<div dir="ltr"><div>Joshua,<br><br>Just say it was an incomplete edit. You were gonna write "RONR provides no guidance because it's a terrible idea that RONR advises against doing at all," but then you edited the sentence so that the contraction no longer belonged, and you merely forgot to finish the edit. :-)<br><br></div>-Alicia<br><div><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Joshua Katz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:planning4liberty@gmail.com" target="_blank">planning4liberty@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">My god, what have I done? <Its></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail-m_-7685491205726420322gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Joshua A. Katz<div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div class="gmail-h5">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Joshua Katz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:planning4liberty@gmail.com" target="_blank">planning4liberty@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">RONR provides no guidance because it's general advice is that, if you decide to use email voting, you are on your own. Our own rules, though, are clear. A vote closes after 10 days OR when all LNC members, not including alternates, have cast a vote. If we want to expedite the process, everyone needs to vote quickly. It would be improper to take action when even a majority of the full LNC has cast "yes" votes because votes may be changed until the vote closes (and for the more obvious but less practical reason that, until it closes, nothing has been decided).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail-m_-7685491205726420322m_8768734347463203622gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Joshua A. Katz<div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div class="gmail-m_-7685491205726420322h5">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:54 PM, David Demarest <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dpdemarest@centurylink.net" target="_blank">dpdemarest@centurylink.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US"><div class="gmail-m_-7685491205726420322m_8768734347463203622m_-2441379183415898696WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif;color:rgb(0,112,192);background:aqua none repeat scroll 0% 0%">Nick</span></u><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">, <u><span style="background:aqua none repeat scroll 0% 0%">Alicia</span></u>:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">To Tim’s point, the election is a mere 16 days away. If we start the email ballot tonight, the full 10-day email ballot process would leave only 6 days left before the election. Would that be sufficient for Mr. Wickes to take full advantage of our $5,000? Or should we consider either Johnny/Jill-on-the-spot with all our votes or taking action immediately after the required number of Yes votes has been received?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif;background:aqua none repeat scroll 0% 0%">Joshua</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">, <u><span style="background:aqua none repeat scroll 0% 0%">Aaron</span></u>: What guidance does RONR provide on the latter question?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">Assuming all 17 votes would be cast, what would be the number of Yes votes required to pass this motion?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">I will be voting Yes on this motion as soon as it is opened for voting.<u></u><u></u></span></p><span><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">Thoughts?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:20pt;font-family:"script mt bold"">~David<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Dec 28-Jan 1 Omaha Roads to Liberty Un-Convention<u></u><u></u></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">~David Pratt Demarest<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">LNC Region 6 Representative (IA, IL, MN, MO, ND, NE, WI)<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">Secretary, LPNE State Central Committee<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">Cell: <a href="tel:%28402%29%20981-6469" value="+14029816469" target="_blank">402-981-6469</a><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">Home: <a href="tel:%28402%29%20493-0873" value="+14024930873" target="_blank">402-493-0873</a><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></span><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"calibri",sans-serif"> Lnc-business [mailto:<a href="mailto:lnc-business-bounces@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">lnc-business-bounces@h<wbr>q.lp.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Caryn Ann Harlos<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 09, 2017 9:42 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><span><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Lnc-business] Request for assistance from Mark Wicks<u></u><u></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">Nick would that be the language?<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div class="gmail-m_-7685491205726420322m_8768734347463203622h5"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:19 PM Nicholas Sarwark <<a href="mailto:chair@lp.org" target="_blank">chair@lp.