[Lnc-business] Policy Manual Vote Discussion Thread

[Elizabeth Van Horn]

Thank you Alex.

I agree with everything you've asked.  This motion, which went straight 
to a vote smells bad. Particularly, after seeing how there's some vile 
rumors on social media about LNC members.

Because this motion smacks of having an origin tied to those rumors.  
Which would explain why it wasn't created with transparent and 
introduced straight to a vote.

Further, my objections are that it means that fellow LNC members are 
falling prey to rumor and manipulations.

IF that's not the case, I'd be interesting in hearing about the sudden 
reason for this, and why it was handled they way it was. Plus, who 
authored this?

---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 Representative (IN, MI, OH, KY)



On 2020-05-05 11:07, Alex Merced (LNC Vice Chair) via Lnc-business 
wrote:
> My Questions
> 
> 1. Why not a public call for sponsors (I’m understanding of
> discussions off-list, but why not go through the traditional call for
> sponsors on the list since that’s public anyways?)
> 
> 2. Is it wise or appropriate to bind the following LNC this late in our 
> term?
> 
> Note: I do agree with the substance of the changes, most organization
> usually have rules like this to prevent conflicts of interest. I just
> feel weird about how this came to a vote and just want clarity on the
> two points above.
> 
> Alex Merced
> Vice Chair of the Libertarian National Committee/LP