[Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix

john.phillips at lp.org john.phillips at lp.org
Sat Jul 21 16:40:41 EDT 2018


Agreed
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
Cell 217-412-5973
------ Original message------From: Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-businessDate: Sat, Jul 21, 2018 11:34 AMTo: lnc-business at hq.lp.org;Cc: Caryn Ann Harlos;Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
The right to elect a JC was not knowingly waived.  The Party exists to give
voice to and implement the Statement of Principles.  The JC insures that.

Having no JC is absolutely against the REST of the Bylaws.

And I sure hope we never have to disaffiliate a state party in the coming
two years as they have NO APPEAL.

Want to see the Party implode?  That is how you see the Party implode.

-Caryn Ann


On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:20 AM Craig Bowden via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> We have been going over this, in circles, for two weeks. The facts are
> the there were several balls dropped and we have no authority to do
> anything, including a re-ballot.
>
> Article 8(1): "The Judicial Committee shall be composed of seven Party
> members elected at each Regular
> Convention..." While I understand this has been changed to reflect
> non-Presidential years, the reality is that we do not have the authority
> to send out a ballot outside of a Regular convention under our bylaws.
>
> We are going to have to deal with this at a Regular Convention. That is
> the reality. That is the hard bullet that we all must bite for our parts
> in the failure. Whether we didn't raise objections, didn't stay on the
> floor, or moved to adjourn before addressing.
>
> This is what we must accept. There is no JC.
>
> Craig Bowden
> Region 1 Alternate
>
>
>
> On 2018-07-21 10:00, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> > Actually, I think rejection of the one which "exists" is recognition
> > that one was not elected and you can't just dictatorially say that
> > because you were in the top seven in the voting at the convention you
> > are now the JC.  It is a violation of the Bylaws.  I challenge their
> > legitimacy.  Same argument against us acknowledging them is in place
> > here - there was no proper election of them at convention.
> >
> > -Brent
> >
> > On 2018-07-20 21:47, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business wrote:
> >> I dont understand. Is your Region refusing to acknowledge that there
> >> is
> >>    a JC? Is it passive denial or a rejection of the one that exists?
> >> The
> >>    distinction is quite important because one does exist and a
> >> rejection
> >>    is, in essence, a rejection of a part of the national party.
> >>
> >>    Richard
> >>
> >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 21:11 Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>    <[1]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>    I'd replied to John Phillips, he's the Region 6 rep.
> >>    Also, I've already stated my position.  I'd wanted to have the LNC
> >>    approve the top seven, I co-sponsored that motion.  Only, when took
> >> the
> >>    discussion to my region, multiple members, including officers,
> >> state
> >>    chairs, VCs, etc, of Region 3 were adamant that under our bylaws
> >>    there's no JC, and no way to get one.  Me stating this on the LNC
> >> email
> >>    list is just that, me stating what my region has said, and wants.
> >>    I've no idea why you're making comments about "do not turn this
> >>    personal"??  I've said nothing personal. Don't project onto me.
> >>    What I have done is point out that another regional rep isn't
> >> speaking
> >>    for my region.
> >>    As for my reply to the LNC Secretary, the same.  An officer has a
> >>    particular role, otherwise, they have one vote, same as anyone on
> >> the
> >>    LNC.  The LNC secretary asked people to confer with the registered
> >>    parliamentarian, and I have, and I've also read his views on this
> >>    subject.  I went through the bylaws carefully, and got feedback
> >> from an
> >>    officer in my own state affiliate, officers from the other state
> >>    affiliates in my region, etc.  My statements are the result of
> >>    listening to the members in my region.  I've done due diligence on
> >> this
> >>    issue. I've not going to take the time to listen to my region, and
> >> then
> >>    ignore them.
> >>    My representation and advocacy is for my region.
> >>    ---
> >>    Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>
> >>    On 2018-07-20 18:10, Richard Longstreth wrote:
> >>
> >>    My Region says that the Top 7 should be and we should move on. We
> >>    cannot simply "You do your region, and I'll do mine."
> >>    First off, the person you said that to is an Officer. Therefore,
> >> her
> >>    Region in is the entirety of membership and she IS expressing her
> >>    thoughts from her 'region'. Your words give off the air of
> >> flippancy
> >>    and are borderline offensive to me as one whom the comments were
> >> not
> >>    directed toward. This is not how we should be interacting as
> >> officers
> >>    and certainly not a way to advance the Party. We need to work
> >> together,
> >>    not have an attitude of every region for themselves.
> >>
> >>    Secondly, there is a difference between our Regions, EVH. Mine says
> >>    that the Top 7 are the JC yours says that we don't have a JC. Both
> >>    situations cannot exist simultaneously and this NEEDS to be
> >> resolved
> >>    and finalized for all members. I cannot tell my states that a JC
> >> exists
> >>    for Region 1 but not for Region 3; that is absurd.
> >>
> >>    Finally, I have dropped this discussion if we acknowledge that the
> >> JC
> >>    exists and is the Top 7 - something I abstained from orginally, but
> >> see
> >>    as the only logical solution going forward. If not, we need to
> >> discuss
> >>    this further which is the will of neither of our regions or that of
> >> the
> >>    general membership. Most want to move on from the issue. The LNC as
> >> a
> >>    body did not approve the Top 7. The former JC came up with a
> >> solution
> >>    and that is to put the Top 7 in place. If we, as an LNC or Regional
> >>    Representative do not acknowledge that solution we are creating a
> >> deep
> >>    divide in the Party.
> >>
> >>    Thoughts? Please do not turn this personal. I want to work with you
> >> to
> >>    find a resolution that suits all parties involved.
> >>
> >>    Richard
> >>
> >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM Elizabeth Van Horn via
> >> Lnc-business
> >>    <[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>         I was in favor of the LNC approving the top seven JC
> >> candidates.
> >>      But,
> >>         my region isn't, and leadership has let me know that they
> >> think
> >>      there's
> >>         no JC.
> >>         I'm not sure what you're going on about. I'm not arguing. Nor,
> >> am
> >>      I
> >>         doing anything, other than stating what my region thinks.
> >>         You do your region, and I'll do mine.
> >>         ---
> >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> >>         Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> >>         LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> >>         Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> >>         [1][3]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>         On 2018-07-20 13:26, [4]john.phillips at lp.org wrote:
> >>         Shrug.  If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would have
> >> a
> >>      50/50
> >>         shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at it.
> >> Some
> >>      of
> >>         them thought they could win maybe 70%.
> >>         So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as good
> >> as
> >>      the
> >>         argument against.
> >>         However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I see,
> >> so
> >>      I fail
> >>         to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just accept
> >> it
> >>      and
> >>         move on, it is what we should have done from the beginning.
> >>         On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians?  I find the
> >>      arguments of
> >>         rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic.  We argue all the
> >> time
> >>      about
> >>         changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but
> >> when
> >>      it
> >>         comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of
> >>         hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
> >>         So my stance is this.  I stand opposed to anything that
> >> continues
> >>      to
> >>         drag this out.  I stand opposed to anything other than
> >> accepting
> >>      the
> >>         recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me to be
> >>      the will
> >>         of vast majority of our constituents.  The correct route in my
> >>      not so
> >>         humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out of the
> >>      way,
> >>         move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC didn't.
> >>         John Phillips
> >>         Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> >>         Cell [2]217-412-5973
> >>         ------ Original message------
> >>         From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> >>         Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
> >>         To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
> >>         Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[3];[5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> >>         Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
> >>      They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority for
> >>      them.
> >>      ---
> >>      Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>      On [4]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> >>      > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >>      >
> >>      > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn  wrote:
> >>      >
> >>      >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>      >>
> >>      >> ---
> >>      >> Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>      >>
> >>      >> On [5]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> >> wrote:
> >>      >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is
> >> up
> >>      to the
> >>      >>> membership to complain about that if they wish.  I submit we
> >>      simply
> >>      >>> go
> >>      >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>      >>> -Caryn Ann
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> >>      Lnc-business
> >>      >>> <[1[6]][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
> >>      >>> not,
> >>      >>> could
> >>      >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion
> >> and
> >>      >>> simply
> >>      >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion? I
> >>      >>> want
> >>      >>> to
> >>      >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward. I
> >>      >>> abstained
> >>      >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> >>      >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs
> >> put
> >>      >>> very
> >>      >>> simply:
> >>      >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental and
> >>      >>> don't
> >>      >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
> >>      >>> going
> >>      >>> to be
> >>      >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
> >>      >>> first
> >>      >>> true
> >>      >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>      >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>      >>> Richard
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> Richard Longstreth
> >>      >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
> >>      >>> WA,
> >>      >>> WY)
> >>      >>> Libertarian National Committee
> >>      >>> [1][2[7]][7]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> [8]931.538.9300
> >>      >>> References
> >>      >>> 1. mailto:[3[9]][8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> In Liberty,
> >>      >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>      >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> >> Secretary
> >>      >>> - [4][10]Caryn.Ann.[11] Harlos at LP.org or[12]
> >> Secretary at LP.org.
> >>      >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[13]
> >> LPedia at LP.org
> >>      >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>      >>> We defend your rights
> >>      >>> And oppose the use of force
> >>      >>> Taxation is theft
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> References
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> 1. mailto[14]:[9]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>      >>> 2. mailto[15]:[10]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> 3. mailto[16]:[11]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> 4. mailto[17]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>      > --
> >>      >
> >>      > --
> >>      >
> >>      > IN LIBERTY,
> >>      > CARYN ANN HARLOS
> >>      > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >> -
> >>      [18]Caryn.Ann
> >>      .[19] Harlos at LP.org or[20] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>      > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[21] LPedia at LP.org
> >>      >
> >>      > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>      > _We defend your rights_
> >>      > _And oppose the use of force_
> >>      > _Taxation is theft_
> >>         They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority
> >> for
> >>      them.
> >>         ---
> >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         On [22]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> >>         There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >>         On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         <[1[23]][12]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> >>           There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>           ---
> >>           Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>           On [24]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> >>      wrote:
> >>           > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it
> >> is
> >>      up to
> >>           the
> >>           >    membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
> >> submit
> >>      we
> >>           simply
> >>           > go
> >>           >    on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>           >    -Caryn Ann
> >>           >
> >>           >    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> >>           Lnc-business
> >>           >    <[1][2[25]][13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>           >
> >>           >         I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in
> >>      Phoenix.
> >>           If
> >>           > not,
> >>           >      could
> >>           >         we please add it? If not, are we done with that
> >>      discussion
> >>           and
> >>           >      simply
> >>           >         not having a JC or what are the next points of
> >>      discussion?
> >>           I
> >>           > want
> >>           >      to
> >>           >         fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
> >>      forward.
> >>           I
> >>           >      abstained
> >>           >         last vote to approve but my mind is still not
> >>      settled.
> >>           >         There is no good solution here, but one of may
> >> state
> >>           chairs put
> >>           >      very
> >>           >         simply:
> >>           >         "I find this whole debacle with process to be
> >>      detrimental
> >>           and
> >>           >      don't
> >>           >         really care one way or the other how it pans out.
> >>      Nobody
> >>           is
> >>           > going
> >>           >      to be
> >>           >         100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on
> >> some
> >>      of
> >>           the
> >>           > first
> >>           >      true
> >>           >         membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>           >         We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>           >         Richard
> >>           >         --
> >>           >         Richard Longstreth
> >>           >         Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM,
> >> OR,
> >>      HI,
> >>           UT,
> >>           > WA,
> >>           >      WY)
> >>           >         Libertarian National Committee
> >>           >         [1][2][3[26]][14]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >         [27]931.538.9300
> >>           >      References
> >>           >         1. mailto:[3][4[28]][15]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >
> >>           >    --
> >>           >    --
> >>           >    In Liberty,
> >>           >    Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>           >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> >>      Secretary
> >>           >    - [4][29]Caryn.Ann.[30] Harlos at LP.org or[31]
> >>      Secretary at LP.org.
> >>           >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[32]
> >>      LPedia at LP.org
> >>           >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>           >    We defend your rights
> >>           >    And oppose the use of force
> >>           >    Taxation is theft
> >>           >
> >>           > References
> >>           >
> >>           >    1. mailto:[5[33]][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>           >    2. mailto:[6[34]][17]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >    3. mailto:[7[35]][18]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >    4. mailto:[8[36]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>           --
> >>         --
> >>         In Liberty,
> >>         Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >>         - [9][37]Caryn.Ann.[38] Harlos at LP.org or[39] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[40]
> >> LPedia at LP.org
> >>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>         We defend your rights
> >>         And oppose the use of force
> >>         Taxation is theft
> >>      References
> >>         1. mailto[41]:[19]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>         2. mailto[42]:[20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         3. mailto[43]:[21]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         4. mailto[44]:[22]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         5. mailto[45]:[23]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         6. mailto[46]:[24]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         7. mailto[47]:[25]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         8. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>         9. mailto[49]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>      References
> >>         1. [26]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>         2. tel:[27]217-412-5973
> >>         3. mailto:;[28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         4. tel:2018-07-20 11
> >>         5. tel:2018-07-20 08
> >>         6. mailto:][29]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         7. mailto:][30]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         8. tel:[31]931.538.9300
> >>         9. mailto:][32]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        10. [33]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        11. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> >>        12. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        13. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> >>        14. mailto::[34]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        15. mailto::[35]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        16. mailto::[36]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        17. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        18. [37]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        19. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> >>        20. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        21. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> >>        22. tel:2018-07-20 11
> >>        23. mailto:][38]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>        24. tel:2018-07-20 08
> >>        25. mailto:][39]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        26. mailto:][40]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        27. tel:[41]931.538.9300
> >>        28. mailto:][42]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        29. [43]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        30. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> >>        31. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        32. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> >>        33. mailto:][44]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        34. mailto:][45]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        35. mailto:][46]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        36. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        37. [47]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        38. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> >>        39. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        40. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> >>        41. mailto::[48]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>        42. mailto::[49]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        43. mailto::[50]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        44. mailto::[51]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        45. mailto::[52]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        46. mailto::[53]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        47. mailto::[54]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        49. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>
> >>      --
> >>
> >>    Richard Longstreth
> >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
> >> WY)
> >>    Libertarian National Committee
> >>    [55]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    931.538.9300
> >>
> >>    --
> >>
> >>    Richard Longstreth
> >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
> >> WY)
> >>    Libertarian National Committee
> >>    [56]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    931.538.9300
> >>
> >> References
> >>
> >>    1. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>    2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    3. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>    4. mailto:john.phillips at lp.org
> >>    5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    7. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    9. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   10. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   11. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   12. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   14. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   15. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   17. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   18. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   19. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   21. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   22. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   23. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   24. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   25. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   26. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>   27. tel:(217) 412-5973
> >>   28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   29. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   30. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   31. tel:(931) 538-9300
> >>   32. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   33. http://Caryn.An/
> >>   34. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   35. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   36. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   37. http://Caryn.An/
> >>   38. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   39. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   40. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   41. tel:(931) 538-9300
> >>   42. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   43. http://Caryn.An/
> >>   44. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   45. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   46. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   47. http://Caryn.An/
> >>   48. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   49. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   50. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   51. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   52. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   53. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   54. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   55. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   56. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org  or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*

