[Lnc-business] correcting a Facebook falsehood

[Alicia Mattson]

I do not know why I am unable to comment on Ms. Harlos' Facebook page, but
since the subject matter is about what allegedly does or doesn't happen on
this list, I am going to say something here to defend myself.

Yesterday, Ms. Harlos told her Facebook readers that when it comes to LNC
minutes, "Further, Ms. Mattson always objects so there is never any chance
for auto-approval. She objects because she disagrees with my style. That is
her prerogative but the LNC already voted that my style was acceptable so
hers is a protest vote that makes it impossible to use the auto-approval.
Didn't know that did you?"

That is demonstrably false, and I don't know why she would say such a thing.

This term I am only aware of ONE TIME that I objected so as to prevent
auto-approval of the minutes until the LNC could vote on a potential
amendment, and that was for the 7/3/18 minutes.  Yet in a public forum this
one time was falsely portrayed as "always" so that there is allegedly
"never any chance" for auto-approval.  The other times that auto-approval
has not been used this term, it has been because the drafts were not
provided by the required dates to be eligible for auto-approval.

Just want to clear that up.

-Alicia