[Lnc-business] COC Report update
Francis Wendt
francis.wendt at lp.org
Fri May 1 22:06:59 EDT 2020
I do believe this has been inconsistently treated in the past. Howard
Wetsman, was seated as a Montana delegate in 2018, but did not attend
the region 1 meeting. Anecdotal, but informative.
---
FRANCIS WENDT
LNC Region 1 Alternate
406.595.5111
On 2020-04-29 09:34, Joe Bishop-Henchman via Lnc-business wrote:
> The balloting is done as quickly as possible. The clock is left open
> to give the regions time to finalize agreements and select regional
> representatives. It's the difference between running one set of
> elections and nine sets of elections simultaneously.
>
> Since it's on my mind, the regional election bylaw has an ambiguity -
> regional representatives are elected by "the delegates from the
> region." Say a Florida resident (R2) is seated with the Washington
> delegation (R1). Can that person vote in both R1 and R2 elections, R1
> only, or R2 only? The two people I've asked so far say it's been
> inconsistently treated in past regional rep elections. So if anyone
> has strong feelings on what the right answer is, please share.
>
> JBH
>
> ------------
> Joe Bishop-Henchman
> LNC Member (At-Large)
> joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>
> On 2020-04-29 11:21, Sam Goldstein wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>> Thanks for the update. This version seems more practical than the
>> first draft but still seems ungainly since it appears that our
>> national convention will take about 5-6 weeks!
>>
>> I look forward to discussing various options with you and other LNC
>> members on Saturday.
>>
>> Live Free,
>>
>> ---
>> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
>> Libertarian National Committee
>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>
>> On 2020-04-29 11:04, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>> Attached. It's still draft as the Bylaws Committee does not plan on
>>> adopting it unless the LNC decides to go in that direction. We have a
>>> meeting scheduled for May 3 for that eventuality.
>>>
>>> The Bylaws Committee is not making a recommendation to the LNC, just
>>> preparing for any eventuality that may require Bylaws actions.
>>>
>>> JBH
>>>
>>> ------------
>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>> joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>> www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>
>>> On 2020-04-28 22:33, Sam Goldstein wrote:
>>>> Ken,
>>>>
>>>> If that is the case then I would suggest that Mr. Bishop-Henchman
>>>> submit the language for Option 3 that has been approved by the
>>>> Bylaws
>>>> Committee or their most recent language if they have not yet
>>>> approved
>>>> a proposal to the LNC. That would give the LNC an additional option
>>>> to consider this Saturday.
>>>>
>>>> ---the v
>>>> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>
>>>> On 2020-04-28 20:39, Ken Moellman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some of you have received the report and for others it is still
>>>>> in-flight. I have been informed by Mr. Bishop-Henchman that the
>>>>> report inaccurately characterizes the state of the bylaws proposal
>>>>> for scenario #3.
>>>>>
>>>>> This was unintentional. Some members of the COC had spoken with
>>>>> several bylaws committee members after the original COC/Bylaws
>>>>> meeting who gave us that impression, but I did not reach out to Mr.
>>>>> Bishop-Henchman directly. This was my error, and I apologize for
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ken
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>> send an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send
>>>> an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list