[Lnc-business] Fwd: Goodbye to a valued colleague.

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

That’s not the presumption.  People are not robots and it’s simply good
sense.

Not even relevant until I hear from Ms.Daugherty.

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:16 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> Let's not presume the EPCC members are inadequate to take on the role due
> to their gender.
>
> -Alicia
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 9:13 AM Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> > Trial?
> >
> > Let me be blunt.  I want to be present for the interview if Ms. Daugherty
> > consents.
> >
> > With all due respect, a group of older men with no female presence
> wanting
> > honest feedback on why we lost such a valuable woman employee is foolish.
> >
> > After all the pomp and circumstance and forms and and trappings are
> > followed, I just want to know what happened - human connection to human
> > connection.  Human connections are not neat and tidy and bound with a
> bow.
> > Sanitized plastic doesn’t help me as an alleged officer know what
> happened.
> >
> >
> > Mr. Bishop-Henchman I respect the heck out of you but our chair has made
> > you a de facto officer ahead of the people actually elected to those
> roles.
> >   His preference may be better than the delegates but that’s not what
> they
> > chose and I value your input but I’m done with gatekeepers.
> >
> > I want to be present.  Simple as that.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 9:11 AM Joe Bishop-Henchman via Lnc-business <
> > lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > > My understanding of the best practice for exit interviews is that they
> > > occur for all departing employees, and that they be done by an HR
> > > professional, preferably one as far removed from the direct supervisor
> > > as possible. Then a couple things can happen. Management or the Board
> > > can get a full copy, or a summarized one. Or the HR person can distill
> > > the conversation into actionable recommendations and convey those. The
> > > latter usually gets more candidness from the departing employee, and
> > > produces something useful to do. Because they are sanitized and
> > > translated, they can be more opaque as to *why* something is a
> > > recommendation, which can be a pro or a con depending on how you look
> at
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Exit interviews are totally uncomfortable for management but it's
> > > important they happen because otherwise managers will assume things
> > > about why an employee leaves rather than knowing. I have gotten useful
> > > information on how to improve how I am as a manager from every exit
> > > interview or how I communicate what we do and structure how we do it,
> > > even ones from awful people who did terrible work (which is certainly
> > > not the case here!).
> > >
> > > I also seriously doubt we would get useful and actionable information
> > > from an "exit interview" in front of the full Board, even in closed
> > > session. No one does that. That's a show trial.
> > >
> > > JBH
> > >
> > > ------------
> > > Joe Bishop-Henchman
> > > LNC Member (At-Large)
> > > joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> > > www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
> > >
> > > On 2019-06-30 12:53, brent.olsen--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> > > > I concur Ms. Mattson.
> > > >
> > > > -Brent
> > > >
> > > > On 2019-06-30 01:42, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business wrote:
> > > >> I would object to subjecting Lauren to a 17-person exit interview
> > > >> during
> > > >> our limited meeting time together in Austin.  That experience might
> go
> > > >> on
> > > >> her list of things she wants to talk about during her exit
> > > >> interview...
> > > >>
> > > >> I think the EPCC is the appropriate body to conduct an exit
> interview,
> > > >> as
> > > >> our policy manual says they "shall also be available to Staff to
> > > >> discuss on
> > > >> a confidential basis the working environment."
> > > >>
> > > >> -Alicia
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > *  In Liberty,*
> >
> > *Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary *-
> > Caryn.Ann.
> > Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
> > *Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee* - LPedia at LP.org
> > Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page at
> > facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/
> >
> > =========================================================================
> > Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism * Re-Legalize
> All
> > Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All Gun Laws *
> > Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish The Fed * End
> > Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and Repeal the Income
> Tax
> > * Privatize Transportation Infrastructure * Free-market Emergency
> Services
> > * Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools To The Private Sector *
> > Eliminate Regulation *
> >
> > *VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or http://www.LP.org <
> http://www.lp.org/
> > >*
> > =========================================================================
> >
>
-- 

*  In Liberty,*

*Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary *- Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
*Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee* - LPedia at LP.org
Call me at 561.523.2250 and follow my public figure page at
facebook.com/pinkflameofliberty/

=========================================================================
Peaceful Commerce With All Nations * Non-interventionism * Re-Legalize All
Drugs * End Government Intrusion In The Bedroom * Repeal All Gun Laws *
Abolish All Taxation * Sound, Free-market Money * Abolish The Fed * End
Corporate & Individual Welfare * Abolish The IRS and Repeal the Income Tax
* Privatize Transportation Infrastructure * Free-market Emergency Services
* Open Migration * Transfer Government Schools To The Private Sector *
Eliminate Regulation *

*VOTE LIBERTARIAN * 800-ELECT-US or http://www.LP.org <http://www.lp.org/>*
=========================================================================