<div dir="ltr">If Weld and Johnson have not yet signed the contract, would the campaign be open to a revision<div>of that clause to some extent? It would solve a whole lot of current problems.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Sam Goldstein<div>Libertarian National Committee</div><div>Member at Large</div><div>8925 N Meridian St, Ste 101</div><div>Indianapolis IN 46260</div><div>317-850-0726 Phone</div><div>317-582-1773 Fax</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nicholas Sarwark <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chair@lp.org" target="_blank">chair@lp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This reading:<br>
<span class="">"Mr. Goldstein directed me to a particular provision that I believe<br>
requires the LNC to keep the terms of the contract confidential.<br>
<br>
I don't believe that precludes us from putting the same or similar<br>
provisions in a sample contract for future campaigns, but it may make<br>
it so that we are not able to disclose the exact terms of this<br>
contract even after the election."<br>
<br>
</span>It does require and it does survive after the election.<br>
<br>
-Nick<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Daniel Hayes <<a href="mailto:danielehayes@icloud.com">danielehayes@icloud.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Which reading below?<br>
><br>
> Daniel Hayes<br>
> LNC At Large Member<br>
><br>
> Sent from my iPhone<br>
><br>
>> On Sep 19, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <<a href="mailto:nsarwark@gmail.com">nsarwark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> After discussing it with Mr. Hall, my reading below is correct.<br>
>><br>
>> -Nick<br>
>><br>
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <<a href="mailto:nsarwark@gmail.com">nsarwark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Mr. Goldstein directed me to a particular provision that I believe requires<br>
>>> the LNC to keep the terms of the contract confidential.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I don't believe that precludes us from putting the same or similar<br>
>>> provisions in a sample contract for future campaigns, but it may make it so<br>
>>> that we are not able to disclose the exact terms of this contract even after<br>
>>> the election.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I've asked Mr. Hall to double-check that language.<br>
>>><br>
>>> -Nick<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Sep 17, 2016, at 12:39 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> That goes beyond the authority granted in Orlando and should be a decision<br>
>>> of the entire LNC in executive session.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>> On Saturday, September 17, 2016, Nicholas J. Sarwark <<a href="mailto:chair@lp.org">chair@lp.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The LNC keeping it confidential is not a provision of the contract. It is<br>
>>>> my choice based on the advice of our attorney.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Please feel free to act accordingly.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> -Nick<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Sep 17, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Everyone and Mr. Chair:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I think this question needs to be answered before anyone can meaningfully<br>
>>>> sign this NDA.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Was secrecy until Inauguration Day part of the contract? If so, I will<br>
>>>> sign. We gave the Chair authority to negotiate the contract, and binding the<br>
>>>> LNC to secrecy is arguably something he could do, though I am willing to<br>
>>>> hear arguments to the contrary.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> If secrecy was NOT part of this contract, I do not believe there is<br>
>>>> authority for the Chair to, without a vote of the LNC, force us to keep this<br>
>>>> secret.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I need an answer to this question, even if the answer is "I'm not going to<br>
>>>> tell you" before I can make a meaningful decision on this NDA.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Starchild, I co-sponsor your motion.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> You articulated well misgivings I have in this whole thing. I *never*<br>
>>>>> agreed at that Orlando meeting that this contract would be secret after<br>
>>>>> signing. That was *not* part of the vote. I feel completely hoodwinked by<br>
>>>>> this and feel it is completely unilateral and improper.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Now perhaps this secrecy was part of the contract - *I have to pass it to<br>
>>>>> see what is in it apparently.* Ironic.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I am still deciding whether to sign and any modifications I will make to<br>
>>>>> this adhesion contract. But it is under objection and protest.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I had no issue agreeing to keep confidential until signed. I believe<br>
>>>>> that was part of our Orlando vote. I do not believe this further condition<br>
>>>>> was part of our vote - and if it was part of the negotiations - well bad on<br>
>>>>> us for ceding that power.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I will not make such a mistake again.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> As is my practice - I will confer with members of my region about this<br>
>>>>> matter and whether I should sign or stick to my guns. I likely will sign<br>
>>>>> because without signing I don't even know what my guns are. How very old<br>
>>>>> party of us.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Saturday, September 17, 2016, Starchild <<a href="mailto:sfdreamer@earthlink.net">sfdreamer@earthlink.net</a>><br>
>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Caryn, I share your concerns, and – Sam is correct – I have refused to<br>
>>>>>> sign any blanket non-disclosure agreement. The Bylaws setting forth our job<br>
>>>>>> descriptions do not contain any such requirement, and that being the case, I<br>
