[Lnc-business] Fwd: Judicial Committee motions

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Sat Jul 21 04:58:11 EDT 2018


The members can reject them.

My solution solves it all.

A mail ballot of some sorts.

-Caryn Ann

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:02 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

>    This strange posturing by the former Judicial Committee really makes it
>    problematic for us to implement the Not-A-Judicial-Committee Committee,
>    which would be rules compliant.
>    -Alicia
>
>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alicia Mattson
>    <[1]alicia.mattson at lp.org> wrote:
>
>    There are several serious problems with the logic of this communication
>    from Mr. Moulton.
>    I see no ambiguity in Bylaw Article 8.1, which provides that, "The
>    Judicial Committee shall take office immediately upon the close of the
>    Regular Non-Presidential Convention at which elected and shall serve
>    until the final adjournment of the next Regular Non-Presidential
>    Convention."
>    I see no reasonable argument to be made that the 2016-2018 Judicial
>    Committee members held any position from which they could (after
>    convention adjournment on July 3) conduct email votes, fill vacancies,
>    or resign from positions they no longer held.
>    A motion they purported to pass to fill vacancies was contingent on 6
>    people resigning.  But 6 people didn't resign, because Gary Johnson
>    understood he had no position from which to resign, so the
>    fill-the-vacancy motion has no effect because the condition wasn't
>    met.  So all 7 are still on the JC?  Then 5 people purported to resign.
>    With the prior motion failing to meet its condition for effectiveness,
>    the vacancies aren't filled.  Now Gary Johnson and Chuck Moulton are
>    the remaining JC members?
>    So now will Chuck Moulton conduct an email ballot in which only he
>    votes, and Gary Johnson refuses to participate, and will Chuck Moulton
>    fill 6 vacancies or 5?  He can't fill Gary Johnson's spot.  By
>    Moulton's premise, there is no vacancy to fill, because Johnson hasn't
>    resigned.  He can't apply Gary Johnson's premise to Johnson only and
>    say he's no longer on the JC because his term ended at adjournment, but
>    Moulton is somehow still on.  The rules aren't different for Johnson
>    versus the rest of the former JC members.  So how does Moulton come up
>    with a new JC that doesn't include Johnson?
>    Clearly I cannot choose the glass in front of you, and clearly I cannot
>    choose the glass in front of me.  Wait, what's that?! (pointing,
>    switches glasses, but they're both poisoned)
>    Would the JC candidates who stood in front of the delegates on July 3
>    and pledged to apply the rules as written like to now explain how any
>    of this is an example of applying the rules as written?  And how any
>    future rulings from them will apply the rules in an equally rational
>    manner?
>    -Alicia in Wonderland
>
>    On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>    <[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
>         Please see the below communication from Chuck Moulton.
>         Which brings to mind another way to handle.  Since the maybe JC
>      did
>         this outside of our direction - if we refer ratification of this
>      to the
>         delegates my mail - majority vote- we have as legitimate of JC
>      that we
>         are going to get.
>         -Caryn Ann
>         ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>         From: Chuck Moulton <[1][3]chuck at moulton.org>
>         Date: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:41 AM
>         Subject: Judicial Committee motions
>         To: Nick Sarwark <[2][4]chair at lp.org>, Caryn Ann Harlos
>         <[3][5]secretary at lp.org>
>         CC: D Frank Robinson <[4][6]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com>, Chuck
>      Moulton
>         <[5][7]chuck at moulton.org>, Darryl Perry
>      <[6][8]Darryl at darrylwperry.com>, Ruth
>         Bennett <[7][9]bennettruthaz at gmail.com>, Geoff Neale
>         <[8][10]liber8or at austin.rr.com>, Jim Turney
>      <[9][11]LP at jimturney.com>, Tricia
>         Sprankle <[10][12]tricia at spranklelaw.com>, Alicia Dearn
>         <[11][13]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com>, William Hall
>      <[12][14]WHall at wnj.com>,
>         John Buttrick <[13][15]jabuttrick at gmail.com>, Rob Latham
>         <[14][16]freeutahns at gmail.com>, Michael Badnarik
>         <[15][17]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org>, Gary Johnson
>         <[16][18]sedition at aol.com>
>         Chuck Moulton wrote (7/6/2018 at 4:31 pm):
>         > Because no one received a majority vote with approval voting,
>      there
>         is a
>         > controversy as to whether the Judicial Committee was properly
>         elected.
