[Lnc-business] COC Report update

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Mr. Wendt not attending is voluntary.  He had the right to vote.  I
informed all delegation chairs of this when I was regional representative.
My predecessor did likewise.

*In Liberty,*

* Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
(part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *



On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:39 PM Erin Adams via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> I agree with Caryn Ann on this specifically in the case of out-of-state
> alternate or delegates who are seated with Oklahoma. We determined at the
> last convention that per our own State bylaws the minute we accept an
> out-of-state alternate or delegate we also accept them at least for the
> duration of that convention as a member of the Oklahoma libertarian party
> and as such they represented us in our caucus votes. Region 7 also voted at
> caucus to accept that
>
> Erin Adams Region 7 alt.
>
> On May 1, 2020 9:06 PM, Francis Wendt via Lnc-business <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> I do believe this has been inconsistently treated in the past. Howard
> Wetsman, was seated as a Montana delegate in 2018, but did not attend
> the region 1 meeting. Anecdotal, but informative.
>
> ---
> FRANCIS WENDT
> LNC Region 1 Alternate
>   406.595.5111
>
> On 2020-04-29 09:34, Joe Bishop-Henchman via Lnc-business wrote:
> > The balloting is done as quickly as possible. The clock is left open
> > to give the regions time to finalize agreements and select regional
> > representatives. It's the difference between running one set of
> > elections and nine sets of elections simultaneously.
> >
> > Since it's on my mind, the regional election bylaw has an ambiguity -
> > regional representatives are elected by "the delegates from the
> > region." Say a Florida resident (R2) is seated with the Washington
> > delegation (R1). Can that person vote in both R1 and R2 elections, R1
> > only, or R2 only? The two people I've asked so far say it's been
> > inconsistently treated in past regional rep elections. So if anyone
> > has strong feelings on what the right answer is, please share.
> >
> > JBH
> >
> > ------------
> > Joe Bishop-Henchman
> > LNC Member (At-Large)
> > joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> > www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
> >
> > On 2020-04-29 11:21, Sam Goldstein wrote:
> >> Joe,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the update.  This version seems more practical than the
> >> first draft but still seems ungainly since it appears that our
> >> national convention will take about 5-6 weeks!
> >>
> >> I look forward to discussing various options with you and other LNC
> >> members on Saturday.
> >>
> >> Live Free,
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
> >> Libertarian National Committee
> >> 317-850-0726 Cell
> >>
> >> On 2020-04-29 11:04, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
> >>> Attached. It's still draft as the Bylaws Committee does not plan on
> >>> adopting it unless the LNC decides to go in that direction. We have a
> >>> meeting scheduled for May 3 for that eventuality.
> >>>
> >>> The Bylaws Committee is not making a recommendation to the LNC, just
> >>> preparing for any eventuality that may require Bylaws actions.
> >>>
> >>> JBH
> >>>
> >>> ------------
> >>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
> >>> LNC Member (At-Large)
> >>> joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
> >>> www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
> >>>
> >>> On 2020-04-28 22:33, Sam Goldstein wrote:
> >>>> Ken,
> >>>>
> >>>> If that is the case then I would suggest that Mr. Bishop-Henchman
> >>>> submit the language for Option 3 that has been approved by the
> >>>> Bylaws
> >>>> Committee or their most recent language if they have not yet
> >>>> approved
> >>>> a proposal to the LNC. That would give the LNC  an additional option
> >>>> to consider this Saturday.
> >>>>
> >>>> ---the v
> >>>> Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
> >>>> Libertarian National Committee
> >>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2020-04-28 20:39, Ken Moellman wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Some of you have received the report and for others it is still
> >>>>> in-flight.  I have been informed by Mr. Bishop-Henchman that the
> >>>>> report inaccurately characterizes the state of the bylaws proposal
> >>>>> for scenario #3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was unintentional.  Some members of the COC had spoken with
> >>>>> several bylaws committee members after the original COC/Bylaws
> >>>>> meeting who gave us that impression, but I did not reach out to Mr.
> >>>>> Bishop-Henchman directly. This was my error, and I apologize for
> >>>>> it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ken
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >>>>> send an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.
> >>>>
> >>>>  --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "LNC Gsuite Migration" group.
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >>>> send
> >>>> an email to lnctest+unsubscribe at lphq.org.
>
>
>