<div dir="ltr">For reference, here is the request I am referencing:<div><br></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">I am seeking co-requesters for a teleconference meeting to be held Saturday, September 24, 2016, at 5PM Pacific - 7PM Pacific. I am happy to adjust date and time if needed; I'm basing this off my memory and Caryn's assistance.</span><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">The agenda items would be as follows:</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">Populating Committees</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">Transparency for Committees</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">The items would be in that order, and there would be, I hope, a 2 hour hard stop. (According to some recent research, a 72 minute hard stop would be better, but that's not realistic.) </div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">It is my belief that these items, particularly the budget item, can be dealt with fairly easily at such a meeting if we do the spadework here, and might possibly be questions that come out differently at such a meeting vs. email. In other words, I think they would profit from real-time discussion and deliberation. </div></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">Furthermore, there was a request to assign times to items. My proposal is below. None of these are intended as special orders; rather, I include the times simply to indicate the time to be allocated to each item.</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">5:00 - 5:05 Pacific: Credentialing and housekeeping</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">5:05 - 6:05: Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">6:05 - 6:25: Populating Committees</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">6:25 - 6:45: Transparency for Committees</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">6:45 - 7:00: Public comment and announcements</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">It is my hope that less time will be needed than this and that we'll end early. </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Joshua A. Katz<div>Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Joshua Katz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:planning4liberty@gmail.com" target="_blank">planning4liberty@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">There were 6 votes cast. There were no dates receiving 6 votes, but the 25th (Sunday) had 5 votes, which was the most. Therefore, I am still seeking co-requesters for the 25th. <div><br clear="all"><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Joshua A. Katz<div>Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)</div></div></div></div>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>