                 15. mailto:[40][41][46]joshua.smith at lp.org
                 16. [41][42][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 17. [42][43][48]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 18. [43][44][49]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                 19. mailto:[44][45][50]joshua.smith at lp.org
                 20. [45][46][51]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 21. [46][47][52]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
                 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                 23. [48][48][53]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
                 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                 26. mailto:[51][49][54]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
                 27. [52][50][55]http://www.facebook.co
     m/groups/189510455174837
                 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
                 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
             --
             --
             In Liberty,
             Caryn Ann Harlos
             Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
             - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
             Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
             A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
             We defend your rights
             And oppose the use of force
             Taxation is theft
          References
             1. mailto:[51][56]sam.goldstein at lp.org
             2. mailto:[52][57]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
             3. mailto:[53][58]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
             4. mailto:[54][59]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
             5. mailto:[55][60]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
             6. mailto:[56][61]joshua.smith at lp.org
             7. [57][62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
             8. [58][63]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
             9. [59][64]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            10. mailto:[60][65]joshua.smith at lp.org
            11. [61][66]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            12. [62][67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            13. [63][68]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            14. mailto:[64][69]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
            15. mailto:[65][70]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
            16. mailto:[66][71]joshua.smith at lp.org
            17. [67][72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            18. [68][73]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            19. [69][74]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            20. mailto:[70][75]joshua.smith at lp.org
            21. [71][76]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            22. [72][77]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            23. [73][78]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            24. mailto:[74][79]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
            25. [75][80]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
            26. mailto:[76][81]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
            27. mailto:[77][82]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
            28. mailto:[78][83]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
            29. mailto:[79][84]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
            30. mailto:[80][85]joshua.smith at lp.org
            31. [81][86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            32. [82][87]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            33. [83][88]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            34. mailto:[84][89]joshua.smith at lp.org
            35. [85][90]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            36. [86][91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            37. [87][92]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            38. mailto:[88][93]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
            39. mailto:[89][94]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
            40. mailto:[90][95]joshua.smith at lp.org
            41. [91][96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            42. [92][97]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            43. [93][98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            44. mailto:[94][99]joshua.smith at lp.org
            45. [95][100]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            46. [96][101]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
            47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
            48. [98][102]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
            49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
            50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
            51. mailto:[101][103]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
            52. [102][104]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
            53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
            54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
            55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
        --
        --
        In Liberty,
        Caryn Ann Harlos
        Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
        - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
        Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
        A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
        We defend your rights
        And oppose the use of force
        Taxation is theft
     References
        1. mailto:[105]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        2. mailto:[106]sam.goldstein at lp.org
        3. mailto:[107]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
        4. mailto:[108]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
        5. mailto:[109]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
        6. mailto:[110]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        7. mailto:[111]joshua.smith at lp.org
        8. [112]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
        9. [113]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       10. [114]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       11. mailto:[115]joshua.smith at lp.org
       12. [116]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       13. [117]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       14. [118]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       15. mailto:[119]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       16. mailto:[120]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       17. mailto:[121]joshua.smith at lp.org
       18. [122]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       19. [123]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       20. [124]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       21. mailto:[125]joshua.smith at lp.org
       22. [126]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       23. [127]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       24. [128]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       25. mailto:[129]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       26. [130]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
       27. mailto:[131]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
       28. mailto:[132]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       29. mailto:[133]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       30. mailto:[134]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       31. mailto:[135]joshua.smith at lp.org
       32. [136]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       33. [137]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       34. [138]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       35. mailto:[139]joshua.smith at lp.org
       36. [140]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       37. [141]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       38. [142]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       39. mailto:[143]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       40. mailto:[144]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       41. mailto:[145]joshua.smith at lp.org
       42. [146]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       43. [147]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       44. [148]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       45. mailto:[149]joshua.smith at lp.org
       46. [150]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       47. [151]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       48. [152]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       49. mailto:[153]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       50. [154]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
       51. mailto:[155]sam.goldstein at lp.org
       52. mailto:[156]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
       53. mailto:[157]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       54. mailto:[158]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       55. mailto:[159]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       56. mailto:[160]joshua.smith at lp.org
       57. [161]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       58. [162]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       59. [163]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       60. mailto:[164]joshua.smith at lp.org
       61. [165]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       62. [166]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       63. [167]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       64. mailto:[168]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       65. mailto:[169]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       66. mailto:[170]joshua.smith at lp.org
       67. [171]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       68. [172]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       69. [173]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       70. mailto:[174]joshua.smith at lp.org
       71. [175]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       72. [176]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       73. [177]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       74. mailto:[178]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       75. [179]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
       76. mailto:[180]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
       77. mailto:[181]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
       78. mailto:[182]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       79. mailto:[183]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       80. mailto:[184]joshua.smith at lp.org
       81. [185]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       82. [186]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       83. [187]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       84. mailto:[188]joshua.smith at lp.org
       85. [189]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       86. [190]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       87. [191]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       88. mailto:[192]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
       89. mailto:[193]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       90. mailto:[194]joshua.smith at lp.org
       91. [195]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       92. [196]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       93. [197]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       94. mailto:[198]joshua.smith at lp.org
       95. [199]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       96. [200]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
       97. mailto:[201]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
       98. [202]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
       99. mailto:[203]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
      100. mailto:[204]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
      101. mailto:[205]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
      102. [206]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
      103. mailto:[207]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
      104. mailto:[208]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
      105. mailto:[209]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
      106. mailto:[210]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


   --
   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [211]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
   3. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
   4. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
   5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   6. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
   7. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   8. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
   9. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  13. https://tinyurl.co/
  14. http://www.lpcolor/
  15. http://ado.org/
  16. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  17. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  19. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  20. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  21. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  22. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  24. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  25. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  26. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  27. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  28. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  29. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  30. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  31. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  32. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
  33. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  34. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  35. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  36. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  38. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  39. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  40. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  41. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  43. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  44. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  45. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  46. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  48. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  49. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  50. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  51. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  52. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  53. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  54. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  55. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  56. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
  57. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
  58. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  59. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  60. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  61. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  63. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  64. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  65. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  66. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  68. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  69. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  70. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  71. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  73. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  74. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  75. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  76. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  77. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  78. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  79. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  80. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
  81. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
  82. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
  83. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  84. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  85. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  87. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  88. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  89. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  90. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  92. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  93. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
  94. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  95. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
  96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  97. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
  98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  99. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 100. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 101. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 102. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 103. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 104. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
 105. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 106. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
 107. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 108. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 109. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 110. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 111. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 112. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 113. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 114. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 115. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 116. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 117. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 118. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 119. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 120. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 121. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 122. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 123. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 124. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 125. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 126. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 127. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 128. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 129. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 130. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
 131. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 132. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 133. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 134. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 135. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 136. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 137. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 138. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 139. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 140. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 141. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 142. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 143. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 144. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 145. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 146. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 147. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 148. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 149. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 150. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 151. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 152. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 153. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 154. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
 155. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
 156. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 157. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 158. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 159. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 160. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 161. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 162. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 163. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 164. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 165. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 166. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 167. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 168. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 169. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 170. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 171. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 172. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 173. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 174. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 175. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 176. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 177. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 178. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 179. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
 180. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
 181. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 182. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 183. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 184. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 185. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 186. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 187. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 188. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 189. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 190. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 191. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 192. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
 193. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 194. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 195. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 196. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 197. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 198. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
 199. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 200. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
 201. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 202. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
 203. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 204. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 205. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
 206. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
 207. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 208. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 209. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 210. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 211. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list