[Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
Alicia Mattson
alicia.mattson at lp.org
Sat Jul 21 03:20:53 EDT 2018
JP> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the arguments of r
ules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all the time about
changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but when it comes
down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of hypocritical to
me, actually far more than sort of.
I don't understand how some Libertarians want to tell society that many
things will work much better managed by voluntary agreements rather than by
government, but then don't care about the terms of the voluntary agreement
that is our organizational rules. If we won't follow our own agreements,
that feels hypocritical to me, and it sets a poor example for the product
we're trying to sell.
-Alicia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Shrug. If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would have a 50/50
> shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at it. Some of
> them thought they could win maybe 70%.
>
> So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as good as the
> argument against.
> However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I see, so I fail
> to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just accept it and
> move on, it is what we should have done from the beginning.
> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the arguments of
> rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all the time about
> changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but when it
> comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of
> hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
> So my stance is this. I stand opposed to anything that continues to
> drag this out. I stand opposed to anything other than accepting the
> recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me to be the will
> of vast majority of our constituents. The correct route in my not so
> humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out of the way,
> move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC didn't.
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell [1]217-412-5973
>
> ------ Original message------
> From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
> To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
> Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[2];lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
> They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for them.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
>
> On [3]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> >
> >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>
> >> On [4]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is up to the
> >>> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit we simply
> >>> go
> >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>> -Caryn Ann
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business
> >>> <[1[5]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
> >>> not,
> >>> could
> >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion and
> >>> simply
> >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion? I
> >>> want
> >>> to
> >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward. I
> >>> abstained
> >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs put
> >>> very
> >>> simply:
> >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental and
> >>> don't
> >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
> >>> going
> >>> to be
> >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
> >>> first
> >>> true
> >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>> Richard
> >>> --
> >>> Richard Longstreth
> >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
> >>> WA,
> >>> WY)
> >>> Libertarian National Committee
> >>> [1][2[6]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> [7]931.538.9300
> >>> References
> >>> 1. mailto:[3[8]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>> In Liberty,
> >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >>> - [4][9]Caryn.Ann.[10] Harlos at LP.org or[11] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[12] LPedia at LP.org
> >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>> We defend your rights
> >>> And oppose the use of force
> >>> Taxation is theft
> >>>
> >>> References
> >>>
> >>> 1. mailto[13]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>> 2. mailto[14]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> 3. mailto[15]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> 4. mailto[16]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > --
> >
> > --
> >
> > IN LIBERTY,
> > CARYN ANN HARLOS
> > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
> [17]Caryn.Ann
> .[18] Harlos at LP.org or[19] Secretary at LP.org.
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[20] LPedia at LP.org
> >
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > _We defend your rights_
> > _And oppose the use of force_
> > _Taxation is theft_
> They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for them.
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
>
> On [21]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
> <[1[22]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On [23]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is up to
> the
> > membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit we
> simply
> > go
> > on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> > -Caryn Ann
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> Lnc-business
> > <[1][2[24]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
> If
> > not,
> > could
> > we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion
> and
> > simply
> > not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion?
> I
> > want
> > to
> > fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward.
> I
> > abstained
> > last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> > There is no good solution here, but one of may state
> chairs put
> > very
> > simply:
> > "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental
> and
> > don't
> > really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
> is
> > going
> > to be
> > 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
> the
> > first
> > true
> > membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> > We need to resolve and move forward.
> > Richard
> > --
> > Richard Longstreth
> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
> UT,
> > WA,
> > WY)
> > Libertarian National Committee
> > [1][2][3[25]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > [26]931.538.9300
> > References
> > 1. mailto:[3][4[27]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> > - [4][28]Caryn.Ann.[29] Harlos at LP.org or[30] Secretary at LP.org.
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[31] LPedia at LP.org
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:[5[32]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[6[33]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[7[34]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 4. mailto:[8[35]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> --
>
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [9][36]Caryn.Ann.[37] Harlos at LP.org or[38] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[39] LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto[40]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 2. mailto[41]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. mailto[42]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 4. mailto[43]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 5. mailto[44]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto[45]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 7. mailto[46]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 8. mailto[47]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 9. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> References
>
> 1. tel:217-412-5973
> 2. mailto:;lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. tel:2018-07-20 11
> 4. tel:2018-07-20 08
> 5. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 7. tel:931.538.9300
> 8. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 9. http://Caryn.An/
> 10. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 11. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 12. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 13. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 14. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 15. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 16. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 17. http://Caryn.An/
> 18. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 19. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 20. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 21. tel:2018-07-20 11
> 22. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 23. tel:2018-07-20 08
> 24. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 25. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 26. tel:931.538.9300
> 27. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 28. http://Caryn.An/
> 29. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 30. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 31. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 32. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 33. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 34. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 35. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 36. http://Caryn.An/
> 37. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 38. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 39. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 40. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 41. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 42. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 43. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 44. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 45. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 46. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 47. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
JP> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the arguments
of rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all the time
about changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but when
it comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of
hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
I don't understand how some Libertarians want to tell society that many
things will work much better managed by voluntary agreements rather
than by government, but then don't care about the terms of the
voluntary agreement that is our organizational rules. If we won't
follow our own agreements, that feels hypocritical to me, and it sets a
poor example for the product we're trying to sell.
