[Lnc-business] The anti-socialism resolution
Alicia Mattson
alicia.mattson at lp.org
Wed Aug 15 04:47:15 EDT 2018
<CAH>Yep. Go ahead and attack me. Don’t care.</CAH>
Ding! There's the victim card making its appearance...
-Alicia
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Yep.
> Go ahead and attack me. Don’t care.
> It is pathetic that a property rights resolution would be
> controversial.
> I get the idea that one is not needed. I don’t agree but I get it.
> I do not get, and I don’t care what excuse is given, for being
> scandalized by the content.
> This is so beyond ridiculous that I really wonder if we could change
> public policy if it was given to us on a platter.
> Wayne knows how the drama usually effects me. He asked me today if any
> of this was bothering me badly with stress.
> I said NOT AT ALL. I have never been more certain of a thing in my
> Libertarian life and I’m appalled that it’s remotely controversial.
> -Caryn Ann
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:43 PM Justin O'Donnell via Lnc-business
> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> We censured Arvin Vohra after the popular outcry against his lack of
> tact and inability to craft a respectable message, even though he
> never
> once said anything contrary to the platform or Statement of
> Principles.
> Yet we can't find consensus amongst ourselves to simply support a
> resolution that reaffirms those very principles, and acknowledges
> that
> they are incompatible with socialist views on property ownership?
> I must have been mistaken for believing that this was the "Party of
> Principle" if we fear the repercussions of simply stating and
> affirming
> our principles.
> ---
> Yours in Liberty,
> Justin O'Donnell
> LNC Region 8 Representative
> LPNH Alternate- LNC Platform Committee
> Chair- LPNH Platform Committee
> Candidate for US Congress, NH-2
> [2]www.odonnell2018.org
> On 2018-08-14 21:28, Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business wrote:
> > Wow. Way to illustrate my point in the most depressing way
> poasible. :(
> >
> > Susan Jane Hogarth
> >
> > Region 5 Alternate
> >
> > [1]919-906-2106
> >
> > On Aug 14, 2018 at 9:19 PM, <[2]Justin O'Donnell via
> Lnc-business>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Its a "You're with the statememt of principles and platform, or
> > you're
> > against it."
> > Justin O'Donnell
> > LNC Region 8 Representative
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. tel:919-906-2106
> > 2. mailto:[3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>
> --
>
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
> 3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 4. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
<CAH>Yep. Go ahead and attack me. Don’t care.</CAH>
Ding! There's the victim card making its appearance...
-Alicia
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Yep.
Go ahead and attack me. Don’t care.
It is pathetic that a property rights resolution would be
controversial.
I get the idea that one is not needed. I don’t agree but I get
it.
I do not get, and I don’t care what excuse is given, for being
scandalized by the content.
This is so beyond ridiculous that I really wonder if we could
change
public policy if it was given to us on a platter.
Wayne knows how the drama usually effects me. He asked me today
if any
of this was bothering me badly with stress.
I said NOT AT ALL. I have never been more certain of a thing in
my
Libertarian life and I’m appalled that it’s remotely
controversial.
-Caryn Ann
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:43 PM Justin O'Donnell via Lnc-business
<[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
We censured Arvin Vohra after the popular outcry against his
lack of
tact and inability to craft a respectable message, even though
he
never
once said anything contrary to the platform or Statement of
Principles.
Yet we can't find consensus amongst ourselves to simply support
a
resolution that reaffirms those very principles, and
acknowledges
that
they are incompatible with socialist views on property
ownership?
I must have been mistaken for believing that this was the
"Party of
Principle" if we fear the repercussions of simply stating and
affirming
our principles.
---
Yours in Liberty,
Justin O'Donnell
LNC Region 8 Representative
LPNH Alternate- LNC Platform Committee
Chair- LPNH Platform Committee
Candidate for US Congress, NH-2
[2][3]www.odonnell2018.org
On 2018-08-14 21:28, Susan Hogarth via Lnc-business wrote:
> Wow. Way to illustrate my point in the most depressing way
poasible. :(
>
> Susan Jane Hogarth
>
> Region 5 Alternate
>
> [1]919-906-2106
>
> On Aug 14, 2018 at 9:19 PM, <[2]Justin O'Donnell via
Lnc-business>
> wrote:
>
> Its a "You're with the statememt of principles and
platform, or
> you're
> against it."
> Justin O'Donnell
> LNC Region 8 Representative
>
> References
>
> 1. tel:919-906-2106
> 2. mailto:[3][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
- [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:[5]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. [6]http://www.odonnell2018.org/
3. mailto:[7]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. mailto:[8]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
5. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. http://www.odonnell2018.org/
7. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
8. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list