[Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
Elizabeth Van Horn
elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
Fri Jul 20 12:32:43 EDT 2018
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
>> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>> On 2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is up to the
>>> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit we simply
>>> go
>>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business
>>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
>>> not,
>>> could
>>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion and
>>> simply
>>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion? I
>>> want
>>> to
>>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward. I
>>> abstained
>>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
>>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs put
>>> very
>>> simply:
>>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental and
>>> don't
>>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
>>> going
>>> to be
>>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
>>> first
>>> true
>>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
>>> We need to resolve and move forward.
>>> Richard
>>> --
>>> Richard Longstreth
>>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
>>> WA,
>>> WY)
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> [1][2]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 931.538.9300
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[3]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> In Liberty,
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>>> - [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>> We defend your rights
>>> And oppose the use of force
>>> Taxation is theft
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 2. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 4. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
>
> --
>
> IN LIBERTY,
> CARYN ANN HARLOS
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> _We defend your rights_
> _And oppose the use of force_
> _Taxation is theft_
-------------- next part --------------
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
<[1]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is up to
the
> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit we
simply
> go
> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
Lnc-business
> <[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
If
> not,
> could
> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion
and
> simply
> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion?
I
> want
> to
> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward.
I
> abstained
> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> There is no good solution here, but one of may state
chairs put
> very
> simply:
> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental
and
> don't
> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
is
> going
> to be
> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
the
> first
> true
> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> We need to resolve and move forward.
> Richard
> --
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
UT,
> WA,
> WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [1][2][3]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
> References
> 1. mailto:[3][4]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:[6]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 3. mailto:[7]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 4. mailto:[8]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
- [9]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
4. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
8. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
9. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list