   The right to elect a JC was not knowingly waived.  The Party exists to
   give voice to and implement the Statement of Principles.  The JC
   insures that.

   Having no JC is absolutely against the REST of the Bylaws.

   And I sure hope we never have to disaffiliate a state party in the
   coming two years as they have NO APPEAL.

   Want to see the Party implode?  That is how you see the Party implode.

   -Caryn Ann

   On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:20 AM Craig Bowden via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

     We have been going over this, in circles, for two weeks. The facts
     are
     the there were several balls dropped and we have no authority to do
     anything, including a re-ballot.
     Article 8(1): "The Judicial Committee shall be composed of seven
     Party
     members elected at each Regular
     Convention..." While I understand this has been changed to reflect
     non-Presidential years, the reality is that we do not have the
     authority
     to send out a ballot outside of a Regular convention under our
     bylaws.
     We are going to have to deal with this at a Regular Convention. That
     is
     the reality. That is the hard bullet that we all must bite for our
     parts
     in the failure. Whether we didn't raise objections, didn't stay on
     the
     floor, or moved to adjourn before addressing.
     This is what we must accept. There is no JC.
     Craig Bowden
     Region 1 Alternate
     On 2018-07-21 10:00, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business wrote:
     > Actually, I think rejection of the one which "exists" is
     recognition
     > that one was not elected and you can't just dictatorially say that
     > because you were in the top seven in the voting at the convention
     you
     > are now the JC.  It is a violation of the Bylaws.  I challenge
     their
     > legitimacy.  Same argument against us acknowledging them is in
     place
     > here - there was no proper election of them at convention.
     >
     > -Brent
     >
     > On 2018-07-20 21:47, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business wrote:
     >> I dont understand. Is your Region refusing to acknowledge that
     there
     >> is
     >>    a JC? Is it passive denial or a rejection of the one that
     exists?
     >> The
     >>    distinction is quite important because one does exist and a
     >> rejection
     >>    is, in essence, a rejection of a part of the national party.
     >>
     >>    Richard
     >>
     >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 21:11 Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>    <[1][2]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
     >>
     >>    I'd replied to John Phillips, he's the Region 6 rep.
     >>    Also, I've already stated my position.  I'd wanted to have the
     LNC
     >>    approve the top seven, I co-sponsored that motion.  Only, when
     took
     >> the
     >>    discussion to my region, multiple members, including officers,
     >> state
     >>    chairs, VCs, etc, of Region 3 were adamant that under our
     bylaws
     >>    there's no JC, and no way to get one.  Me stating this on the
     LNC
     >> email
     >>    list is just that, me stating what my region has said, and
     wants.
     >>    I've no idea why you're making comments about "do not turn
     this
     >>    personal"??  I've said nothing personal. Don't project onto
     me.
     >>    What I have done is point out that another regional rep isn't
     >> speaking
     >>    for my region.
     >>    As for my reply to the LNC Secretary, the same.  An officer
     has a
     >>    particular role, otherwise, they have one vote, same as anyone
     on
     >> the
     >>    LNC.  The LNC secretary asked people to confer with the
     registered
     >>    parliamentarian, and I have, and I've also read his views on
     this
     >>    subject.  I went through the bylaws carefully, and got
     feedback
     >> from an
     >>    officer in my own state affiliate, officers from the other
     state
     >>    affiliates in my region, etc.  My statements are the result of
     >>    listening to the members in my region.  I've done due
     diligence on
     >> this
     >>    issue. I've not going to take the time to listen to my region,
     and
     >> then
     >>    ignore them.
     >>    My representation and advocacy is for my region.
     >>    ---
     >>    Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>
     >>    On 2018-07-20 18:10, Richard Longstreth wrote:
     >>
     >>    My Region says that the Top 7 should be and we should move on.
     We
     >>    cannot simply "You do your region, and I'll do mine."
     >>    First off, the person you said that to is an Officer.
     Therefore,
     >> her
     >>    Region in is the entirety of membership and she IS expressing
     her
     >>    thoughts from her 'region'. Your words give off the air of
     >> flippancy
     >>    and are borderline offensive to me as one whom the comments
     were
     >> not
     >>    directed toward. This is not how we should be interacting as
     >> officers
     >>    and certainly not a way to advance the Party. We need to work
     >> together,
     >>    not have an attitude of every region for themselves.
     >>
     >>    Secondly, there is a difference between our Regions, EVH. Mine
     says
     >>    that the Top 7 are the JC yours says that we don't have a JC.
     Both
     >>    situations cannot exist simultaneously and this NEEDS to be
     >> resolved
     >>    and finalized for all members. I cannot tell my states that a
     JC
     >> exists
     >>    for Region 1 but not for Region 3; that is absurd.
     >>
     >>    Finally, I have dropped this discussion if we acknowledge that
     the
     >> JC
     >>    exists and is the Top 7 - something I abstained from
     orginally, but
     >> see
     >>    as the only logical solution going forward. If not, we need to
     >> discuss
     >>    this further which is the will of neither of our regions or
     that of
     >> the
     >>    general membership. Most want to move on from the issue. The
     LNC as
     >> a
     >>    body did not approve the Top 7. The former JC came up with a
     >> solution
     >>    and that is to put the Top 7 in place. If we, as an LNC or
     Regional
     >>    Representative do not acknowledge that solution we are
     creating a
     >> deep
     >>    divide in the Party.
     >>
     >>    Thoughts? Please do not turn this personal. I want to work
     with you
     >> to
     >>    find a resolution that suits all parties involved.
     >>
     >>    Richard
     >>
     >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM Elizabeth Van Horn via
     >> Lnc-business
     >>    <[2][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>
     >>         I was in favor of the LNC approving the top seven JC
     >> candidates.
     >>      But,
     >>         my region isn't, and leadership has let me know that they
     >> think
     >>      there's
     >>         no JC.
     >>         I'm not sure what you're going on about. I'm not arguing.
     Nor,
     >> am
     >>      I
     >>         doing anything, other than stating what my region thinks.
     >>         You do your region, and I'll do mine.
     >>         ---
     >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
     >>         Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
     >>         LP Social Media Process Review Committee
     >>         Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
     >>         [1][3][4]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>         On 2018-07-20 13:26, [4][5]john.phillips at lp.org wrote:
     >>         Shrug.  If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would
     have
     >> a
     >>      50/50
     >>         shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at
     it.
     >> Some
     >>      of
     >>         them thought they could win maybe 70%.
     >>         So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as
     good
     >> as
     >>      the
     >>         argument against.
     >>         However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I
     see,
     >> so
     >>      I fail
     >>         to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just
     accept
     >> it
     >>      and
     >>         move on, it is what we should have done from the
     beginning.
     >>         On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians?  I find the
     >>      arguments of
     >>         rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic.  We argue all
     the
     >> time
     >>      about
     >>         changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem,
     but
     >> when
     >>      it
     >>         comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems
     sort of
     >>         hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
     >>         So my stance is this.  I stand opposed to anything that
     >> continues
     >>      to
     >>         drag this out.  I stand opposed to anything other than
     >> accepting
     >>      the
     >>         recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me
     to be
     >>      the will
     >>         of vast majority of our constituents.  The correct route
     in my
     >>      not so
     >>         humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out
     of the
     >>      way,
     >>         move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC
     didn't.
     >>         John Phillips
     >>         Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
     >>         Cell [2]217-412-5973
     >>         ------ Original message------
     >>         From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
     >>         Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
     >>         To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
     >>         Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[3];[5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
     >>         Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
     >>      They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority
     for
     >>      them.
     >>      ---
     >>      Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>      On [4]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
     >>      > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
     >>      >
     >>      > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn  wrote:
     >>      >
     >>      >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
     >>      >>
     >>      >> ---
     >>      >> Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>      >>
     >>      >> On [5]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
     >> wrote:
     >>      >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it
     is
     >> up
     >>      to the
     >>      >>> membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
     submit we
     >>      simply
     >>      >>> go
     >>      >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
     >>      >>> -Caryn Ann
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
     >>      Lnc-business
     >>      >>> <[1[6]][6][7]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
     If
     >>      >>> not,
     >>      >>> could
     >>      >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that
     discussion
     >> and
     >>      >>> simply
     >>      >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of
     discussion? I
     >>      >>> want
     >>      >>> to
     >>      >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
     forward. I
     >>      >>> abstained
     >>      >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
     >>      >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state
     chairs
     >> put
     >>      >>> very
     >>      >>> simply:
     >>      >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be
     detrimental and
     >>      >>> don't
     >>      >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
     is
     >>      >>> going
     >>      >>> to be
     >>      >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
     the
     >>      >>> first
     >>      >>> true
     >>      >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
     >>      >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
     >>      >>> Richard
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> Richard Longstreth
     >>      >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
     UT,
     >>      >>> WA,
     >>      >>> WY)
     >>      >>> Libertarian National Committee
     >>      >>> [1][2[7]][7][8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> [8]931.538.9300
     >>      >>> References
     >>      >>> 1. mailto:[3[9]][8][9]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> In Liberty,
     >>      >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>      >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     >> Secretary
     >>      >>> - [4][10]Caryn.Ann.[11] Harlos at LP.org or[12]
     >> Secretary at LP.org.
     >>      >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[13]
     >> LPedia at LP.org
     >>      >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>      >>> We defend your rights
     >>      >>> And oppose the use of force
     >>      >>> Taxation is theft
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> References
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> 1. mailto[14]:[9][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>      >>> 2. mailto[15]:[10][11]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> 3. mailto[16]:[11][12]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> 4. mailto[17]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>      > --
     >>      >
     >>      > --
     >>      >
     >>      > IN LIBERTY,
     >>      > CARYN ANN HARLOS
     >>      > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
