[Lnc-business] Impartiality of Chair

[Richard Longstreth]

Fellow LNC members,

I feel we were presented with an example of only one thing the Chair voted
on in that poll, not the full picture. I just found the same voting thread
and want to share the other option Mr Sarwarck voted on (attached picture)
in which he also says he will be attending and supporting the in person
section as well. It is possible to hold both beliefs and I'm not sure this
so much falls into bias given full context.

Calls to demonize our chair are just as bad as our chair pushing an agenda.
Be fair with each other. I will call out what I see but would hope that I
would be presented with the whole story to judge fairly. Yes, Nick should
remain impartial, however, by voting for multiple sides, he seems to be
maintaining that to a degree.

I still think it best that ALL of us remain neutral on such polling and let
the body do as it does if it does. Painting each other or delegates as
enemies of the party for disagreeing with your interpretation or viewpoint
is very troublesome.


Richard Longstreth
Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)
Libertarian National Committee
richard.longstreth at lp.org
931.538.9300

Sent from my Mobile Device

On Sun, May 10, 2020, 22:04 Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> We've been snowed.  Simple as that.  There is no intent to honor the
> hard-won compromise, and I am inclined to urge the LNC to take other action
> as there is zero confidence in what was voted on.
>
> Let me give you all the simple reality here.  We are duty bound to consider
> worst case scenario.  We have a bullshit online fiasco and get hit with 51
> lawsuits AND no fundraising convention.  We are bankrupt.  Reality bites.
> There are already actual party members ready to sue. I think that is
> terrible, but it is real.
>
> The Adams motion is the route we should have taken.  Period.  End.  That is
> the ONLY compromise that will stop these games, and I ask everyone where
> they stand.  And if Chair Sarwark tries once again to insinuate "agree with
> me or I will accept your resignation" don't let anyone face that alone as
> we allowed Ms. Mattson to.  Shame on us.
>
> ONE person has consistently subverted the will of this body.  The one
> person that should never do it.  Our chair.  Wake up.
>
> *  In Liberty,*
> * Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
> (part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
> communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
> found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
> pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know.  *
>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM Steven Nekhaila <steven.nekhaila at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > If Chairman Sarwark truly wishes to convince the delegation to take
> > action that would go against the motion the body set forward, I would
> > implore him to announce his intentions now and allow Vice Chairman
> > Merced to gavel the convention.
> >
> > Nick, please divulge your intentions to us.
> >
> > In Liberty,
> >
> > Steven Nekhaila
> > Region 2 Representative
> > Libertarian National Committee
> >
> > Impotentes defendere libertatum non possunt
> > "Those without power cannot defend freedom"
> >
> > On 2020-05-10 11:35 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> > > I know the rules Mr. Phillips.  Consult me privately if you wish to
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *  In Liberty,*
> > > * Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
> > > (part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
> > > communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
> > > found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social
> > > faux
> > > pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know.
> > > *
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:33 PM <john.phillips at lp.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am not even dead set against online and I agree this is
> > >> inappropriate.
> > >> Yet again.
> > >>
> > >> I find myself regretting both not pursuing my first question harder on
> > >> Saturday rather than backing off, and my motion to cancel the next
> > >> meeting.
> > >>
> > >> I honestly find myself wondering what options we have for disciplinary
> > >> action at this point.  Yes I should be more familiar with such rules,
> > >> but
> > >> there it is.
> > >>
> > >> John Phillips
> > >> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> > >> Cell 217-412-5973
> > >>
> > >> On May 10, 2020 10:17 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
> > >> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mr. Chair, once again, I implore you to maintain the impartiality
> > >> required.  I am concerned about your public pledge to support making
> > >> amending the agenda on May 22 to make the entire convention online
> > >> over
> > >> the
> > >> wishes of the LNC.
> > >>
> > >> See attached screenshot for pledge and Mr. Sarwark's name pledging to
> > >> do
> > >> so.
> > >>
> > >> It would be more convenient for me to stay silent.  Duty demands that
> > >> I
> > >> not
> > >> be.
> > >>
> > >> *  In Liberty,*
> > >> * Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
> > >> (part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
> > >> communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If
> > >> anyone
> > >> found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social
> > >> faux
> > >> pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know.
> > >> *
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot_20200511-061104.png
Type: image/png
Size: 74080 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20200511/6f61f589/attachment-0001.png>