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><blockquote style="border-width:medium medium medium 1pt;border-style:none none none solid;border-color:currentcolor currentcolor currentcolor rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in"><p class="MsoNormal">I will sponsor a motion for the LNC to contribute $5,000 to the Mark<br>Wicks for Congress campaign.<br><br>Our counsel and many others worked very hard to make sure Mr. Wicks<br>could be in the televised debate (that he did very well in), I think<br>it would be good to follow through and this is a very reasonable<br>request after the candidate (a) raised a similar amount of money and<br>(b) put in a similar amount of money on his own.<br><br>-Nick<br><br>On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br><<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com" target="_blank">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> I will get the appropriate links and commentary about the debate from Mr.<br>> Wicks.<br>><br>> -Caryn Ann<br>><br>> So we have myself and Joshua willing to co-sponsor a motion for $5,000. We<br>> would need two more.<br>><br>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Joshua Katz <<a href="mailto:planning4liberty@gmail.com" target="_blank">planning4liberty@gmail.com</a>><br>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> I take that to mean that there is no ballot access retention based on this<br>>> race. It might be true that better voter numbers than we have ever seen<br>>> before makes a difference for us, perhaps even a national-scale difference<br>>> (which is what it takes, short of ballot access, in my eyes, to invest<br>>> national money). What I'm less sure of, though, is that investing money<br>>> into this campaign will achieve that. Is the debate video available<br>>> somewhere, or commentary saying he won the debate? That makes a difference,<br>>> and I can certainly see the value of $5,000 to amplify that if it is<br>>> credible and exists.<br>>><br>>> I also note that, while it's a 3-way race, the Democrat doesn't strike me<br>>> as particularly serious, which could be an opportunity. I don't think<br>>> either of those candidates has been able to demonstrate that they care, and<br>>> if Wicks can do that, if he had debate moments like Bill Clinton's answer on<br>>> the national debt in that town hall debate, and we can make an ad with a 5<br>>> second clip like that, I'm sold.<br>>><br>>> I'm less excited about the fact that this is an at-large Congressional<br>>> seat. Yes, online ads have the greatest reach, but don't across to most as<br>>> being as credible, and there's no other real way for him, with his budget,<br>>> to reach across the state.<br>>><br>>> He is right that $5,000 is a small amount to invest. I don't like<br>>> investing small amounts. As I argued at the last meeting about the<br>>> consultants, people tell you what they are worth. Someone pricing<br>>> themselves well below market is telling you something. Wicks is not pricing<br>>> himself low, but I'm not convinced that $5,000 can do anything for him. It<br>>> can get him an online ad, but I'm not sure it can get enough impressions to<br>>> get people talking. So let me ask against - what is the maximum we can<br>>> give? Also, if we gave more than $5,000, does he have the campaign<br>>> infrastructure to use it effectively? I'm more interested in spending money<br>>> where it can do good than in minimizing the money spent in a given place.<br>>><br>>> I like that the ask is for less than he's raised. I'm less thrilled that,<br>>> with the full ask, he'd have $11,600 for a statewide Congressional race.<br>>> I'm not concerned about that because it's not enough to win - I'm concerned<br>>> about that because I don't know that it's enough to be heard outside of a<br>>> small echo chamber.<br>>><br>>> He has a very nice website. It looks good, it draws you in, it's fairly<br>>> interactive, and it focuses on applying our ideas in ways that matter to<br>>> Montanans. On the other hand, with $6k raised, he didn't use a professional<br>>> photographer, I think, for his photos. He looks much better in his tv shots<br>>> than in his own pictures.<br>>><br>>> Bernie Sanders is campaigning for the Democrat (like I said, not serious)<br>>> while Trump and Pence are both campaigning for the Republican. The<br>>> Republicans, between party and PACs, are spending $1,600,000. Democrats are<br>>> spending somewhere in the 6 digits. I don't think $11,600 is enough to have<br>>> a voice, but $20,000 might be, if used correctly. This is a unique<br>>> opportunity and a strong race. We've already put national firepower into<br>>> getting him into the debate. I would like to see us give more, and<br>>> accompany it with a national staffer acting as campaign adviser to improve a<br>>> few of the nuts and bolts and making sure the amplification works out well.<br>>> In the meantime, I will cosponsor a motion to give $5,000. I will not<br>>> cosponsor a motion to give $2,500.