     >> -
     >>      [18]Caryn.Ann
     >>      .[19] Harlos at LP.org or[20] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>      > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[21]
     LPedia at LP.org
     >>      >
     >>      > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>      > _We defend your rights_
     >>      > _And oppose the use of force_
     >>      > _Taxation is theft_
     >>         They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no
     authority
     >> for
     >>      them.
     >>         ---
     >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         On [22]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
     >>         There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
     >>         On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         <[1[23]][12][13]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
     >>           There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
     >>           ---
     >>           Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>           On [24]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via
     Lnc-business
     >>      wrote:
     >>           > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve -
     it
     >> is
     >>      up to
     >>           the
     >>           >    membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
     >> submit
     >>      we
     >>           simply
     >>           > go
     >>           >    on about our jobs and stay out of it.
     >>           >    -Caryn Ann
     >>           >
     >>           >    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard
     Longstreth via
     >>           Lnc-business
     >>           >    <[1][2[25]][13][14]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>           >
     >>           >         I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item
     in
     >>      Phoenix.
     >>           If
     >>           > not,
     >>           >      could
     >>           >         we please add it? If not, are we done with
     that
     >>      discussion
     >>           and
     >>           >      simply
     >>           >         not having a JC or what are the next points
     of
     >>      discussion?
     >>           I
     >>           > want
     >>           >      to
     >>           >         fully resolve this issue the best we can and
     move
     >>      forward.
     >>           I
     >>           >      abstained
     >>           >         last vote to approve but my mind is still not
     >>      settled.
     >>           >         There is no good solution here, but one of
     may
     >> state
     >>           chairs put
     >>           >      very
     >>           >         simply:
     >>           >         "I find this whole debacle with process to be
     >>      detrimental
     >>           and
     >>           >      don't
     >>           >         really care one way or the other how it pans
     out.
     >>      Nobody
     >>           is
     >>           > going
     >>           >      to be
     >>           >         100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock
     on
     >> some
     >>      of
     >>           the
     >>           > first
     >>           >      true
     >>           >         membership affecting votes from the LNC."
     >>           >         We need to resolve and move forward.
     >>           >         Richard
     >>           >         --
     >>           >         Richard Longstreth
     >>           >         Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT,
     NM,
     >> OR,
     >>      HI,
     >>           UT,
     >>           > WA,
     >>           >      WY)
     >>           >         Libertarian National Committee
     >>           >
     [1][2][3[26]][14][15]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >         [27]931.538.9300
     >>           >      References
     >>           >         1.
     mailto:[3][4[28]][15][16]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >
     >>           >    --
     >>           >    --
     >>           >    In Liberty,
     >>           >    Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>           >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
     Committee
     >>      Secretary
     >>           >    - [4][29]Caryn.Ann.[30] Harlos at LP.org or[31]
     >>      Secretary at LP.org.
     >>           >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[32]
     >>      LPedia at LP.org
     >>           >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>           >    We defend your rights
     >>           >    And oppose the use of force
     >>           >    Taxation is theft
     >>           >
     >>           > References
     >>           >
     >>           >    1. mailto:[5[33]][16][17]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>           >    2. mailto:[6[34]][17][18]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >    3. mailto:[7[35]][18][19]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >    4. mailto:[8[36]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>           --
     >>         --
     >>         In Liberty,
     >>         Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
     >>         - [9][37]Caryn.Ann.[38] Harlos at LP.org or[39]
     Secretary at LP.org.
     >>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[40]
     >> LPedia at LP.org
     >>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>         We defend your rights
     >>         And oppose the use of force
     >>         Taxation is theft
     >>      References
     >>         1. mailto[41]:[19][20]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>         2. mailto[42]:[20][21]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         3. mailto[43]:[21][22]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         4. mailto[44]:[22][23]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         5. mailto[45]:[23][24]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         6. mailto[46]:[24][25]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         7. mailto[47]:[25][26]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         8. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>         9. mailto[49]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>      References
     >>         1. [26][27]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>         2. tel:[27]217-412-5973
     >>         3. mailto:;[28][28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         4. tel:2018-07-20 11
     >>         5. tel:2018-07-20 08
     >>         6. mailto:][29][29]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         7. mailto:][30][30]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         8. tel:[31]931.538.9300
     >>         9. mailto:][32][31]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        10. [33][32]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        11. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
     >>        12. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        13. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
     >>        14. mailto::[34][33]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        15. mailto::[35][34]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        16. mailto::[36][35]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        17. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        18. [37][36]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        19. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
     >>        20. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        21. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
     >>        22. tel:2018-07-20 11
     >>        23. mailto:][38][37]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>        24. tel:2018-07-20 08
     >>        25. mailto:][39][38]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        26. mailto:][40][39]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        27. tel:[41]931.538.9300
     >>        28. mailto:][42][40]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        29. [43][41]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        30. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
     >>        31. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        32. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
     >>        33. mailto:][44][42]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        34. mailto:][45][43]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        35. mailto:][46][44]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        36. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        37. [47][45]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        38. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
     >>        39. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        40. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
     >>        41. mailto::[48][46]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>        42. mailto::[49][47]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        43. mailto::[50][48]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        44. mailto::[51][49]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        45. mailto::[52][50]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        46. mailto::[53][51]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        47. mailto::[54][52]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        49. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>
     >>      --
     >>
     >>    Richard Longstreth
     >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
     WA,
     >> WY)
     >>    Libertarian National Committee
     >>    [55][53]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    931.538.9300
     >>
     >>    --
     >>
     >>    Richard Longstreth
     >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
     WA,
     >> WY)
     >>    Libertarian National Committee
     >>    [56][54]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    931.538.9300
     >>
     >> References
     >>
     >>    1. mailto:[55]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>    2. mailto:[56]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    3. [57]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>    4. mailto:[58]john.phillips at lp.org
     >>    5. mailto:[59]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    6. mailto:[60]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    7. mailto:[61]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    8. mailto:[62]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    9. mailto:[63]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   10. mailto:[64]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   11. mailto:[65]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   12. mailto:[66]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   13. mailto:[67]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   14. mailto:[68]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   15. mailto:[69]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   16. mailto:[70]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   17. mailto:[71]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   18. mailto:[72]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   19. mailto:[73]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   20. mailto:[74]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   21. mailto:[75]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   22. mailto:[76]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   23. mailto:[77]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   24. mailto:[78]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   25. mailto:[79]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   26. [80]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>   27. tel:(217) 412-5973
     >>   28. mailto:[81]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   29. mailto:[82]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   30. mailto:[83]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   31. tel:(931) 538-9300
     >>   32. mailto:[84]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   33. [85]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   34. mailto:[86]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   35. mailto:[87]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   36. mailto:[88]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   37. [89]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   38. mailto:[90]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   39. mailto:[91]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   40. mailto:[92]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   41. tel:(931) 538-9300
     >>   42. mailto:[93]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   43. [94]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   44. mailto:[95]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   45. mailto:[96]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   46. mailto:[97]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   47. [98]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   48. mailto:[99]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   49. mailto:[100]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   50. mailto:[101]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   51. mailto:[102]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   52. mailto:[103]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   53. mailto:[104]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   54. mailto:[105]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   55. mailto:[106]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   56. mailto:[107]richard.longstreth at lp.org