>         >
>         > Without getting into details of the relative merits of each
>         > interpretation, I believe this is an exhaustive list:
>         >
>         > 1. The convention elected all 7 JC members by plurality (the
>      motion
>         to
>         > suspend the rules for at-large applies to JC because our rules
>      say
>         the
>         > JC uses the same method of election as at-large).
>         >
>         > 2. The convention elected 5 JC members by plurality (the motion
>         > referenced above explicitly said the top 5 would be elected by
>         plurality)
>         >
>         > 3. The JC from the previous term continues serving another 2 or
>      4
>         years
>         > (no one received a majority)
>         >
>         > 4. The LNC can appoint the JC (the LNC can fill at-large
>      vacancies,
>         and
>         > our rules say the JC is elected by the same method as at-large)
>         >
>         > 5. We have no JC (no one received a majority and our bylaws say
>      the
>         JC
>         > serves until the final adjournment of the next convention
>      rather than
>         > when the next JC is elected)
>         >
>         > I can't do anything about interpretation #5.
>         >
>         > I am trying my best to at least make the interpretations in #1,
>      #2,
>         #3,
>         > and #4 be the same people so those with different
>      interpretations
>         don't
>         > think we have 4 different JCs.  I believe this will add to the
>         > legitimacy of the JC.
>         Mr. Chair and Ms. Secretary,
>         Please relay the following information to the Libertarian
>      National
>         Committee.  I write both on behalf of the 2016-2018 Judicial
>      Committee
>         and on behalf of the 2018-2020 Judicial Committee.
>         First (to harmonize #3 with #1), the Judicial Committee from the
>         2016-2018 term (which consisted of Michael Badnarik, John
>      Buttrick,
>         Alicia Dearn, Bill Hall, Gary E. Johnson, Rob Latham, and Chuck
>      Moulton
>         with Chuck Moulton serving as chair) passed the following motion
>      by
>         email ballot with a vote of 6-0-1:
>         -----------------------------------------------------------
>      -----------
>         I move that the following people be appointed to the Judicial
>      Committee
>         to fill the 6 vacancies created upon the resignations of 6
>      members of
>         the Judicial Committee:
>         * D. Frank Robinson
>         * Darryl Perry
>         * Ruth Bennett
>         * Geoff Neale
>         * Jim Turney
>         * Tricia Sprankle
>         -----------------------------------------------------------
>      -----------
>         The following members of the old JC submitted letters of
>      resignation
>         contingent on the motion passing:
>         * Alicia Dearn
>         * John Buttrick
>         * Bill Hall
>         * Rob Latham
>         * Michael Badnarik
>         Gary E. Johnson did not respond to emails, participate in the
>      vote, or
>         submit a letter of resignation.  By phone he told me that he is
>      not on
>         the Judicial Committee.  He also believes we have no JC this
>      term.