-Alicia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Shrug. If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would have a
50/50
shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at it. Some
of
them thought they could win maybe 70%.
So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as good as
the
argument against.
However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I see, so
I fail
to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just accept it
and
move on, it is what we should have done from the beginning.
On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the
arguments of
rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all the time
about
changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but when
it
comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of
hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
So my stance is this. I stand opposed to anything that continues
to
drag this out. I stand opposed to anything other than accepting
the
recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me to be
the will
of vast majority of our constituents. The correct route in my
not so
humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out of the
way,
move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC didn't.
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
Cell [1]217-412-5973
------ Original message------
From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[2];[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for
them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [3]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>
>> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>> On [4]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is up
to the
>>> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit we
simply
>>> go
>>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
Lnc-business
>>> <[1[5]][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
>>> not,
>>> could
>>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion and
>>> simply
>>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion? I
>>> want
>>> to
>>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward. I
>>> abstained
>>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
>>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs put
>>> very
>>> simply:
>>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental and
>>> don't
>>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
>>> going
>>> to be
>>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
>>> first
>>> true
>>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
>>> We need to resolve and move forward.
>>> Richard
>>> --
>>> Richard Longstreth
>>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
>>> WA,
>>> WY)
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> [1][2[6]][4]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> [7]931.538.9300
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[3[8]][5]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> In Liberty,
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>>> - [4][9]Caryn.Ann.[10] Harlos at LP.org or[11] Secretary at LP.org.
>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[12] LPedia at LP.org
>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>> We defend your rights
>>> And oppose the use of force
>>> Taxation is theft
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto[13]:[6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 2. mailto[14]:[7]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto[15]:[8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 4. mailto[16]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
>
> --
>
> IN LIBERTY,
> CARYN ANN HARLOS
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
[17]Caryn.Ann
.[18] Harlos at LP.org or[19] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[20] LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> _We defend your rights_
> _And oppose the use of force_
> _Taxation is theft_
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority for
them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [21]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
<[1[22]][9]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [23]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
wrote:
> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is
up to
the
> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit
we
simply
> go
> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
Lnc-business
> <[1][2[24]][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
If
> not,
> could
> we please add it? If not, are we done with that
discussion
and
> simply
> not having a JC or what are the next points of
discussion?
I
> want
> to
> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
forward.
I
> abstained
> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> There is no good solution here, but one of may state
chairs put
> very
> simply:
> "I find this whole debacle with process to be
detrimental
and
> don't
> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
is
> going
> to be
> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
the
> first
> true
> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> We need to resolve and move forward.
> Richard
> --
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
UT,
> WA,
> WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [1][2][3[25]][11]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> [26]931.538.9300
> References
> 1. mailto:[3][4[27]][12]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
> - [4][28]Caryn.Ann.[29] Harlos at LP.org or[30]
Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[31]
LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[5[32]][13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:[6[33]][14]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 3. mailto:[7[34]][15]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 4. mailto:[8[35]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
- [9][36]Caryn.Ann.[37] Harlos at LP.org or[38] Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[39] LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto[40]:[16]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
2. mailto[41]:[17]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto[42]:[18]richard.longstreth at lp.org
4. mailto[43]:[19]richard.longstreth at lp.org
5. mailto[44]:[20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto[45]:[21]richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. mailto[46]:[22]richard.longstreth at lp.org
8. mailto[47]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
9. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. tel:217-412-5973
2. mailto:;[23]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. tel:2018-07-20 11
4. tel:2018-07-20 08
5. mailto:][24]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto:][25]richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. tel:931.538.9300
8. mailto:][26]richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. [27]http://Caryn.An/
10. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
11. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
12. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
13. mailto::[28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
14. mailto::[29]richard.longstreth at lp.org
15. mailto::[30]richard.longstreth at lp.org
16. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
17. [31]http://Caryn.An/
18. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
19. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
20. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
21. tel:2018-07-20 11
22. mailto:][32]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
23. tel:2018-07-20 08
24. mailto:][33]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. mailto:][34]richard.longstreth at lp.org
26. tel:931.538.9300
27. mailto:][35]richard.longstreth at lp.org
28. [36]http://Caryn.An/
29. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
30. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
31. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
32. mailto:][37]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
33. mailto:][38]richard.longstreth at lp.org
34. mailto:][39]richard.longstreth at lp.org
35. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
36. [40]http://Caryn.An/
37. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
38. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
39. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
40. mailto::[41]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
41. mailto::[42]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
42. mailto::[43]richard.longstreth at lp.org
43. mailto::[44]richard.longstreth at lp.org
44. mailto::[45]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
45. mailto::[46]richard.longstreth at lp.org
46. mailto::[47]richard.longstreth at lp.org
47. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
5. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
7. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
11. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
12. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
14. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
15. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
16. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
17. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
18. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
19. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
21. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
22. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
23. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
24. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
26. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
27. http://Caryn.An/
28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
29. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
30. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
31. http://Caryn.An/
32. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
33. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
34. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
35. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
36. http://Caryn.An/
37. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
38. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
39. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
40. http://Caryn.An/
41. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
42. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
43. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
44. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
45. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
46. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
47. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list