   --

   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [108]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
   3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
   5. mailto:john.phillips at lp.org
   6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   7. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
   9. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  11. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  12. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  13. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  14. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  15. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  16. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  17. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  18. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  19. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  20. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  21. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  22. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  23. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  24. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  25. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  26. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  27. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  29. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  30. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  31. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  32. http://Caryn.An/
  33. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  34. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  35. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  36. http://Caryn.An/
  37. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  38. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  39. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  40. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  41. http://Caryn.An/
  42. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  43. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  44. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  45. http://Caryn.An/
  46. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  47. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  48. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  49. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  50. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  51. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  52. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  53. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  54. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  55. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  56. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  57. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  58. mailto:john.phillips at lp.org
  59. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  60. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  61. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  62. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  63. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  64. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  65. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  66. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  67. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  68. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  69. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  70. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  71. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  72. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  73. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  74. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  75. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  76. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  77. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  78. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  79. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  80. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  81. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  82. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  83. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  84. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  85. http://Caryn.An/
  86. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  87. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  88. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  89. http://Caryn.An/
  90. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  91. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  92. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  93. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  94. http://Caryn.An/
  95. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  96. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  97. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  98. http://Caryn.An/
  99. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 100. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 101. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 102. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 103. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 104. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 105. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 106. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 107. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 108. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
-------------- next part --------------
   Agreed
   John Phillips
   Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
   Cell [1]217-412-5973

   ------ Original message------
   From: Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
   Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2018 11:34 AM
   To: [2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
   Cc: Caryn Ann Harlos;
   Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
The right to elect a JC was not knowingly waived.  The Party exists to give
voice to and implement the Statement of Principles.  The JC insures that.

Having no JC is absolutely against the REST of the Bylaws.

And I sure hope we never have to disaffiliate a state party in the coming
two years as they have NO APPEAL.

Want to see the Party implode?  That is how you see the Party implode.