>         Second (to harmonize #2 with #1), the Judicial Committee which
>      was
>         arguably elected by plurality for the 2016-2018 term under the
>         interpretation that the top 5 (but not the top 7) were elected
>      (which
>         consisted of D. Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth
>         Bennett, and Geoff Neale with Chuck Moulton serving as interim
>      chair)
>         passed the following motion by email ballot with a vote of 5-0-0:
>         -----------------------------------------------------------
>      -----------
>         I move that the following people be appointed to the Judicial
>      Committee
>         to fill the 2 vacancies left on Judicial Committee (if such
>      vacancies
>         exist):
>         * Jim Turney
>         * Tricia Sprankle
>         -----------------------------------------------------------
>      -----------
>         At this point we 7 (D. Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl
>      Perry,
>         Ruth
>         Bennett, Geoff Neale, Jim Turney, and Tricia Sprankle) plan to
>      elect a
>         committee chair and consider rules of appellate procedure to
>      submit to
>         the Libertarian National Committee by the 90 day deadline in
>      bylaw 8.3.
>           We realize that the JC election may still be a mess, but any
>      further
>         resolution is out of our hands.  Therefore, we will proceed as if
>      we
>         were legitimately elected in order to meet bylaws deadlines.
>         Chuck Moulton
>         Interim Chair, 2018-2020 LP Judicial Committee
>         Chair, 2016-2018 LP Judicial Committee
>         --
>         --
>         In Liberty,
>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>         - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>         We defend your rights
>         And oppose the use of force
>         Taxation is theft
>      References
>         1. mailto:[19]chuck at moulton.org
>         2. mailto:[20]chair at lp.org
>         3. mailto:[21]secretary at lp.org
>         4. mailto:[22]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
>         5. mailto:[23]chuck at moulton.org
>         6. mailto:[24]Darryl at darrylwperry.com
>         7. mailto:[25]bennettruthaz at gmail.com
>         8. mailto:[26]liber8or at austin.rr.com
>         9. mailto:[27]LP at jimturney.com
>        10. mailto:[28]tricia at spranklelaw.com
>        11. mailto:[29]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
>        12. mailto:[30]WHall at wnj.com
>        13. mailto:[31]jabuttrick at gmail.com
>        14. mailto:[32]freeutahns at gmail.com
>        15. mailto:[33]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
>        16. mailto:[34]sedition at aol.com
>        17. mailto:[35]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
>    2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>    3. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
>    4. mailto:chair at lp.org
>    5. mailto:secretary at lp.org
>    6. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
>    7. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
>    8. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
>    9. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
>   10. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
>   11. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
>   12. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
>   13. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
>   14. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
>   15. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
>   16. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
>   17. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
>   18. mailto:sedition at aol.com
>   19. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
>   20. mailto:chair at lp.org
>   21. mailto:secretary at lp.org
>   22. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
>   23. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
>   24. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
>   25. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
>   26. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
>   27. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
>   28. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
>   29. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
>   30. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
>   31. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
>   32. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
>   33. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
>   34. mailto:sedition at aol.com
>   35. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   The members can reject them.
   My solution solves it all.
   A mail ballot of some sorts.
   -Caryn Ann
   On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:02 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

        This strange posturing by the former Judicial Committee really
     makes it
        problematic for us to implement the Not-A-Judicial-Committee
     Committee,
        which would be rules compliant.
        -Alicia
        On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alicia Mattson
        <[1][2]alicia.mattson at lp.org> wrote:
        There are several serious problems with the logic of this
     communication
        from Mr. Moulton.
        I see no ambiguity in Bylaw Article 8.1, which provides that,
     "The
        Judicial Committee shall take office immediately upon the close
     of the
        Regular Non-Presidential Convention at which elected and shall
     serve
        until the final adjournment of the next Regular Non-Presidential
        Convention."
        I see no reasonable argument to be made that the 2016-2018
     Judicial
        Committee members held any position from which they could (after
        convention adjournment on July 3) conduct email votes, fill
     vacancies,
        or resign from positions they no longer held.
        A motion they purported to pass to fill vacancies was contingent
     on 6
        people resigning.  But 6 people didn't resign, because Gary
     Johnson
        understood he had no position from which to resign, so the
        fill-the-vacancy motion has no effect because the condition
     wasn't
        met.  So all 7 are still on the JC?  Then 5 people purported to
     resign.
