[Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm

[Richard Longstreth]

I leave that to the chair prerogative and do not join that call. I have not
seen a conflict of interest arise in his comments and a chair is allowed to
indulge the body with his thoughts provided they do not cross a line into
debate. We can obtain his viewpoint and explanation and his integrity as
chair does not need be compromised.

Only someone who has already drawn conclusions or is receiving some sort of
benefit from the situation (financial or otherwise) should recuse
themselves from participation lest we appear to be a kangaroo court of
sorts. If that is any member of the ExComm I would expect them to
professionally declare so prior to beginning our meeting tomorrow.

Richard Longstreth
At Large Representative
Libertarian National Committee
richard.longstreth at lp.org
931.538.9300

Sent from my Mobile Device

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 02:55 Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> I put it on the LNC list for transparency purposes.  Another case of no
> matter what I do certain people will want to villify it so I do what I
> think is right.  I do find it delicious how there is never any call for
> slow deliberation when it comes to attacking me.
>
> *  In Liberty,*
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:37 AM Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > This seems to be on the business list, thus a matter put before the LNC.
> > You should have put it on the excom list if that is who it was intended
> for.
> >
> > Francis Wendt
> > LNC Region 1 Representative
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
> > *Sent:* Monday, June 14, 2021 12:34:03 AM
> > *To:* Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
> > *Cc:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm
> >
> > Further this is a request to the voting members of the ex comm.  I could
> > have just put this on the EC list but did not.  But you quite literally
> > have no vote here.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:32 AM Caryn Ann Harlos <
> > carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is line with RONR and my right.  Are we denying member rights now?
> >
> > This is the proper course. I suggest you talk to a parliamentarian.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:17 AM Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > This is highly improper and not in line with the policy manual. Are we
> > literally making up up rules as we go?
> >
> > This is starting to look very very bad. LPNH falling to pieces is no
> > reason for us to do the same. In my brief absence it seems as if we just
> > threw the policy manual out the window.
> >
> > Francis Wendt
> > LNC Region 1 Representative
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Lnc-business <lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org> on behalf of Caryn
> > Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
> > *Sent:* Monday, June 14, 2021 12:10:20 AM
> > *To:* Libertarian National Committee list <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
> > *Cc:* Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
> > *Subject:* [Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm
> >
> > I am asking the chair to not preside as his conduct is a main issue of
> > contention and for a chair pro tem for that meeting be appointed (which
> per
> > RONR will need approval from the body).  The chair pro tem need not be an
> > LNC member.  I recommend Dr Lark.--
> >
> > *  In Liberty,*
> >
> > --
> >
> > *  In Liberty,*
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *  In Liberty,*
> >
> >
>