-Caryn Ann


On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:20 AM Craig Bowden via Lnc-business <[3]
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> We have been going over this, in circles, for two weeks. The facts are
> the there were several balls dropped and we have no authority to do
> anything, including a re-ballot.
>
> Article 8(1): "The Judicial Committee shall be composed of seven Party
> members elected at each Regular
> Convention..." While I understand this has been changed to reflect
> non-Presidential years, the reality is that we do not have the authority
> to send out a ballot outside of a Regular convention under our bylaws.
>
> We are going to have to deal with this at a Regular Convention. That is
> the reality. That is the hard bullet that we all must bite for our parts
> in the failure. Whether we didn't raise objections, didn't stay on the
> floor, or moved to adjourn before addressing.
>
> This is what we must accept. There is no JC.
>
> Craig Bowden
> Region 1 Alternate
>
>
>
> On [4]2018-07-21 10:00, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> > Actually, I think rejection of the one which "exists" is recognition
> > that one was not elected and you can't just dictatorially say that
> > because you were in the top seven in the voting at the convention you
> > are now the JC.  It is a violation of the Bylaws.  I challenge their
> > legitimacy.  Same argument against us acknowledging them is in place
> > here - there was no proper election of them at convention.
> >
> > -Brent
> >
> > On [5]2018-07-20 21:47, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business wrote:
> >> I dont understand. Is your Region refusing to acknowledge that there
> >> is
> >>    a JC? Is it passive denial or a rejection of the one that exists?
> >> The
> >>    distinction is quite important because one does exist and a
> >> rejection
> >>    is, in essence, a rejection of a part of the national party.
> >>
> >>    Richard
> >>
> >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 21:11 Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>    <[1[6]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>    I'd replied to John Phillips, he's the Region 6 rep.
> >>    Also, I've already stated my position.  I'd wanted to have the LNC
> >>    approve the top seven, I co-sponsored that motion.  Only, when took
> >> the
> >>    discussion to my region, multiple members, including officers,
> >> state
> >>    chairs, VCs, etc, of Region 3 were adamant that under our bylaws
> >>    there's no JC, and no way to get one.  Me stating this on the LNC
> >> email
> >>    list is just that, me stating what my region has said, and wants.
> >>    I've no idea why you're making comments about "do not turn this
> >>    personal"??  I've said nothing personal. Don't project onto me.
> >>    What I have done is point out that another regional rep isn't
> >> speaking
> >>    for my region.
> >>    As for my reply to the LNC Secretary, the same.  An officer has a
> >>    particular role, otherwise, they have one vote, same as anyone on
> >> the
> >>    LNC.  The LNC secretary asked people to confer with the registered
> >>    parliamentarian, and I have, and I've also read his views on this
> >>    subject.  I went through the bylaws carefully, and got feedback
> >> from an
> >>    officer in my own state affiliate, officers from the other state
> >>    affiliates in my region, etc.  My statements are the result of
> >>    listening to the members in my region.  I've done due diligence on
> >> this
> >>    issue. I've not going to take the time to listen to my region, and
> >> then
> >>    ignore them.
> >>    My representation and advocacy is for my region.
> >>    ---
> >>    Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>
> >>    On [7]2018-07-20 18:10, Richard Longstreth wrote:
> >>
> >>    My Region says that the Top 7 should be and we should move on. We
> >>    cannot simply "You do your region, and I'll do mine."
> >>    First off, the person you said that to is an Officer. Therefore,
> >> her
> >>    Region in is the entirety of membership and she IS expressing her
> >>    thoughts from her 'region'. Your words give off the air of
> >> flippancy
> >>    and are borderline offensive to me as one whom the comments were
> >> not
> >>    directed toward. This is not how we should be interacting as
> >> officers
> >>    and certainly not a way to advance the Party. We need to work
> >> together,
> >>    not have an attitude of every region for themselves.
> >>
> >>    Secondly, there is a difference between our Regions, EVH. Mine says
> >>    that the Top 7 are the JC yours says that we don't have a JC. Both
> >>    situations cannot exist simultaneously and this NEEDS to be
> >> resolved
> >>    and finalized for all members. I cannot tell my states that a JC
> >> exists
> >>    for Region 1 but not for Region 3; that is absurd.
> >>
> >>    Finally, I have dropped this discussion if we acknowledge that the
> >> JC
> >>    exists and is the Top 7 - something I abstained from orginally, but
> >> see
> >>    as the only logical solution going forward. If not, we need to
> >> discuss
> >>    this further which is the will of neither of our regions or that of
> >> the
> >>    general membership. Most want to move on from the issue. The LNC as
> >> a
> >>    body did not approve the Top 7. The former JC came up with a
> >> solution
> >>    and that is to put the Top 7 in place. If we, as an LNC or Regional
> >>    Representative do not acknowledge that solution we are creating a
> >> deep
> >>    divide in the Party.
> >>
> >>    Thoughts? Please do not turn this personal. I want to work with you
> >> to
> >>    find a resolution that suits all parties involved.
> >>
> >>    Richard
> >>
> >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM Elizabeth Van Horn via
> >> Lnc-business
> >>    <[2[8]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>         I was in favor of the LNC approving the top seven JC
> >> candidates.
> >>      But,
> >>         my region isn't, and leadership has let me know that they
> >> think
> >>      there's
> >>         no JC.
> >>         I'm not sure what you're going on about. I'm not arguing. Nor,
> >> am
> >>      I
> >>         doing anything, other than stating what my region thinks.
> >>         You do your region, and I'll do mine.
> >>         ---
> >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> >>         Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> >>         LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> >>         Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> >>         [1][3][9]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>         On [10]2018-07-20 13:26, [4[11]]john.phillips at lp.org wrote:
> >>         Shrug.  If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would have
> >> a
> >>      50/50
> >>         shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at it.
> >> Some
> >>      of
> >>         them thought they could win maybe 70%.
> >>         So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as good
> >> as
> >>      the
> >>         argument against.
> >>         However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I see,
> >> so
> >>      I fail
> >>         to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just accept
> >> it
> >>      and
> >>         move on, it is what we should have done from the beginning.
> >>         On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians?  I find the
> >>      arguments of
> >>         rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic.  We argue all the
> >> time
> >>      about
> >>         changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem, but
> >> when
> >>      it
> >>         comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort of
> >>         hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
> >>         So my stance is this.  I stand opposed to anything that
> >> continues
> >>      to
> >>         drag this out.  I stand opposed to anything other than
> >> accepting
> >>      the
> >>         recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me to be
> >>      the will
> >>         of vast majority of our constituents.  The correct route in my
> >>      not so
> >>         humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out of the
> >>      way,
> >>         move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC didn't.
> >>         John Phillips
> >>         Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> >>         Cell [2][12]217-412-5973
> >>         ------ Original message------
> >>         From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> >>         Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
> >>         To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
> >>         Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[3];[5[13]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> >>         Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
> >>      They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority for
> >>      them.
> >>      ---
> >>      Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>      On [4][14]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> >>      > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >>      >
> >>      > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn  wrote:
> >>      >
> >>      >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>      >>
> >>      >> ---
> >>      >> Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>      >>
> >>      >> On [5][15]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> >> wrote:
> >>      >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it is
> >> up
> >>      to the
> >>      >>> membership to complain about that if they wish.  I submit we
> >>      simply
> >>      >>> go
> >>      >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>      >>> -Caryn Ann
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> >>      Lnc-business
> >>      >>> <[1[6]][6[16]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
> >>      >>> not,
> >>      >>> could
> >>      >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion
> >> and
> >>      >>> simply
> >>      >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion? I
> >>      >>> want
> >>      >>> to
> >>      >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward. I
> >>      >>> abstained
> >>      >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> >>      >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs
> >> put
> >>      >>> very
> >>      >>> simply:
> >>      >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental and
> >>      >>> don't
> >>      >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
> >>      >>> going
> >>      >>> to be
> >>      >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
> >>      >>> first
> >>      >>> true
> >>      >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>      >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>      >>> Richard
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> Richard Longstreth
> >>      >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
> >>      >>> WA,
> >>      >>> WY)
> >>      >>> Libertarian National Committee
> >>      >>> [1][2[7]][7[17]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> [8][18]931.538.9300
> >>      >>> References
> >>      >>> 1. mailto:[3[9]][8[19]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> --
> >>      >>> In Liberty,
> >>      >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>      >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> >> Secretary
> >>      >>> - [4][10][20]Caryn.Ann.[11][21] Harlos at LP.org or[12]
> >>[22] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>      >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[13]
> >>[23] LPedia at LP.org
> >>      >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>      >>> We defend your rights
> >>      >>> And oppose the use of force
> >>      >>> Taxation is theft
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> References
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> 1. mailto[14]:[9[24]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>      >>> 2. mailto[15]:[10[25]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> 3. mailto[16]:[11[26]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>      >>> 4. mailto[17][27]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>      > --
> >>      >
> >>      > --
> >>      >
> >>      > IN LIBERTY,
> >>      > CARYN ANN HARLOS
> >>      > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >> -
> >>      [18][28]Caryn.Ann
> >>      .[19][29] Harlos at LP.org or[20][30] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>      > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[21][31] LPedia at LP.org
> >>      >
> >>      > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>      > _We defend your rights_
> >>      > _And oppose the use of force_
> >>      > _Taxation is theft_
> >>         They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority
> >> for
> >>      them.
> >>         ---
> >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         On [22][32]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> >>         There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >>         On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>         <[1[23]][12[33]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> >>           There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>           ---
> >>           Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>           On [24][34]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> >>      wrote:
> >>           > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it
> >> is
> >>      up to
> >>           the
> >>           >    membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
> >> submit
> >>      we
> >>           simply
> >>           > go
> >>           >    on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>           >    -Caryn Ann
> >>           >
> >>           >    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> >>           Lnc-business
> >>           >    <[1][2[25]][13[35]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>           >
> >>           >         I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in
> >>      Phoenix.
> >>           If
> >>           > not,
> >>           >      could
> >>           >         we please add it? If not, are we done with that
> >>      discussion
> >>           and
> >>           >      simply
> >>           >         not having a JC or what are the next points of
> >>      discussion?
> >>           I
> >>           > want
> >>           >      to
> >>           >         fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
> >>      forward.
> >>           I
> >>           >      abstained
> >>           >         last vote to approve but my mind is still not
> >>      settled.
> >>           >         There is no good solution here, but one of may
> >> state
> >>           chairs put
> >>           >      very
> >>           >         simply:
> >>           >         "I find this whole debacle with process to be
> >>      detrimental
> >>           and
> >>           >      don't
> >>           >         really care one way or the other how it pans out.
> >>      Nobody
> >>           is
> >>           > going
> >>           >      to be
> >>           >         100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on
> >> some
> >>      of
> >>           the
> >>           > first
> >>           >      true
> >>           >         membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>           >         We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>           >         Richard
> >>           >         --
> >>           >         Richard Longstreth
> >>           >         Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM,
> >> OR,
> >>      HI,
> >>           UT,
> >>           > WA,
> >>           >      WY)
> >>           >         Libertarian National Committee
> >>           >         [1][2][3[26]][14[36]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >         [27][37]931.538.9300
> >>           >      References
> >>           >         1. mailto:[3][4[28]][15[38]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >
> >>           >    --
> >>           >    --
> >>           >    In Liberty,
> >>           >    Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>           >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
> >>      Secretary
> >>           >    - [4][29][39]Caryn.Ann.[30][40] Harlos at LP.org or[31]
> >>     [41] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>           >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[32]
> >>     [42] LPedia at LP.org
> >>           >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>           >    We defend your rights
> >>           >    And oppose the use of force
> >>           >    Taxation is theft
> >>           >
> >>           > References
> >>           >
> >>           >    1. mailto:[5[33]][16[43]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>           >    2. mailto:[6[34]][17[44]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >    3. mailto:[7[35]][18[45]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>           >    4. mailto:[8[36][46]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>           --
> >>         --
> >>         In Liberty,
> >>         Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> >>         - [9][37][47]Caryn.Ann.[38][48] Harlos at LP.org or[39][49] Secretary@
LP.org.
> >>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[40]
> >>[50] LPedia at LP.org
> >>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>         We defend your rights
> >>         And oppose the use of force
> >>         Taxation is theft
> >>      References
> >>         1. mailto[41]:[19[51]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>         2. mailto[42]:[20[52]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         3. mailto[43]:[21[53]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         4. mailto[44]:[22[54]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         5. mailto[45]:[23[55]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         6. mailto[46]:[24[56]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         7. mailto[47]:[25[57]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         8. mailto[48][58]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>         9. mailto[49][59]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>      References
> >>         1. [26][60]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>         2. tel:[27][61]217-412-5973
> >>         3. mailto:;[28[62]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         4. tel:[63]2018-07-20 11
> >>         5. tel:[64]2018-07-20 08
> >>         6. mailto:][29[65]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>         7. mailto:][30[66]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>         8. tel:[31][67]931.538.9300
> >>         9. mailto:][32[68]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        10. [33][69]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        11. mailto:[70] Harlos at LP.org
> >>        12. mailto:[71] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        13. mailto:[72] LPedia at LP.org
> >>        14. mailto::[34[73]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        15. mailto::[35[74]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        16. mailto::[36[75]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        17. mailto:[76]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        18. [37][77]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        19. mailto:[78] Harlos at LP.org
> >>        20. mailto:[79] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        21. mailto:[80] LPedia at LP.org
> >>        22. tel:[81]2018-07-20 11
> >>        23. mailto:][38[82]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>        24. tel:[83]2018-07-20 08
> >>        25. mailto:][39[84]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        26. mailto:][40[85]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        27. tel:[41][86]931.538.9300
> >>        28. mailto:][42[87]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        29. [43][88]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        30. mailto:[89] Harlos at LP.org
> >>        31. mailto:[90] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        32. mailto:[91] LPedia at LP.org
> >>        33. mailto:][44[92]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        34. mailto:][45[93]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        35. mailto:][46[94]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        36. mailto:[95]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        37. [47][96]http://Caryn.An/
> >>        38. mailto:[97] Harlos at LP.org
> >>        39. mailto:[98] Secretary at LP.org.
> >>        40. mailto:[99] LPedia at LP.org
> >>        41. mailto::[48[100]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>        42. mailto::[49[101]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        43. mailto::[50[102]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        44. mailto::[51[103]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        45. mailto::[52[104]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>        46. mailto::[53[105]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        47. mailto::[54[106]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>        48. mailto:[107]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>        49. mailto:[108]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >>
> >>      --
> >>
> >>    Richard Longstreth
> >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
> >> WY)
> >>    Libertarian National Committee
> >>    [55[109]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    [110]931.538.9300
> >>
> >>    --
> >>
> >>    Richard Longstreth
> >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA,
> >> WY)
> >>    Libertarian National Committee
> >>    [56[111]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    [112]931.538.9300
> >>
> >> References
> >>
> >>    1. mailto[113]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>    2. mailto[114]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    3. [115]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>    4. mailto[116]:john.phillips at lp.org
> >>    5. mailto[117]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    6. mailto[118]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>    7. mailto[119]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    8. mailto[120]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>    9. mailto[121]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   10. mailto[122]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   11. mailto[123]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   12. mailto[124]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   13. mailto[125]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   14. mailto[126]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   15. mailto[127]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   16. mailto[128]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   17. mailto[129]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   18. mailto[130]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   19. mailto[131]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   20. mailto[132]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   21. mailto[133]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   22. mailto[134]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   23. mailto[135]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   24. mailto[136]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   25. mailto[137]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   26. [138]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >>   27. tel:[139](217) 412-5973
> >>   28. mailto[140]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   29. mailto[141]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   30. mailto[142]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   31. tel:[143](931) 538-9300
> >>   32. mailto[144]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   33. [145]http://Caryn.An/
> >>   34. mailto[146]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   35. mailto[147]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   36. mailto[148]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   37. [149]http://Caryn.An/
> >>   38. mailto[150]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   39. mailto[151]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   40. mailto[152]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   41. tel:[153](931) 538-9300
> >>   42. mailto[154]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   43. [155]http://Caryn.An/
> >>   44. mailto[156]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   45. mailto[157]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   46. mailto[158]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   47. [159]http://Caryn.An/
> >>   48. mailto[160]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> >>   49. mailto[161]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   50. mailto[162]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   51. mailto[163]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   52. mailto[164]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>   53. mailto[165]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   54. mailto[166]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   55. mailto[167]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>   56. mailto[168]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - [169]Caryn.Ann.
[170]
Harlos at LP.org  or[171] Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[172] LPedia at LP.org

