[Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Further this is a request to the voting members of the ex comm.  I could
have just put this on the EC list but did not.  But you quite literally
have no vote here.

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:32 AM Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is line with RONR and my right.  Are we denying member rights now?
>
> This is the proper course. I suggest you talk to a parliamentarian.
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:17 AM Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> This is highly improper and not in line with the policy manual. Are we
>> literally making up up rules as we go?
>>
>> This is starting to look very very bad. LPNH falling to pieces is no
>> reason for us to do the same. In my brief absence it seems as if we just
>> threw the policy manual out the window.
>>
>> Francis Wendt
>> LNC Region 1 Representative
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Lnc-business <lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org> on behalf of Caryn
>> Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 14, 2021 12:10:20 AM
>> *To:* Libertarian National Committee list <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> *Cc:* Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> *Subject:* [Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm
>>
>> I am asking the chair to not preside as his conduct is a main issue of
>> contention and for a chair pro tem for that meeting be appointed (which
>> per
>> RONR will need approval from the body).  The chair pro tem need not be an
>> LNC member.  I recommend Dr Lark.--
>>
>> *  In Liberty,*
>>
> --
>
> *  In Liberty,*
>
>
-- 

*  In Liberty,*