[Lnc-business] thoughts on data use by affiliates proposal
Alicia Mattson
agmattson at gmail.com
Sat Mar 9 23:29:25 EST 2019
Regarding the proposal we will consider on Sunday:
In 3.03.2, who is “LPHQ” and how do they “adopt” it. It sounds like a
vote, so then who votes? all employees? Are contractors included? That
doesn't sound like a normal procedure. I recommend that be changed to just
be the Executive Director.
In 3.03.2, it prohibits sharing data in any manner that would provide an
unfair advantage to any campaign which has not yet received the official
party nomination. We only nominate for public office, but perhaps this
should be expanded to also say the data cannot be used for internal
campaigns for party office.
In 3.03.2 it requires that, “All transmission of PII shall be encrypted.”
Is this talking only about when LPHQ sends it to an affiliate, or does it
include any subsequent transmission within the affiliate also?
In 3.03.2, the “service-level agreements” referenced there, who creates
these agreements? Executive Director? Staff? LNC?
In the strikeout language, we should retain the one month notice for file
structure changes. If an affiliate is using something other than the
national CRM, they need time for their developers to make any necessary
programming adjustments so their processes aren't disrupted unnecessarily.
Notice is important so a programmer get a demand to make a change RIGHT
NOW, and they can work it into their schedule reasonably within the next
month.
-Alicia
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list