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*

   The right to elect a JC was not knowingly waived.  The Party exists to
   give voice to and implement the Statement of Principles.  The JC
   insures that.

   Having no JC is absolutely against the REST of the Bylaws.

   And I sure hope we never have to disaffiliate a state party in the
   coming two years as they have NO APPEAL.

   Want to see the Party implode?  That is how you see the Party implode.

   -Caryn Ann

   On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:20 AM Craig Bowden via Lnc-business
   <[1[173]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

     We have been going over this, in circles, for two weeks. The facts
     are
     the there were several balls dropped and we have no authority to do
     anything, including a re-ballot.
     Article 8(1): "The Judicial Committee shall be composed of seven
     Party
     members elected at each Regular
     Convention..." While I understand this has been changed to reflect
     non-Presidential years, the reality is that we do not have the
     authority
     to send out a ballot outside of a Regular convention under our
     bylaws.
     We are going to have to deal with this at a Regular Convention. That
     is
     the reality. That is the hard bullet that we all must bite for our
     parts
     in the failure. Whether we didn't raise objections, didn't stay on
     the
     floor, or moved to adjourn before addressing.
     This is what we must accept. There is no JC.
     Craig Bowden
     Region 1 Alternate
     On [174]2018-07-21 10:00, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business wrote:
     > Actually, I think rejection of the one which "exists" is
     recognition
     > that one was not elected and you can't just dictatorially say that
     > because you were in the top seven in the voting at the convention
     you
     > are now the JC.  It is a violation of the Bylaws.  I challenge
     their
     > legitimacy.  Same argument against us acknowledging them is in
     place
     > here - there was no proper election of them at convention.
     >
     > -Brent
     >
     > On [175]2018-07-20 21:47, Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business wrote:
     >> I dont understand. Is your Region refusing to acknowledge that
     there
     >> is
     >>    a JC? Is it passive denial or a rejection of the one that
     exists?
     >> The
     >>    distinction is quite important because one does exist and a
     >> rejection
     >>    is, in essence, a rejection of a part of the national party.
     >>
     >>    Richard
     >>
     >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 21:11 Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>    <[1][2[176]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
     >>
     >>    I'd replied to John Phillips, he's the Region 6 rep.
     >>    Also, I've already stated my position.  I'd wanted to have the
     LNC
     >>    approve the top seven, I co-sponsored that motion.  Only, when
     took
     >> the
     >>    discussion to my region, multiple members, including officers,
     >> state
     >>    chairs, VCs, etc, of Region 3 were adamant that under our
     bylaws
     >>    there's no JC, and no way to get one.  Me stating this on the
     LNC
     >> email
     >>    list is just that, me stating what my region has said, and
     wants.
     >>    I've no idea why you're making comments about "do not turn
     this
     >>    personal"??  I've said nothing personal. Don't project onto
     me.
     >>    What I have done is point out that another regional rep isn't
     >> speaking
     >>    for my region.
     >>    As for my reply to the LNC Secretary, the same.  An officer
     has a
     >>    particular role, otherwise, they have one vote, same as anyone
     on
     >> the
     >>    LNC.  The LNC secretary asked people to confer with the
     registered
     >>    parliamentarian, and I have, and I've also read his views on
     this
     >>    subject.  I went through the bylaws carefully, and got
     feedback
     >> from an
     >>    officer in my own state affiliate, officers from the other
     state
     >>    affiliates in my region, etc.  My statements are the result of
     >>    listening to the members in my region.  I've done due
     diligence on
     >> this
     >>    issue. I've not going to take the time to listen to my region,
     and
     >> then
     >>    ignore them.
     >>    My representation and advocacy is for my region.
     >>    ---
     >>    Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>
     >>    On [177]2018-07-20 18:10, Richard Longstreth wrote:
     >>
     >>    My Region says that the Top 7 should be and we should move on.
     We
     >>    cannot simply "You do your region, and I'll do mine."
     >>    First off, the person you said that to is an Officer.
     Therefore,
     >> her
     >>    Region in is the entirety of membership and she IS expressing
     her
     >>    thoughts from her 'region'. Your words give off the air of
     >> flippancy
     >>    and are borderline offensive to me as one whom the comments
     were
     >> not
     >>    directed toward. This is not how we should be interacting as
     >> officers
     >>    and certainly not a way to advance the Party. We need to work
     >> together,
     >>    not have an attitude of every region for themselves.
     >>
     >>    Secondly, there is a difference between our Regions, EVH. Mine
     says
     >>    that the Top 7 are the JC yours says that we don't have a JC.
     Both
     >>    situations cannot exist simultaneously and this NEEDS to be
     >> resolved
     >>    and finalized for all members. I cannot tell my states that a
     JC
     >> exists
     >>    for Region 1 but not for Region 3; that is absurd.
     >>
     >>    Finally, I have dropped this discussion if we acknowledge that
     the
     >> JC
     >>    exists and is the Top 7 - something I abstained from
     orginally, but
     >> see
     >>    as the only logical solution going forward. If not, we need to
     >> discuss
     >>    this further which is the will of neither of our regions or
     that of
     >> the
     >>    general membership. Most want to move on from the issue. The
     LNC as
     >> a
     >>    body did not approve the Top 7. The former JC came up with a
     >> solution
     >>    and that is to put the Top 7 in place. If we, as an LNC or
     Regional
     >>    Representative do not acknowledge that solution we are
     creating a
     >> deep
     >>    divide in the Party.
     >>
     >>    Thoughts? Please do not turn this personal. I want to work
     with you
     >> to
     >>    find a resolution that suits all parties involved.
     >>
     >>    Richard
     >>
     >>    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM Elizabeth Van Horn via
     >> Lnc-business
     >>    <[2][3[178]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>
     >>         I was in favor of the LNC approving the top seven JC
     >> candidates.
     >>      But,
     >>         my region isn't, and leadership has let me know that they
     >> think
     >>      there's
     >>         no JC.
     >>         I'm not sure what you're going on about. I'm not arguing.
     Nor,
     >> am
     >>      I
     >>         doing anything, other than stating what my region thinks.
     >>         You do your region, and I'll do mine.
     >>         ---
     >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
     >>         Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
     >>         LP Social Media Process Review Committee
     >>         Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
     >>         [1][3][4][179]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>         On [180]2018-07-20 13:26, [4][5[181]]john.phillips at lp.org wrote:
     >>         Shrug.  If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would
     have
     >> a
     >>      50/50
     >>         shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at
     it.
     >> Some
     >>      of
     >>         them thought they could win maybe 70%.
     >>         So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as
     good
     >> as
     >>      the
     >>         argument against.
     >>         However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I
     see,
     >> so
     >>      I fail
     >>         to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just
     accept
     >> it
     >>      and
     >>         move on, it is what we should have done from the
     beginning.
     >>         On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians?  I find the
     >>      arguments of
     >>         rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic.  We argue all
     the
     >> time
     >>      about
     >>         changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem,
     but
     >> when
     >>      it
     >>         comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems
     sort of
     >>         hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
     >>         So my stance is this.  I stand opposed to anything that
     >> continues
     >>      to
     >>         drag this out.  I stand opposed to anything other than
     >> accepting
     >>      the
     >>         recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me
     to be
     >>      the will
     >>         of vast majority of our constituents.  The correct route
     in my
     >>      not so
     >>         humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out
     of the
     >>      way,
     >>         move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC
     didn't.
     >>         John Phillips
     >>         Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
     >>         Cell [2][182]217-412-5973
     >>         ------ Original message------
     >>         From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
     >>         Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
     >>         To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
     >>         Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[3];[5][6[183]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
     >>         Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
     >>      They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no authority
     for
     >>      them.
     >>      ---
     >>      Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>      On [4][184]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
     >>      > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
     >>      >
     >>      > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn  wrote:
     >>      >
     >>      >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
     >>      >>
     >>      >> ---
     >>      >> Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>      >>
     >>      >> On [5][185]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
     >> wrote:
     >>      >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it
     is
     >> up
     >>      to the
     >>      >>> membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
     submit we
     >>      simply
     >>      >>> go
     >>      >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
     >>      >>> -Caryn Ann
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
     >>      Lnc-business
     >>      >>> <[1[6]][6][7[186]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
     If
     >>      >>> not,
     >>      >>> could
     >>      >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that
     discussion
     >> and
     >>      >>> simply
     >>      >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of
     discussion? I
     >>      >>> want
     >>      >>> to
     >>      >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
     forward. I
     >>      >>> abstained
     >>      >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
     >>      >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state
     chairs
     >> put
     >>      >>> very
     >>      >>> simply:
     >>      >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be
     detrimental and
     >>      >>> don't
     >>      >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
     is
     >>      >>> going
     >>      >>> to be
     >>      >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
     the
     >>      >>> first
     >>      >>> true
     >>      >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
     >>      >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
     >>      >>> Richard
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> Richard Longstreth
     >>      >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
     UT,
     >>      >>> WA,
     >>      >>> WY)
     >>      >>> Libertarian National Committee
     >>      >>> [1][2[7]][7][8[187]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> [8][188]931.538.9300
     >>      >>> References
     >>      >>> 1. mailto:[3[9]][8][9[189]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> --
     >>      >>> In Liberty,
     >>      >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>      >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     >> Secretary
     >>      >>> - [4][10][190]Caryn.Ann.[11][191] Harlos at LP.org or[12]
     >>[192] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>      >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[13]
     >>[193] LPedia at LP.org
     >>      >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>      >>> We defend your rights
     >>      >>> And oppose the use of force
     >>      >>> Taxation is theft
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> References
     >>      >>>
     >>      >>> 1. mailto[14]:[9][10[194]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>      >>> 2. mailto[15]:[10][11[195]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> 3. mailto[16]:[11][12[196]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>      >>> 4. mailto[17][197]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>      > --
     >>      >
     >>      > --
     >>      >
     >>      > IN LIBERTY,
     >>      > CARYN ANN HARLOS
     >>      > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
     >> -
     >>      [18][198]Caryn.Ann