        With the prior motion failing to meet its condition for
     effectiveness,
        the vacancies aren't filled.  Now Gary Johnson and Chuck Moulton
     are
        the remaining JC members?
        So now will Chuck Moulton conduct an email ballot in which only
     he
        votes, and Gary Johnson refuses to participate, and will Chuck
     Moulton
        fill 6 vacancies or 5?  He can't fill Gary Johnson's spot.  By
        Moulton's premise, there is no vacancy to fill, because Johnson
     hasn't
        resigned.  He can't apply Gary Johnson's premise to Johnson only
     and
        say he's no longer on the JC because his term ended at
     adjournment, but
        Moulton is somehow still on.  The rules aren't different for
     Johnson
        versus the rest of the former JC members.  So how does Moulton
     come up
        with a new JC that doesn't include Johnson?
        Clearly I cannot choose the glass in front of you, and clearly I
     cannot
        choose the glass in front of me.  Wait, what's that?! (pointing,
        switches glasses, but they're both poisoned)
        Would the JC candidates who stood in front of the delegates on
     July 3
        and pledged to apply the rules as written like to now explain how
     any
        of this is an example of applying the rules as written?  And how
     any
        future rulings from them will apply the rules in an equally
     rational
        manner?
        -Alicia in Wonderland
        On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos via
     Lnc-business
        <[2][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
             Please see the below communication from Chuck Moulton.
             Which brings to mind another way to handle.  Since the maybe
     JC
          did
             this outside of our direction - if we refer ratification of
     this
          to the
             delegates my mail - majority vote- we have as legitimate of
     JC
          that we
             are going to get.
             -Caryn Ann
             ---------- Forwarded message ---------
             From: Chuck Moulton <[1][3][4]chuck at moulton.org>
             Date: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:41 AM
             Subject: Judicial Committee motions
             To: Nick Sarwark <[2][4][5]chair at lp.org>, Caryn Ann Harlos
             <[3][5][6]secretary at lp.org>
             CC: D Frank Robinson <[4][6][7]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com>,
     Chuck
          Moulton
             <[5][7][8]chuck at moulton.org>, Darryl Perry
          <[6][8][9]Darryl at darrylwperry.com>, Ruth
             Bennett <[7][9][10]bennettruthaz at gmail.com>, Geoff Neale
             <[8][10][11]liber8or at austin.rr.com>, Jim Turney
          <[9][11][12]LP at jimturney.com>, Tricia
             Sprankle <[10][12][13]tricia at spranklelaw.com>, Alicia Dearn
             <[11][13][14]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com>, William Hall
          <[12][14][15]WHall at wnj.com>,
             John Buttrick <[13][15][16]jabuttrick at gmail.com>, Rob Latham
             <[14][16][17]freeutahns at gmail.com>, Michael Badnarik
             <[15][17][18]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org>, Gary
     Johnson
             <[16][18][19]sedition at aol.com>
             Chuck Moulton wrote (7/6/2018 at 4:31 pm):
             > Because no one received a majority vote with approval
     voting,
          there
             is a
             > controversy as to whether the Judicial Committee was
     properly
             elected.
             >
             > Without getting into details of the relative merits of
     each
             > interpretation, I believe this is an exhaustive list:
             >
             > 1. The convention elected all 7 JC members by plurality
     (the
          motion
             to
             > suspend the rules for at-large applies to JC because our
     rules
          say
             the
             > JC uses the same method of election as at-large).
             >
             > 2. The convention elected 5 JC members by plurality (the
     motion
             > referenced above explicitly said the top 5 would be
     elected by
             plurality)
             >
             > 3. The JC from the previous term continues serving another
     2 or
          4
             years
             > (no one received a majority)
             >
             > 4. The LNC can appoint the JC (the LNC can fill at-large
          vacancies,
             and
             > our rules say the JC is elected by the same method as
     at-large)
             >
             > 5. We have no JC (no one received a majority and our
     bylaws say
          the
             JC
             > serves until the final adjournment of the next convention
          rather than
             > when the next JC is elected)
             >
             > I can't do anything about interpretation #5.
