[Lnc-business] COC Report update

[Sam Goldstein]

Joe,

I'm of the opinion that it would be up to the Region that has appointed 
that person to a delegate spot if he/she is allowed to vote for their
Regional Rep and also for that person's home Region.  The LNC has never, 
to my knowledge, tried to dictate how the Regions pick their delegates 
or how they function internally.

---
Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
Libertarian National Committee
317-850-0726 Cell

On 2020-04-29 11:34, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
> The balloting is done as quickly as possible. The clock is left open
> to give the regions time to finalize agreements and select regional
> representatives. It's the difference between running one set of
> elections and nine sets of elections simultaneously.
> 
> Since it's on my mind, the regional election bylaw has an ambiguity -
> regional representatives are elected by "the delegates from the
> region." Say a Florida resident (R2) is seated with the Washington
> delegation (R1). Can that person vote in both R1 and R2 elections, R1
> only, or R2 only? The two people I've asked so far say it's been
> inconsistently treated in past regional rep elections. So if anyone
> has strong feelings on what the right answer is, please share.
> 
> JBH
> 
> ------------
> Joe Bishop-Henchman
> LNC Member (At-Large)
> joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
> 
> On 2020-04-29 11:21, Sam Goldstein wrote:
>> Joe,
>> 
>> Thanks for the update.  This version seems more practical than the
>> first draft but still seems ungainly since it appears that our
>> national convention will take about 5-6 weeks!
>> 
>> I look forward to discussing various options with you and other LNC
>> members on Saturday.
>> 
>> Live Free,
>> 
>> ---
>> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
>> Libertarian National Committee
>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>> 
>> On 2020-04-29 11:04, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>> Attached. It's still draft as the Bylaws Committee does not plan on
>>> adopting it unless the LNC decides to go in that direction. We have a
>>> meeting scheduled for May 3 for that eventuality.
>>> 
>>> The Bylaws Committee is not making a recommendation to the LNC, just
>>> preparing for any eventuality that may require Bylaws actions.
>>> 
>>> JBH
>>> 
>>> ------------
>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>> joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>> www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>> 
>>> On 2020-04-28 22:33, Sam Goldstein wrote:
>>>> Ken,
>>>> 
>>>> If that is the case then I would suggest that Mr. Bishop-Henchman
>>>> submit the language for Option 3 that has been approved by the 
>>>> Bylaws
>>>> Committee or their most recent language if they have not yet 
>>>> approved
>>>> a proposal to the LNC. That would give the LNC  an additional option
>>>> to consider this Saturday.
>>>> 
>>>> ---the v
>>>> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>> 
>>>> On 2020-04-28 20:39, Ken Moellman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Some of you have received the report and for others it is still
>>>>> in-flight.  I have been informed by Mr. Bishop-Henchman that the
>>>>> report inaccurately characterizes the state of the bylaws proposal
>>>>> for scenario #3.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This was unintentional.  Some members of the COC had spoken with
>>>>> several bylaws committee members after the original COC/Bylaws
>>>>> meeting who gave us that impression, but I did not reach out to Mr.
>>>>> Bishop-Henchman directly. This was my error, and I apologize for 
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ken
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>> send an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.
>>>> 
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>> send
>>>> an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.