[Lnc-business] One-Question LP Convention Survey

[Elizabeth Van Horn]

You wrote:
----
"We've already got a really great response rate, so I think in the end 
we'll have reasonable confidence in what to expect.

The decisions the COC makes on Thursday night about financial risks will 
be much more informed with less guessing."
------

That is the information needed. Thank you Alicia.

---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 Representative (IN, MI, OH, KY)



On 2020-05-26 13:36, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business wrote:
> As with the debate tokens we sent out before, it might take 24 hours 
> for
> some of these to pop out of the internet and into people's inboxes.  
> The
> deadline is tomorrow evening, so there's time for that to happen.  As
> always, if an email isn't in an inbox, look in spam, even look in the 
> trash
> folder as some people found the debate tokens there.
> 
> I used the list after the Credentials Committee's final meeting, and 
> though
> debate tokens only went to delegates, this attendance question was sent 
> to
> delegates and alternates on that list.  It will not, of course, have 
> the
> three names added on the final day.
> 
> It's not a vote/token that determines or heavily influences our
> presidential nominees.  A handful of the alternates' email addresses 
> had
> similar issues to what I previously described with the delegates email
> addresses, however I'm not going to spend the extensive amount of time 
> I
> did before to make sure that everyone gets to participate.  As I 
> suggested
> last night, the goal here is to get a solid representative sample, and 
> then
> extrapolate the results to the whole.  We've already got a really great
> response rate, so I think in the end we'll have reasonable confidence 
> in
> what to expect.
> 
> The decisions the COC makes on Thursday night about financial risks 
> will be
> much more informed with less guessing.
> 
> -Alicia
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Alex Merced (LNC Vice Chair) via
> Lnc-business <lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> 
>> Alicia mentioned in the chat during the COC meeting we all attended 
>> early
>> on about her sending it out the next day and no one objected at that 
>> time.
>> 
>> Email is generally a bad way to mass communicate in today’s world of 
>> spam
>> filters and firewalls, but there really isn’t a better way on short 
>> notice.
>> I received it and I didn’t see anything particularly objectionable 
>> about
>> the wording.
>> 
>> Ideal world all delegates would be reachable on a reliable platform 
>> LPHQ
>> administrates kinda of like the LP slack channel which people can join 
>> at
>> LP.org/chat.
>> 
>> Alex Merced
>> Vice Chair of the Libertarian National Committee/LP
>> 
>> > On May 26, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business <
>> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Why this matters:
>> >
>> > 1)  Not all delegates and alternates are getting the survey.
>> > 2)  Those who wanted the survey were not consulted on language or
>> anything about the survey.
>> > 3)  The survey should have been sent from LPHQ.
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Elizabeth Van Horn
>> > LNC Region 3 Representative (IN, MI, OH, KY)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 2020-05-26 12:41, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business wrote:
>> >> I'm seeing people say they did not get the survey that was sent to
>> >> delegates and alternates.
>> >> Some delegates and alternates are saying this.  Then, I was surprised to
>> >> learn that Alicia Mattson sent out that survey.  Without input from
>> >> others on the wording.
>> >> Survey went out at 4:30 AM for us in eastern time.  Likely to be buried
>> >> by the time people look at their in-box.  Hell, I didn't even know it
>> >> was there, until I saw Sam post something on FB.  Then I started
>> >> alerting people about it.  Already seeing people question why the survey
>> >> is worded the way it is.
>> >> How things are done matter.  I'm not happy about this.
>> 
>>