[Lnc-business] Request for Amicus Brief

[Oliver Hall]

Greetings,

I have been in touchwith the attorney who is filing an amicus brief on 
behalf of several amici.As of now, the amici signing on to the brief 
include the following:

The Libertarian Party of California
The National Constitution Party
The Republican Party of Idaho
The Utah Republican Native American Caucus

It is likely that other parties may agree to sign on as well.

Also, the attorney sent me an outline of the brief he intends to file. 
If you would like to review that outline, on a confidential basis, 
please contact me directly via email and I'll send it to you. _Please 
keep that outline confidential_.

Thank you,

Oliver

Oliver B. Hall
Special Counsel
Libertarian National Committee
617-953-0161

On 10/28/2018 12:43 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
> Someone asked the LNC's lawyers to chime in, and as one I'll just 
> reinforce what others have said.
>
> The Supreme Court agrees to hear fewer than 1% of the cases appealed 
> to it, and one common feature of those cases it does hear is lots of 
> amicus briefs. It's not causal but it is correlative, so if we think 
> the issue is important (and we do) we want the Court to get lots of 
> separate amicus briefs.
>
> If the Court agrees to hear the case, we then would have the choice 
> (and expense) to file a separate merits brief.
>
> The printing costs is standard (the Supreme Court has some archaic 
> demands on this, including non-standard paper sizes), and the estimate 
> for lawyer costs is a steal. (I've had to pay anywhere between free 
> and $90,000 for this, with an average of about $20,000.) That's my 
> main question - Oliver, do we have a lawyer ready to write it? If so, 
> I'd want us to do our own brief. If not, pairing with someone else's 
> makes sense. The national party perspective and the state party 
> perspective are both valuable for the Court to hear and need not be 
> combined if we can avoid it.
>
> Agree with those who want to leave to Chair and or the Exec Committee 
> to decide, due to the short time frame.
>
> Finally, Oliver just so you know, I'm a member of the Supreme Court 
> Bar (and NY, MD, and DC). While I don't have the bandwidth to write 
> briefs, I am able to be counsel of record on them should we ever need it.
>
>
> JBH

-------------- next part --------------
   Greetings,

   I have been in touch with the attorney who is filing an amicus brief on
   behalf of several amici. As of now, the amici signing on to the brief
   include the following:
   The Libertarian Party of California
   The National Constitution Party
   The Republican Party of Idaho
   The Utah Republican Native American Caucus
   It is likely that other parties may agree to sign on as well.
   Also, the attorney sent me an outline of the brief he intends to file.
   If you would like to review that outline, on a confidential basis,
   please contact me directly via email and I'll send it to you. Please
   keep that outline confidential.
   Thank you,
   Oliver
Oliver B. Hall
Special Counsel
Libertarian National Committee
617-953-0161

   On 10/28/2018 12:43 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:

   Someone asked the LNC's lawyers to chime in, and as one I'll just
   reinforce what others have said.
   The Supreme Court agrees to hear fewer than 1% of the cases appealed to
   it, and one common feature of those cases it does hear is lots of
   amicus briefs. It's not causal but it is correlative, so if we think
   the issue is important (and we do) we want the Court to get lots of
   separate amicus briefs.
   If the Court agrees to hear the case, we then would have the choice
   (and expense) to file a separate merits brief.
   The printing costs is standard (the Supreme Court has some archaic
   demands on this, including non-standard paper sizes), and the estimate
   for lawyer costs is a steal. (I've had to pay anywhere between free and
   $90,000 for this, with an average of about $20,000.) That's my main
   question - Oliver, do we have a lawyer ready to write it? If so, I'd
   want us to do our own brief. If not, pairing with someone else's makes
   sense. The national party perspective and the state party perspective
   are both valuable for the Court to hear and need not be combined if we
   can avoid it.
   Agree with those who want to leave to Chair and or the Exec Committee
   to decide, due to the short time frame.
   Finally, Oliver just so you know, I'm a member of the Supreme Court Bar
   (and NY, MD, and DC). While I don't have the bandwidth to write briefs,
   I am able to be counsel of record on them should we ever need it.
   JBH