<div dir="ltr"><div><div>I vote Yes on Email Ballot 2014-09: LNC-Discuss Public v2.<br><br></div>Daniel Wiener<br></div>Region 4 Representative<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Alicia Mattson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:agmattson@gmail.com" target="_blank">agmattson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">We have an electronic mail ballot.<br> <br><b><u>Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by July 21, 2014 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.<br>
</u></b> <br><u>Co-Sponsors:</u> Dan Wiener, Sam Goldstein, Vicki Kirkland, Bill Redpath<br>
<br><u>Motion:</u> to amend the Policy Manual by inserting a new sub-section 4 to Section 2.07 PARTY RECORDS:<br><br>4) EMAIL DISCUSSION LIST. Copies of LNC-Discuss emails from June 30, 2014 forward, shall be made publicly viewable with the following limitations: The Chair shall appoint, and may replace at any time, a moderator who will pre-screen and exclude any email with the word "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line or which quotes or references or copies any other email with the word "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line. Furthermore, any such email shall not be transmitted to anyone who is not a member of the LNC-Discuss list without the explicit approval of that email's author.<br>
<br>[Proviso: This section replaces any previous motions on the subject of making public the LNC-Discuss emails.]<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br><br>Alicia Mattson<br>LNC Secretary<br></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><font size="1"><i>"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works.<font><b> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key to science.</b></font> It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”</i> -- Richard Feynman</font><br>
</div>
</div>