[Lnc-business] Social media ownership
Susan Hogarth
susan.hogarth at lp.org
Sat Dec 14 12:19:07 EST 2019
Imagine calls for impeachment of a sitting president by the chair of the libertarian party being ‘divisive’ within the party 🙄
Susan Jane Hogarth
Region 5 Alternate
919-906-2106 (tel:919-906-2106)
>
> On Dec 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM, <Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business (mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org)> wrote:
>
>
>
> One small request: if something divisive like this is going to be shared in
> the future, it would be nice to give a heads up. I've gotten several
> messages all morning about this and was not prepared for damage control.
>
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 09:12 Richard Longstreth <richard.longstreth at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the information. I really can't say anything else other than
> > I am disappointed. I appreciate the process being followed, however.
> >
> > Richard Longstreth
> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)
> > Libertarian National Committee
> > richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 931.538.9300
> >
> > Sent from my Mobile Device
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 08:31 Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business <
> > lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The APRC approved it after it went through the normal review process.
> >>
> >> -Nick
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 8:18 AM Richard Longstreth via Lnc-business <
> >> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Friends,
> >> >
> >> > I've got a real problem with this Facebook post:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10157723161582726&id=5978057725
> >> >
> >> > I understand the nuance of stating that it came from the desk of the
> >> chair
> >> > but it was posted by the national social media account. Did the APRC
> >> > approve? Does the chair have authority to state his opinions and use the
> >> > reach of the national page to advance his thoughts in this matter? Can
> >> we
> >> > all issue posts from our desk and have the page post them?
> >> >
> >> > We are getting some pretty significant backlash on this one - both from
> >> > those who agree and disagree. This isn't a question for me of agreeing
> >> or
> >> > not with the post. I am disturbed that we as a party have now commented
> >> at
> >> > all in this way. Even worse on the national social media page without
> >> the
> >> > LNC agreeing or passing a resolution. Yes, Nick represents the party and
> >> > has the freedom to share his personal opinions. I just do not believe
> >> his
> >> > personal opinions should be shared through our national social media
> >> > without consent of this body.
> >> >
> >> > If the APRC did approve, it is somewhat moot, but this was not done with
> >> > wisdom or forethought to the effects this would have or the optics of
> >> > sharing on national page to the public at large. It isn't even a shared
> >> > post which would give some distance from our brand. I am very
> >> disappointed.
> >> >
> >> > Richard Longstreth
> >> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)
> >> > Libertarian National Committee
> >> > richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >> > 931.538.9300
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my Mobile Device
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list