<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p> </p>
<div>Here are the links from BAN on the KY ballot access case. Unfortunately, we received word today that the petition to have it re-heard en banc was rejected by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. I still think it would be wise for the LNC to hold an Executive Session meeting with Chris Wiest and Oliver Hall to have questions answered.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Case filed in federal court: </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/04/15/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-reply-brief-in-ballot-access-case/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/04/15/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-reply-brief-in-ballot-access-case/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Oral arguments:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/05/11/u-s-district-court-sets-may-19-oral-argument-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/05/11/u-s-district-court-sets-may-19-oral-argument-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>District upholds definition:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/08/u-s-district-court-upholds-kentuckys-definition-of-a-qualified-political-party/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/08/u-s-district-court-upholds-kentuckys-definition-of-a-qualified-political-party/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>Case expedited:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/14/sixth-circuit-expedites-kentucky-ballot-access-case/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/14/sixth-circuit-expedites-kentucky-ballot-access-case/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Filing of a brief in case:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/22/libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-brief-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/22/libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-brief-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>Appeal to 6th Circuit:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/26/sixth-circuit-upholds-kentuckys-failure-to-have-a-procedure-for-an-unqualified-party-to-become-a-qualified-party-in-advance-of-any-particular-election/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/26/sixth-circuit-upholds-kentuckys-failure-to-have-a-procedure-for-an-unqualified-party-to-become-a-qualified-party-in-advance-of-any-particular-election/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Filing for re-hearing en banc:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://ballot-access.org/2016/09/07/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-ask-for-rehearing-in-case-on-definition-of-political-party/">http://ballot-access.org/2016/09/07/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-ask-for-rehearing-in-case-on-definition-of-political-party/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>---<br />
<p>Ken C. Moellman, Jr.<br />LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative<br />LPKY Judicial Committee</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>On 2016-09-25 15:50, Alicia Mattson wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I'm going to want more information on this before I vote. Sometimes there are quite strategic considerations to whether or not a particular case should be appealed, and those things should not be discussed in front of Democrats and Republicans on a public list.<br /><br /></div>
I checked Ballot Access News and didn't see this case in the first three pages of articles. Can someone post the link where I can get a little more detail so I'm not voting in the dark?<br /><br /></div>
-Alicia<br /><br />
<div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br />
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alicia Mattson <span><<a href="mailto:agmattson@gmail.com">agmattson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br />
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 .8ex; border-left: 1px #ccc solid; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>We have an electronic mail ballot.</div>
<br /><strong><u>Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by October 5, 2016 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.<br /></u></strong> <br /><u>Co-Sponsors:</u> Katz, Harlos, Redpath, Hayes<br /> <br /><u>Motion:</u> The LNC will allocate from Legal Offense $2000 to fund a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court in the Kentucky Ballot Access case.<span class="HOEnZb"><span style="color: #888888;"><br /><br /><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><span style="color: #888888;">-Alicia<br /><br /></span></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">_______________________________________________<br /> Lnc-business mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br /> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a></div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>