>>>>>> believe information relevant to doing our jobs must be made available to us<br>
>>>>>> without any further conditions except those which the LNC may vote to impose<br>
>>>>>> upon itself in accord with Article 7, Section 1:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> "The National Committee shall adopt rules of procedure for the conduct<br>
>>>>>> of its meetings and the carrying out of its duties and responsibilities."<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Nick wrote,<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As members of the LNC, you are entitled to review the agreements<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you will agree to keep them confidential.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> That statement doesn't say anything about being required to sign a<br>
>>>>>> blanket NDA covering our entire tenure on the LNC, and I hope Nick meant no<br>
>>>>>> more than what he said. I think we have every right as representatives to<br>
>>>>>> view documents that the LNC has voted to keep secret if we agree to keep<br>
>>>>>> them confidential on a case-by-case basis, rather than put our signatures to<br>
>>>>>> some all-encompassing legal gobbledy-gook that even a paralegal like<br>
>>>>>> yourself can't readily understand.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> In this case however, the LNC has not yet voted to keep the contract<br>
>>>>>> with the Johnson campaign secret. If it is deemed necessary to keep an<br>
>>>>>> official party document secret, I believe that decision should be made by<br>
>>>>>> the LNC as a whole. I don't think we want documents being essentially marked<br>
>>>>>> as "classified" by any one member of the committee, even the chair, without<br>
>>>>>> the consent of the body.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> What it comes down to is this: Transparency and openness should always<br>
>>>>>> be the default. When secrecy is desired, it should require a vote. That is<br>
>>>>>> our practice when going into a secret meeting, and I believe it should be<br>
>>>>>> our practice in other cases as well. With this principle in mind, I make the<br>
>>>>>> following motion, for which I seek co-sponsors:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> ------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>-------------<br>
>>>>>> Moved, that the National Party Agreement and Joint Fundraising Agreement<br>
>>>>>> documents signed by the LNC chair with the Johnson campaign not be disclosed<br>
>>>>>> beyond members of the LNC and staff who have agreed to this confidentiality<br>
>>>>>> until January 21, 2017, at which time the documents will become public<br>
>>>>>> unless the LNC votes prior to that date to extend the term of secrecy for<br>
>>>>>> some additional period of time.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> ------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>-------------<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> To be clear, I am making this motion only because I believe this matter<br>
>>>>>> requires an LNC vote, not because I want this secrecy. While I am willing to<br>
>>>>>> listen to arguments for why the documents should be kept secret until after<br>
>>>>>> the campaign is over – the day after Inauguration Day is actually well past<br>
>>>>>> when presidential campaigns are generally over, but I used Nick's referenced<br>
>>>>>> date for the language of the motion – my own inclination is to vote against<br>
>>>>>> my motion and allow the information to be shared immediately.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> As with all that we do as a party, we have an opportunity here to model<br>
>>>>>> a better way of doing things and thereby set a positive example. I'd like to<br>
>>>>>> see the contract, assuming one exists, between the Democratic Party and<br>
>>>>>> Hillary Clinton, or the Republican Party and Donald Trump, wouldn't you?<br>
>>>>>> Were such contracts routinely made public, I believe the result would be<br>
>>>>>> politicians and party leaders being held more accountable. Why would we not<br>
>>>>>> want to be part of the solution by making it more routine? Libertarians<br>
>>>>>> seeking to advance freedom have every reason to welcome transparency and<br>
>>>>>> accountability, but the same cannot be said for their corrupt and<br>
>>>>>> power-hungry cartel-party rivals! A culture of transparency isn't just<br>
>>>>>> better in terms of being more compatible with a free society – it gives us<br>
>>>>>> as a party a competitive advantage over the establishment parties and their<br>
>>>>>> back-room deal-making which cannot stand the light of day.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Love & Liberty,<br>
>>>>>> ((( starchild )))<br>
>>>>>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee<br>
>>>>>> (415) 625-FREE<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Yes that one. It does not say anywhere I could speak with you for<br>
>>>>>> instance... and will there be a record of who signed it? The levels of<br>
>>>>>> security and destruction of documents are not specficied Can we discuss over<br>
>>>>>> FB messenger? There is no ending date. It was sent to me with purpose<br>
>>>>>> blank.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I am not going to waste any further time arguing over it. I will sign<br>
>>>>>> it because I owe it to represent my Region - if it was just me affected I<br>
>>>>>> would refuse. I am noting my protest to this adhesion contract.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>
>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>
>>>>>> Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Sam Goldstein<br>
>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:goldsteinatlarge@gmail.com">goldsteinatlarge@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> This one? What specifically?<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Sam<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein<br>
>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee<br>
>>>>>>> Member at Large<br>
>>>>>>> 8925 N Meridian St, Ste 101<br>
>>>>>>> Indianapolis IN 46260<br>
