[Lnc-business] Observations

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

I observe that the reason the contract was able to be renegotiated is
because you finally re-engaged after multiple times refusing to do so, and
the only reason the opportunity presented itself is because Mr. Hayes
arranged to have Mr. Rosen present.  I am very glad things are moving along
but your insinuation here that it is because you unjustly removed Mr. Hayes
is false and not worthy of you.  You removed a political opponent simply
because he was a political opponent.  I find it surprising that anyone
wants to volunteer on any committee after treatment like that.  You could
have renegotiated this weeks ago.  Instead you postured on social media on
how it was irresponsible to have a convention at all.   Is that no longer
your position?  Your actions are mecurial and arbitrary.

Any motions I make are not out of spite.  They are what I believe is in the
best interest of the Party.  We disagree.  That is fine.  But I will
correct the record.  Not everything is about you.

*In Liberty,*

* Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
(part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *



On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:42 AM Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Less than 24 hours after replacing the Convention Oversight Committee
> Chair, the contract with the Rosen Group has been successfully
> renegotiated. Members of the Convention Oversight Committee and the
> Libertarian National Committee are taking the opportunity to review it
> prior to my execution of the contract on Monday.
>
> In that same period of time, I have received 110 separate emails from LNC
> and COC members, not counting the roughly 100 emails from members
> expressing their opinions about my actions.
>
> For the benefit of those who may not be aware, I don't find the 100th
> instance of being accused of  “dishonesty,” “abusing power,” or starting a
> “shitshow” more persuasive than the first. Calling me a “rat fuck,” as one
> member has repeatedly and publicly done has not changed my mind, though it
> has provided me more information about the member's character, temperament,
> and fitness for any position in the Libertarian Party.
>
> Members of this committee have the freedom to continue to abuse each other,
> obstruct the conduct of the party's business, and waste time with fruitless
> motions to try to spite me. How they choose to use their freedoms has not
> gone unnoticed.
>
> Yours in liberty,
> Nick
>