[Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

No one is asking for a recusal.  This is standard RONR and required by RONR
and a practice JBH has regularly followed for motions.  I am sure the Party
Parliamentarian would be glad to advise the EC on this.

*  In Liberty,*



On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 2:40 AM Richard Longstreth <
richard.longstreth at lp.org> wrote:

> I leave that to the chair prerogative and do not join that call. I have
> not seen a conflict of interest arise in his comments and a chair is
> allowed to indulge the body with his thoughts provided they do not cross a
> line into debate. We can obtain his viewpoint and explanation and his
> integrity as chair does not need be compromised.
>
> Only someone who has already drawn conclusions or is receiving some sort
> of benefit from the situation (financial or otherwise) should recuse
> themselves from participation lest we appear to be a kangaroo court of
> sorts. If that is any member of the ExComm I would expect them to
> professionally declare so prior to beginning our meeting tomorrow.
>
> Richard Longstreth
> At Large Representative
> Libertarian National Committee
> richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 931.538.9300
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 02:55 Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
>> I put it on the LNC list for transparency purposes.  Another case of no
>> matter what I do certain people will want to villify it so I do what I
>> think is right.  I do find it delicious how there is never any call for
>> slow deliberation when it comes to attacking me.
>>
>> *  In Liberty,*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:37 AM Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This seems to be on the business list, thus a matter put before the LNC.
>> > You should have put it on the excom list if that is who it was intended
>> for.
>> >
>> > Francis Wendt
>> > LNC Region 1 Representative
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > *From:* Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> > *Sent:* Monday, June 14, 2021 12:34:03 AM
>> > *To:* Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
>> > *Cc:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> > *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm
>> >
>> > Further this is a request to the voting members of the ex comm.  I could
>> > have just put this on the EC list but did not.  But you quite literally
>> > have no vote here.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:32 AM Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> > carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is line with RONR and my right.  Are we denying member rights now?
>> >
>> > This is the proper course. I suggest you talk to a parliamentarian.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:17 AM Francis Wendt <francis.wendt at lp.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > This is highly improper and not in line with the policy manual. Are we
>> > literally making up up rules as we go?
>> >
>> > This is starting to look very very bad. LPNH falling to pieces is no
>> > reason for us to do the same. In my brief absence it seems as if we just
>> > threw the policy manual out the window.
>> >
>> > Francis Wendt
>> > LNC Region 1 Representative
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > *From:* Lnc-business <lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org> on behalf of
>> Caryn
>> > Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> > *Sent:* Monday, June 14, 2021 12:10:20 AM
>> > *To:* Libertarian National Committee list <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> > *Cc:* Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> > *Subject:* [Lnc-business] Tuesday’s excomm
>> >
>> > I am asking the chair to not preside as his conduct is a main issue of
>> > contention and for a chair pro tem for that meeting be appointed (which
>> per
>> > RONR will need approval from the body).  The chair pro tem need not be
>> an
>> > LNC member.  I recommend Dr Lark.--
>> >
>> > *  In Liberty,*
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > *  In Liberty,*
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > *  In Liberty,*
>> >
>> >
>>
>