[Lnc-business] EMAIL BALLOT 200531-1 APPEAL FROM THE RULING OF THE CHAIR CONCERNING REMOVAL OF DANIEL HAYES FROM THE COC

[Sam Goldstein]

Please clarify once more how to vote on this issue.  A Yes vote sustains 
the ruling of the Chair and a No vote overturns the ruling of the Chair?

Simple majority or some other threshold?

Live Free,

---
Sam Goldstein, At Large Member
Libertarian National Committee
317-850-0726 Cell

On 2020-05-31 16:18, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> EMAIL BALLOT 200531-1  APPEAL FROM THE RULING OF THE CHAIR CONCERNING
> REMOVAL OF DANIEL HAYES FROM THE COC
> 
> We have an electronic mail ballot.
> 
> Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by June 7, 2020 at 11:59:59 pm
> Pacific time.
> 
> Co-Sponsors:  Goldstein, Harlos, Longstreth, Phillips, Smith
> 
> =============================================
> 
> 
> Motion: The Chair has ruled he can not only remove Daniel Hayes as CoC
> chair but also from the committee entirely.  Harlos appeals from the 
> ruling
> of the chair that he can remove Hayes from the committee without CoC
> approval since appointment required CoC approval.
> 
> =============================================
> 
> THRESHOLD REQUIRED:  A majority vote is required to overturn the ruling 
> of
> the chair.
> 
> 
> You can keep track of the Secretary's manual tally of votes here:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VntkXkkuQouUiWbt9bnI_TjSMKDiTaDDpvsYtTmJdhE/edit#gid=1053534570.
> Votes are noted with a link to the actual ballot cast for verification. 
> You
> can find the time that the manual tally was last updated at the bottom 
> of
> the sheet.
> 
> 
> Please notify me of any discrepancies.
> 
> *  In Liberty,*
> * Personal Note:  I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
> (part of the autism spectrum).  This can affect inter-personal
> communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas.  If anyone
> found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social 
> faux
> pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know.  
> *