[Lnc-business] previous notice - the policy manual project

[Tim Hagan]

Thanks to Alicia, Caryn Ann, and Jim for working on this. I found some 
discrepancies between the PDF and the Word document.

On the PDF, page 8, line 13 has Libertarian National Committee crossed 
out, but not replaced with LNC.  The Word document has a new proposal to 
replace "Libertarian National Committee" with "LNC".

PDF page 24, line 14 has the capital P crossed out but does not show 
replacing with lowercase p. The Word document says: use lowercase for 
"Platform".

PDF page 25, line 33 has the blue addition crossed out instead of 
underlined. The intent is clear.

PDF page 32, lines 29 & 30 have a change of changing numbers to letters 
not mentioned in the Word document. Also, should the list be broken out, 
like others?

PDF page 68, end note 10 needs to add parentheses around 2/3.

Page 20, line 10 the Word document has a new proposal to replace "or" 
with comma but the PDF shows only removing "or".

Some of the new proposals don't appear in the PDF. I assume it's a work 
in progress.

---
Tim Hagan
Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee

On 2020-01-18 23:27, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business wrote:
> At the November LNC meeting, the LNC directed me and Ms. Harlos to 
> bring
> back to the LNC at this meeting a list of the stylistic policy manual
> changes on which we can agree.  Though the LNC did not direct Dr. Lark 
> to
> participate in the task, I indicated at the time that I wanted his 
> review
> also, and he was kind enough to provide feedback and catch a few more 
> items.
> 
> Would you like some good news?  There are more than two hundred 
> proposed
> changes that Ms. Harlos, Dr. Lark, and I can all support or at least
> tolerate.   In the attached Word document, the first section is a 
> listing
> of those with agreement to date.  The numbers at the start of each line 
> are
> references to the PageNumber/LineNumber in the other attachment.
> 
> The other attachment is the copy of the policy manual to which Ms. 
> Harlos
> had added line numbers for easy reference, and she used 
> insert/strikeout
> formats to show her proposed changes.  This is no longer the current 
> policy
> manual, as we have made other changes in the interim, but using this
> version still allows us to all easily understand where the changes are
> being proposed.
> 
> The second section in the attached Word document contains 
> non-substantive
> items that are either my proposed alternative to Ms. Harlos’ proposal, 
> or
> they are new items suggested by either myself or Dr. Lark.  This is an
> incredibly tedious project.  With the holidays and other items on both 
> of
> our plates, Ms. Harlos is still reviewing this second category, and it 
> may
> be that before the meeting that some of these will move to the first
> “agree” section.  Since these are different/new from what you’ve seen
> before, I wanted to go ahead and provide previous notice for them.
> 
> The third section are also new/alternate proposals from me, however 
> they
> are not just editorial or stylistic in nature.  They are too 
> substantive to
> be hidden in a huge list of Oxford commas, capitalization, etc.
> 
> The items marked in the PDF but not listed in the Word document are the
> things that do not have agreement.
> 
> This division will hopefully allow us to handle a whole lot of changes 
> in a
> single motion.  I’d like to take up separate motions on the two items I
> marked as substantive.
> 
> -Alicia