     >>      .[19][199] Harlos at LP.org or[20][200] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>      > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[21]
    [201] LPedia at LP.org
     >>      >
     >>      > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>      > _We defend your rights_
     >>      > _And oppose the use of force_
     >>      > _Taxation is theft_
     >>         They can disagree all they want.   But, there's no
     authority
     >> for
     >>      them.
     >>         ---
     >>         Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         On [22][202]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
     >>         There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
     >>         On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>         <[1[23]][12][13[203]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
     >>           There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
     >>           ---
     >>           Elizabeth Van Horn
     >>           On [24][204]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via
     Lnc-business
     >>      wrote:
     >>           > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve -
     it
     >> is
     >>      up to
     >>           the
     >>           >    membership to complain about that if they wish.  I
     >> submit
     >>      we
     >>           simply
     >>           > go
     >>           >    on about our jobs and stay out of it.
     >>           >    -Caryn Ann
     >>           >
     >>           >    On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard
     Longstreth via
     >>           Lnc-business
     >>           >    <[1][2[25]][13][14[205]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
     >>           >
     >>           >         I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item
     in
     >>      Phoenix.
     >>           If
     >>           > not,
     >>           >      could
     >>           >         we please add it? If not, are we done with
     that
     >>      discussion
     >>           and
     >>           >      simply
     >>           >         not having a JC or what are the next points
     of
     >>      discussion?
     >>           I
     >>           > want
     >>           >      to
     >>           >         fully resolve this issue the best we can and
     move
     >>      forward.
     >>           I
     >>           >      abstained
     >>           >         last vote to approve but my mind is still not
     >>      settled.
     >>           >         There is no good solution here, but one of
     may
     >> state
     >>           chairs put
     >>           >      very
     >>           >         simply:
     >>           >         "I find this whole debacle with process to be
     >>      detrimental
     >>           and
     >>           >      don't
     >>           >         really care one way or the other how it pans
     out.
     >>      Nobody
     >>           is
     >>           > going
     >>           >      to be
     >>           >         100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock
     on
     >> some
     >>      of
     >>           the
     >>           > first
     >>           >      true
     >>           >         membership affecting votes from the LNC."
     >>           >         We need to resolve and move forward.
     >>           >         Richard
     >>           >         --
     >>           >         Richard Longstreth
     >>           >         Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT,
     NM,
     >> OR,
     >>      HI,
     >>           UT,
     >>           > WA,
     >>           >      WY)
     >>           >         Libertarian National Committee
     >>           >
     [1][2][3[26]][14][15[206]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >         [27][207]931.538.9300
     >>           >      References
     >>           >         1.
     mailto:[3][4[28]][15][16[208]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >
     >>           >    --
     >>           >    --
     >>           >    In Liberty,
     >>           >    Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>           >    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
     Committee
     >>      Secretary
     >>           >    - [4][29][209]Caryn.Ann.[30][210] Harlos at LP.org or[31]
     >>     [211] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>           >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[32]
     >>     [212] LPedia at LP.org
     >>           >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>           >    We defend your rights
     >>           >    And oppose the use of force
     >>           >    Taxation is theft
     >>           >
     >>           > References
     >>           >
     >>           >    1. mailto:[5[33]][16][17[213]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>           >    2. mailto:[6[34]][17][18[214]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >    3. mailto:[7[35]][18][19[215]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>           >    4. mailto:[8[36][216]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>           --
     >>         --
     >>         In Liberty,
     >>         Caryn Ann Harlos
     >>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
     Secretary
     >>         - [9][37][217]Caryn.Ann.[38][218] Harlos at LP.org or[39]
    [219] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[40]
     >>[220] LPedia at LP.org
     >>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >>         We defend your rights
     >>         And oppose the use of force
     >>         Taxation is theft
     >>      References
     >>         1. mailto[41]:[19][20[221]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>         2. mailto[42]:[20][21[222]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         3. mailto[43]:[21][22[223]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         4. mailto[44]:[22][23[224]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         5. mailto[45]:[23][24[225]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         6. mailto[46]:[24][25[226]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         7. mailto[47]:[25][26[227]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         8. mailto[48][228]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>         9. mailto[49][229]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>      References
     >>         1. [26][27][230]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>         2. tel:[27][231]217-412-5973
     >>         3. mailto:;[28][28[232]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         4. tel:[233]2018-07-20 11
     >>         5. tel:[234]2018-07-20 08
     >>         6. mailto:][29][29[235]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>         7. mailto:][30][30[236]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>         8. tel:[31][237]931.538.9300
     >>         9. mailto:][32][31[238]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        10. [33][32][239]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        11. mailto:[240] Harlos at LP.org
     >>        12. mailto:[241] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        13. mailto:[242] LPedia at LP.org
     >>        14. mailto::[34][33[243]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        15. mailto::[35][34[244]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        16. mailto::[36][35[245]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        17. mailto:[246]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        18. [37][36][247]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        19. mailto:[248] Harlos at LP.org
     >>        20. mailto:[249] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        21. mailto:[250] LPedia at LP.org
     >>        22. tel:[251]2018-07-20 11
     >>        23. mailto:][38][37[252]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>        24. tel:[253]2018-07-20 08
     >>        25. mailto:][39][38[254]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        26. mailto:][40][39[255]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        27. tel:[41][256]931.538.9300
     >>        28. mailto:][42][40[257]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        29. [43][41][258]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        30. mailto:[259] Harlos at LP.org
     >>        31. mailto:[260] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        32. mailto:[261] LPedia at LP.org
     >>        33. mailto:][44][42[262]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        34. mailto:][45][43[263]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        35. mailto:][46][44[264]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        36. mailto:[265]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        37. [47][45][266]http://Caryn.An/
     >>        38. mailto:[267] Harlos at LP.org
     >>        39. mailto:[268] Secretary at LP.org.
     >>        40. mailto:[269] LPedia at LP.org
     >>        41. mailto::[48][46[270]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>        42. mailto::[49][47[271]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        43. mailto::[50][48[272]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        44. mailto::[51][49[273]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        45. mailto::[52][50[274]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>        46. mailto::[53][51[275]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        47. mailto::[54][52[276]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>        48. mailto:[277]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>        49. mailto:[278]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >>
     >>      --
     >>
     >>    Richard Longstreth
     >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
     WA,
     >> WY)
     >>    Libertarian National Committee
     >>    [55][53[279]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    [280]931.538.9300
     >>
     >>    --
     >>
     >>    Richard Longstreth
     >>    Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
     WA,
     >> WY)
     >>    Libertarian National Committee
     >>    [56][54[281]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    [282]931.538.9300
     >>
     >> References
     >>
     >>    1. mailto:[55[283]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>    2. mailto:[56[284]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    3. [57][285]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>    4. mailto:[58[286]]john.phillips at lp.org
     >>    5. mailto:[59[287]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    6. mailto:[60[288]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>    7. mailto:[61[289]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    8. mailto:[62[290]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>    9. mailto:[63[291]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   10. mailto:[64[292]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   11. mailto:[65[293]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   12. mailto:[66[294]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   13. mailto:[67[295]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   14. mailto:[68[296]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   15. mailto:[69[297]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   16. mailto:[70[298]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   17. mailto:[71[299]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   18. mailto:[72[300]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   19. mailto:[73[301]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   20. mailto:[74[302]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   21. mailto:[75[303]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   22. mailto:[76[304]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   23. mailto:[77[305]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   24. mailto:[78[306]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   25. mailto:[79[307]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   26. [80][308]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >>   27. tel:[309](217) 412-5973
     >>   28. mailto:[81[310]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   29. mailto:[82[311]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   30. mailto:[83[312]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   31. tel:[313](931) 538-9300
     >>   32. mailto:[84[314]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   33. [85][315]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   34. mailto:[86[316]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   35. mailto:[87[317]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   36. mailto:[88[318]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   37. [89][319]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   38. mailto:[90[320]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   39. mailto:[91[321]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   40. mailto:[92[322]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   41. tel:[323](931) 538-9300
     >>   42. mailto:[93[324]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   43. [94][325]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   44. mailto:[95[326]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   45. mailto:[96[327]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   46. mailto:[97[328]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   47. [98][329]http://Caryn.An/
     >>   48. mailto:[99[330]]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
     >>   49. mailto:[100[331]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   50. mailto:[101[332]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   51. mailto:[102[333]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   52. mailto:[103[334]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     >>   53. mailto:[104[335]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   54. mailto:[105[336]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   55. mailto:[106[337]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
     >>   56. mailto:[107[338]]richard.longstreth at lp.org