             >
             > I am trying my best to at least make the interpretations
     in #1,
          #2,
             #3,
             > and #4 be the same people so those with different
          interpretations
             don't
             > think we have 4 different JCs.  I believe this will add to
     the
             > legitimacy of the JC.
             Mr. Chair and Ms. Secretary,
             Please relay the following information to the Libertarian
          National
             Committee.  I write both on behalf of the 2016-2018 Judicial
          Committee
             and on behalf of the 2018-2020 Judicial Committee.
             First (to harmonize #3 with #1), the Judicial Committee from
     the
             2016-2018 term (which consisted of Michael Badnarik, John
          Buttrick,
             Alicia Dearn, Bill Hall, Gary E. Johnson, Rob Latham, and
     Chuck
          Moulton
             with Chuck Moulton serving as chair) passed the following
     motion
          by
             email ballot with a vote of 6-0-1:
             -----------------------------------------------------------
          -----------
             I move that the following people be appointed to the
     Judicial
          Committee
             to fill the 6 vacancies created upon the resignations of 6
          members of
             the Judicial Committee:
             * D. Frank Robinson
             * Darryl Perry
             * Ruth Bennett
             * Geoff Neale
             * Jim Turney
             * Tricia Sprankle
             -----------------------------------------------------------
          -----------
             The following members of the old JC submitted letters of
          resignation
             contingent on the motion passing:
             * Alicia Dearn
             * John Buttrick
             * Bill Hall
             * Rob Latham
             * Michael Badnarik
             Gary E. Johnson did not respond to emails, participate in
     the
          vote, or
             submit a letter of resignation.  By phone he told me that he
     is
          not on
             the Judicial Committee.  He also believes we have no JC this
          term.
             Second (to harmonize #2 with #1), the Judicial Committee
     which
          was
             arguably elected by plurality for the 2016-2018 term under
     the
             interpretation that the top 5 (but not the top 7) were
     elected
          (which
             consisted of D. Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry,
     Ruth
             Bennett, and Geoff Neale with Chuck Moulton serving as
     interim
          chair)
             passed the following motion by email ballot with a vote of
     5-0-0:
             -----------------------------------------------------------
          -----------
             I move that the following people be appointed to the
     Judicial
          Committee
             to fill the 2 vacancies left on Judicial Committee (if such
          vacancies
             exist):
             * Jim Turney
             * Tricia Sprankle
             -----------------------------------------------------------
          -----------
             At this point we 7 (D. Frank Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl
          Perry,
             Ruth
             Bennett, Geoff Neale, Jim Turney, and Tricia Sprankle) plan
     to
          elect a
             committee chair and consider rules of appellate procedure to
          submit to
             the Libertarian National Committee by the 90 day deadline in
          bylaw 8.3.
               We realize that the JC election may still be a mess, but
     any
          further
             resolution is out of our hands.  Therefore, we will proceed
     as if
          we
             were legitimately elected in order to meet bylaws deadlines.
