<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Surely I'm not the only one who sees the irony of someone using an unsigned email from an anonymously-structured email address to lobby the LNC for transparency. Just sayin'...<br><br></div>We have also recently been lobbied to suspend our presidential ticket by a person who later noted he's not even a member of the LP. For all I know, some of these emails could be coming from Trump or Clinton supporters.<br><br></div>-Alicia<br><br><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Audacious Caucus <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:beaudaciouslp@gmail.com" target="_blank">beaudaciouslp@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">To the members of the Libertarian National Committee,</p>
<p dir="ltr">We the members of the Libertarian Party Audacious Caucus (LPAC) wish to express our support for the motion to rescind put forth by LNC Region 1 Representative Caryn Ann Harlos. This motion is a call for transparency in light of some troubling aspects of the contract Chairman Sarwark was authorized to negotiate and sign. We feel this is a play at opacity that is not acceptable. There can be an argument made for tactical aspects of keeping the contract hidden during the campaign, but after it is over, members of the LNC should be able to discuss it with their constituents, and members should be able to view the document as the information can be useful in deciding on LNC representatives, or as a benchmark if the bylaw provision for a stock contract comes back around.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We hope that you will choose wisely and support the rescission, not as a personal attack on the Chair, but as a support of transparency to set an example for the old parties.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thank you,</p>
<p dir="ltr">The Members of The Libertarian Party Audacious Caucus.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Be Audacious!</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div>