>>>>>>> <a href="tel:317-850-0726" value="+13178500726">317-850-0726</a> Phone<br>
>>>>>>> <a href="tel:317-582-1773" value="+13175821773">317-582-1773</a> Fax<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Sam, I am a paralegal. I don't take contracts lightly, and I have a<br>
>>>>>>>> huge problem with this NDA. It is NOT a standard NDA as far as I can see.<br>
>>>>>>>> It doesn't say what you say. I have signed a pretty basic NDA with LPCO.<br>
>>>>>>>> This goes beyond that.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>
>>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>
>>>>>>>> Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Sam Goldstein<br>
>>>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:goldsteinatlarge@gmail.com">goldsteinatlarge@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Caryn,<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> I'm fairly sure all members of the LNC during my terms on the<br>
>>>>>>>>> commitee have signed this agreement, excepting perhaps Starchild, and I<br>
>>>>>>>>> don't think I ever heard of any problems or repercussions. Pretty much just<br>
>>>>>>>>> don't discuss with anyone who has not signed it or relay any item identified<br>
>>>>>>>>> as Confidential so that a non-signed can access it.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> From my memory for the past 3 terms, the only items labeled as<br>
>>>>>>>>> Confidential have been legal matters, part of the budget related to employee<br>
>>>>>>>>> contracts, salaries and bonuses and sensitive parts of the annual audit.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Feel free to contact me to discuss in more detail if you like.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Live Free,<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein<br>
>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee<br>
>>>>>>>>> Member at Large<br>
>>>>>>>>> 8925 N Meridian St, Ste 101<br>
>>>>>>>>> Indianapolis IN 46260<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="tel:317-850-0726" value="+13178500726">317-850-0726</a> Phone<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="tel:317-582-1773" value="+13175821773">317-582-1773</a> Fax<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> I am a paralegal and am having issues understanding the obligations<br>
>>>>>>>>>> of this NDA, it is completely unreasonable.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> So can we discuss with other LNC members? Only ones who have<br>
>>>>>>>>>> signed? Will those who have signed be public knowledge?<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Precisely how secure does my computer need to be? Do I need to put<br>
>>>>>>>>>> a certain level of passwords?<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> What level of destruction is required if I print it out and read?<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> It was sent to me with "stated purpose" blank. It has no ending<br>
>>>>>>>>>> date.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Seriously?<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well apparently we have to sign a multi-page NDA to even view it.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have given my word, and I have never broke confidentiality. I would think<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> we have a right as LNC members to see it without having to consult with an<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> attorney. Little did I know when I voted in Orlando. Live and learn.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Joshua Katz<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:planning4liberty@gmail.com">planning4liberty@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Chairman - thank you for your hard work and persistence on<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> this endeavor. I am glad it has finally been concluded, and, although I<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't yet sent my request, I have full confidence that you would not have<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> executed an agreement that was not in our interests. Congratulations.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that keeping it confidential until Inauguration Day is,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> among other things, a very reasonably optimistic action.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joshua A. Katz<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <<a href="mailto:chair@lp.org">chair@lp.org</a>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear All,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have agreed on a contract with the Johnson Campaign and a<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> joint<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundraising agreement. My copies have been signed and the<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Governors<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will sign theirs shortly.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the advice of counsel, I will be keeping the agreements<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidential until at least after inauguration day.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As members of the LNC, you are entitled to review the agreements<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you will agree to keep them confidential. If you would like to<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do so,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> please email Robert Kraus with your request and he can send them<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yours in liberty,<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nick<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
>>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> In Liberty,<br>
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>
>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>
>>> Harlos@LP.org<br>
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
>><br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Lnc-business mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>