             Chuck Moulton
             Interim Chair, 2018-2020 LP Judicial Committee
             Chair, 2016-2018 LP Judicial Committee
             --
             --
             In Liberty,
             Caryn Ann Harlos
             Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
             - [17]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
             Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
             A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
             We defend your rights
             And oppose the use of force
             Taxation is theft
          References
             1. mailto:[19][20]chuck at moulton.org
             2. mailto:[20][21]chair at lp.org
             3. mailto:[21][22]secretary at lp.org
             4. mailto:[22][23]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
             5. mailto:[23][24]chuck at moulton.org
             6. mailto:[24][25]Darryl at darrylwperry.com
             7. mailto:[25][26]bennettruthaz at gmail.com
             8. mailto:[26][27]liber8or at austin.rr.com
             9. mailto:[27][28]LP at jimturney.com
            10. mailto:[28][29]tricia at spranklelaw.com
            11. mailto:[29][30]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
            12. mailto:[30][31]WHall at wnj.com
            13. mailto:[31][32]jabuttrick at gmail.com
            14. mailto:[32][33]freeutahns at gmail.com
            15. mailto:[33][34]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
            16. mailto:[34][35]sedition at aol.com
            17. mailto:[35]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     References
        1. mailto:[36]alicia.mattson at lp.org
        2. mailto:[37]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
        3. mailto:[38]chuck at moulton.org
        4. mailto:[39]chair at lp.org
        5. mailto:[40]secretary at lp.org
        6. mailto:[41]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
        7. mailto:[42]chuck at moulton.org
        8. mailto:[43]Darryl at darrylwperry.com
        9. mailto:[44]bennettruthaz at gmail.com
       10. mailto:[45]liber8or at austin.rr.com
       11. mailto:[46]LP at jimturney.com
       12. mailto:[47]tricia at spranklelaw.com
       13. mailto:[48]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
       14. mailto:[49]WHall at wnj.com
       15. mailto:[50]jabuttrick at gmail.com
       16. mailto:[51]freeutahns at gmail.com
       17. mailto:[52]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
       18. mailto:[53]sedition at aol.com
       19. mailto:[54]chuck at moulton.org
       20. mailto:[55]chair at lp.org
       21. mailto:[56]secretary at lp.org
       22. mailto:[57]dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
       23. mailto:[58]chuck at moulton.org
       24. mailto:[59]Darryl at darrylwperry.com
       25. mailto:[60]bennettruthaz at gmail.com
       26. mailto:[61]liber8or at austin.rr.com
       27. mailto:[62]LP at jimturney.com
       28. mailto:[63]tricia at spranklelaw.com
       29. mailto:[64]aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
       30. mailto:[65]WHall at wnj.com
       31. mailto:[66]jabuttrick at gmail.com
       32. mailto:[67]freeutahns at gmail.com
       33. mailto:[68]scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
       34. mailto:[69]sedition at aol.com
       35. mailto:[70]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org

   --

   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [71]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
   3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
   5. mailto:chair at lp.org
   6. mailto:secretary at lp.org
   7. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
   8. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
   9. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
  10. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
  11. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
  12. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
  13. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
  14. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
  15. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
  16. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
  17. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
  18. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
  19. mailto:sedition at aol.com
  20. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  21. mailto:chair at lp.org
  22. mailto:secretary at lp.org
  23. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
  24. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  25. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
  26. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
  27. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
  28. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
  29. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
  30. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
  31. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
  32. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
  33. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
  34. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
  35. mailto:sedition at aol.com
  36. mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
  37. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  38. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  39. mailto:chair at lp.org
  40. mailto:secretary at lp.org
  41. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
  42. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  43. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
  44. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
  45. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
  46. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
  47. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
  48. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
  49. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
  50. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
  51. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
  52. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
  53. mailto:sedition at aol.com
  54. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  55. mailto:chair at lp.org
  56. mailto:secretary at lp.org
  57. mailto:dfrank_robinson at yahoo.com
  58. mailto:chuck at moulton.org
  59. mailto:Darryl at darrylwperry.com
  60. mailto:bennettruthaz at gmail.com
  61. mailto:liber8or at austin.rr.com
  62. mailto:LP at jimturney.com
  63. mailto:tricia at spranklelaw.com
  64. mailto:aliciadearn at bellatrixlaw.com
  65. mailto:WHall at wnj.com
  66. mailto:jabuttrick at gmail.com
  67. mailto:freeutahns at gmail.com
  68. mailto:scholar at constitutionpreservation.org
  69. mailto:sedition at aol.com
  70. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  71. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list