   --

   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
   - [108][339]Caryn.Ann.[340] Harlos at LP.org or[341] Secretary at LP.org.
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[342] LPedia at LP.org
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto[343]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. mailto[344]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
   3. mailto[345]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. [346]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
   5. mailto[347]:john.phillips at lp.org
   6. mailto[348]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   7. mailto[349]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   8. mailto[350]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
   9. mailto[351]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  10. mailto[352]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  11. mailto[353]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  12. mailto[354]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  13. mailto[355]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  14. mailto[356]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  15. mailto[357]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  16. mailto[358]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  17. mailto[359]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  18. mailto[360]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  19. mailto[361]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  20. mailto[362]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  21. mailto[363]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  22. mailto[364]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  23. mailto[365]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  24. mailto[366]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  25. mailto[367]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  26. mailto[368]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  27. [369]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  28. mailto[370]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  29. mailto[371]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  30. mailto[372]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  31. mailto[373]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  32. [374]http://Caryn.An/
  33. mailto[375]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  34. mailto[376]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  35. mailto[377]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  36. [378]http://Caryn.An/
  37. mailto[379]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  38. mailto[380]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  39. mailto[381]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  40. mailto[382]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  41. [383]http://Caryn.An/
  42. mailto[384]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  43. mailto[385]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  44. mailto[386]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  45. [387]http://Caryn.An/
  46. mailto[388]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  47. mailto[389]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  48. mailto[390]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  49. mailto[391]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  50. mailto[392]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  51. mailto[393]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  52. mailto[394]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  53. mailto[395]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  54. mailto[396]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  55. mailto[397]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  56. mailto[398]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  57. [399]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  58. mailto[400]:john.phillips at lp.org
  59. mailto[401]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  60. mailto[402]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  61. mailto[403]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  62. mailto[404]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  63. mailto[405]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  64. mailto[406]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  65. mailto[407]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  66. mailto[408]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  67. mailto[409]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  68. mailto[410]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  69. mailto[411]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  70. mailto[412]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  71. mailto[413]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  72. mailto[414]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  73. mailto[415]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  74. mailto[416]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  75. mailto[417]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  76. mailto[418]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  77. mailto[419]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  78. mailto[420]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  79. mailto[421]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  80. [422]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  81. mailto[423]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  82. mailto[424]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  83. mailto[425]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  84. mailto[426]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  85. [427]http://Caryn.An/
  86. mailto[428]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  87. mailto[429]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  88. mailto[430]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  89. [431]http://Caryn.An/
  90. mailto[432]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  91. mailto[433]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  92. mailto[434]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  93. mailto[435]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  94. [436]http://Caryn.An/
  95. mailto[437]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  96. mailto[438]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  97. mailto[439]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
  98. [440]http://Caryn.An/
  99. mailto[441]:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 100. mailto[442]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 101. mailto[443]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 102. mailto[444]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 103. mailto[445]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 104. mailto[446]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 105. mailto[447]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 106. mailto[448]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 107. mailto[449]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
 108. mailto[450]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org

References

   1. tel:217-412-5973
   2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   3. mailto:
lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   4. tel:2018-07-21 10
   5. tel:2018-07-20 21
   6. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
   7. tel:2018-07-20 18
   8. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   9. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  10. tel:2018-07-20 13
  11. mailto:]john.phillips at lp.org
  12. tel:217-412-5973
  13. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  14. tel:2018-07-20 11
  15. tel:2018-07-20 08
  16. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  17. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  18. tel:931.538.9300
  19. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  20. http://Caryn.An/
  21. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  22. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  23. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  24. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  25. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  26. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  27. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  28. http://Caryn.An/
  29. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  30. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  31. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  32. tel:2018-07-20 11
  33. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  34. tel:2018-07-20 08
  35. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  36. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  37. tel:931.538.9300
  38. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  39. http://Caryn.An/
  40. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  41. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  42. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  43. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  44. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  45. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  46. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  47. http://Caryn.An/
  48. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  49. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  50. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  51. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  52. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  53. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  54. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  55. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  56. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  57. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  58. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  59. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  60. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  61. tel:217-412-5973
  62. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  63. tel:2018-07-20 11
  64. tel:2018-07-20 08
  65. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  66. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  67. tel:931.538.9300
  68. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  69. http://Caryn.An/
  70. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  71. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  72. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  73. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  74. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  75. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  76. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  77. http://Caryn.An/
  78. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  79. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  80. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  81. tel:2018-07-20 11
  82. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
  83. tel:2018-07-20 08
  84. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  85. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  86. tel:931.538.9300
  87. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  88. http://Caryn.An/
  89. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  90. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  91. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
  92. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  93. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  94. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
  95. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  96. http://Caryn.An/
  97. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
  98. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
  99. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 100. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 101. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 102. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 103. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 104. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 105. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 106. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 107. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 108. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 109. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 110. tel:931.538.9300
 111. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 112. tel:931.538.9300
 113. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 114. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 115. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 116. mailto::john.phillips at lp.org
 117. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 118. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 119. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 120. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 121. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 122. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 123. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 124. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 125. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 126. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 127. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 128. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 129. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 130. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 131. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 132. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 133. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 134. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 135. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 136. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 137. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 138. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 139. tel:(217) 412-5973
 140. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 141. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 142. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 143. tel:(931) 538-9300
 144. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 145. http://Caryn.An/
 146. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 147. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 148. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 149. http://Caryn.An/
 150. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 151. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 152. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 153. tel:(931) 538-9300
 154. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 155. http://Caryn.An/
 156. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 157. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 158. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 159. http://Caryn.An/
 160. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 161. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 162. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 163. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 164. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 165. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 166. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 167. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 168. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 169. http://Caryn.An/
 170. mailto:
Harlos at LP.org
 171. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 172. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 173. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 174. tel:2018-07-21 10
 175. tel:2018-07-20 21
 176. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 177. tel:2018-07-20 18
 178. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 179. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 180. tel:2018-07-20 13
 181. mailto:]john.phillips at lp.org
 182. tel:217-412-5973
 183. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 184. tel:2018-07-20 11
 185. tel:2018-07-20 08
 186. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 187. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 188. tel:931.538.9300
 189. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 190. http://Caryn.An/
 191. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 192. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 193. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 194. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 195. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 196. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 197. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 198. http://Caryn.An/
 199. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 200. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 201. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 202. tel:2018-07-20 11
 203. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 204. tel:2018-07-20 08
 205. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 206. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 207. tel:931.538.9300
 208. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 209. http://Caryn.An/
 210. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 211. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 212. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 213. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 214. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 215. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 216. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 217. http://Caryn.An/
 218. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 219. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 220. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 221. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 222. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 223. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 224. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 225. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 226. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 227. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 228. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 229. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 230. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 231. tel:217-412-5973
 232. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 233. tel:2018-07-20 11
 234. tel:2018-07-20 08
 235. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 236. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 237. tel:931.538.9300
 238. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 239. http://Caryn.An/
 240. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 241. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 242. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 243. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 244. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 245. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 246. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 247. http://Caryn.An/
 248. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 249. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 250. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 251. tel:2018-07-20 11
 252. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 253. tel:2018-07-20 08
 254. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 255. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 256. tel:931.538.9300
 257. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 258. http://Caryn.An/
 259. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 260. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 261. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 262. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 263. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 264. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 265. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 266. http://Caryn.An/
 267. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 268. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 269. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 270. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 271. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 272. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 273. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 274. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 275. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 276. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 277. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 278. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
 279. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 280. tel:931.538.9300
 281. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 282. tel:931.538.9300
 283. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 284. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 285. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 286. mailto:]john.phillips at lp.org
 287. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 288. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 289. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 290. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 291. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 292. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 293. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 294. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 295. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 296. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 297. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 298. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 299. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 300. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 301. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 302. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 303. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 304. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 305. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 306. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 307. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 308. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 309. tel:(217) 412-5973
 310. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 311. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 312. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 313. tel:(931) 538-9300
 314. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 315. http://Caryn.An/
 316. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 317. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 318. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 319. http://Caryn.An/
 320. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 321. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 322. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 323. tel:(931) 538-9300
 324. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 325. http://Caryn.An/
 326. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 327. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 328. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 329. http://Caryn.An/
 330. mailto:]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 331. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 332. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 333. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 334. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 335. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 336. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 337. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 338. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
 339. http://Caryn.An/
 340. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
 341. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
 342. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
 343. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 344. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 345. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 346. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 347. mailto::john.phillips at lp.org
 348. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 349. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 350. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 351. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 352. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 353. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 354. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 355. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 356. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 357. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 358. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 359. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 360. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 361. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 362. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 363. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 364. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 365. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 366. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 367. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 368. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 369. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 370. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 371. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 372. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 373. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 374. http://Caryn.An/
 375. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 376. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 377. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 378. http://Caryn.An/
 379. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 380. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 381. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 382. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 383. http://Caryn.An/
 384. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 385. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 386. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 387. http://Caryn.An/
 388. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 389. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 390. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 391. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 392. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 393. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 394. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 395. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 396. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 397. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 398. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 399. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 400. mailto::john.phillips at lp.org
 401. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 402. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 403. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 404. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 405. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 406. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 407. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 408. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 409. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 410. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 411. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 412. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 413. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 414. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 415. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 416. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 417. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 418. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 419. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 420. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 421. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 422. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
 423. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 424. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 425. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 426. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 427. http://Caryn.An/
 428. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 429. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 430. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 431. http://Caryn.An/
 432. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 433. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 434. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 435. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 436. http://Caryn.An/
 437. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 438. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 439. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 440. http://Caryn.An/
 441. mailto::elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
 442. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 443. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 444. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 445. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
 446. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 447. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 448. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 449. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
 450. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list