<br>>><br>>> On the bigger picture: I agree that we need a better structure than having<br>>> this board make such decisions on the basis of limited information, without<br>>> much time to research. I had wanted to come up with such a structure, but<br>>> life has gotten in the way, both for me and for the LNC. I also acknowledge<br>>> that our budget is in a deficit - but our budget does include a line for<br>>> candidates and campaigns, and only half of that line has been allocated, so<br>>> we've already put aside money for this (in a sense). Furthermore, our cash<br>>> position is entirely the result of our own decisions. I don't think we can<br>>> make ourselves cash-poor, write a budget that shows a deficit (which I<br>>> didn't vote for, for that reason among others), and then use that as a<br>>> reason that we cannot help our candidates who can, in fact, make a<br>>> difference and help grow this party - growth that will, hopefully, close<br>>> that gap next year. Last year, we took in quite a bit more than we budgeted<br>>> for - in large part based on the attention our national ticket was getting,<br>>> and in large part because, I think, people wanted us to support key races.<br>>> Is this a key race? I think it is, given the timing, the lack of a serious<br>>> Democrat, the spending imbalance between the Rs and Ds, and so on, but<br>>> that's for each of us to decide. Our candidate has also not just gotten<br>>> into a debate, but shown that he knows what he's doing once there, and in<br>>> the process gotten himself useful soundbites for an ad campaign (I'm<br>>> assuming affirmative answers to my questions above).<br>>><br>>> Joshua A. Katz<br>>><br>>><br>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com" target="_blank">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> Mark Wicks provided these responses and apologized that he is not as<br>>>> eloquent as possible as he was calling from the campaign trail:<br>>>><br>>>> "I think this is being looked at the wrong way. Both parties are looking<br>>>> for a win to prove their agenda is supported by the American people. We need<br>>>> to show that both parties are being rejected. A win cements that but we also<br>>>> win with better voter numbers than we have ever seen before. It gives<br>>>> legitimacy, and that helps all of us. It sets me up for 2018 and other<br>>>> candidates as well. We can't raise money without some measure of success.<br>>>> $5000 is a small investment into a campaign that will pay dividends for all<br>>>> candidates. We won a battle getting into the debate, I won the debate, now<br>>>> we are positioning pieces for the next war and trying to inflict as much<br>>>> damage as possible in this one."<br>>>><br>>>> -Caryn Ann<br>>>><br>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com" target="_blank">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>>>><br>>>>> Alicia, yes, and running strong campaigns.<br>>>>><br>>>>> -Caryn Ann<br>>>>><br>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Alicia Mattson <<a href="mailto:agmattson@gmail.com" target="_blank">agmattson@gmail.com</a>><br>>>>> wrote:<br>>>>>><br>>>>>> Also, is this looking to be a 3-way race with both the Democrats and<br>>>>>> Republicans running candidates?<br>>>>>><br>>>>>> -Alicia<br>>>>>><br>>>>>><br>>>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>>>>> <<a href="mailto:carynannharlos@gmail.com" target="_blank">carynannharlos@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> On behalf of Montana candidate Mark Wicks running for the vacated seat<br>>>>>>> by the appointment of Zinke, he is requesting the LNC assist his campaign<br>>>>>>> financially.<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> I had let him know specific information we would need, and would like<br>>>>>>> to share that information:<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> I know you asked for a budget for how I will spend the money and with<br>>>>>>> time constraints and getting the word out online media seems to be the way<br>>>>>>> to go. We have ads that are being readied and ready to go anytime. Flathead<br>>>>>>> county is having a Liberty Bash combined with a send the work truck event.<br>>>>>>> We can get a live remote and good online adds for $2500. That will cover the<br>>>>>>> valley really well. The east side of the state is taken care of and all the<br>>>>>>> big towns are covered except Great Falls. I can use as much as the LP can<br>>>>>>> send, but I think $5000 would make a good impact. We have received $3600,<br>>>>>>> plus I have put in about $3000 total. I can't give any measure of impact.<br>>>>>>> People are really searching for a third choice so even minimal presentation<br>>>>>>> will go a long ways.<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> If any LNC member is interested in co-sponsoring a motion to assist in<br>>>>>>> any amount please let me know so we can craft.<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> --<br>>>>>>> In Liberty,<br>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>>>>>>> Caryn.Ann. <a href="mailto:Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Harlos@LP.org</a><br>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:<br>>>>>>> We defend your rights<br>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force<br>>>>>>> Taxation is theft<br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>>>>>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>>>>>>><br>>>>>><br>>>>>><br>>>>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>>>>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>> --<br>>>>> In Liberty,<br>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,<br>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -<br>>>>> Caryn.Ann. <a href="mailto:Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Harlos@LP.org</a><br>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee<br>>>>><br>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:<br>>>>> We defend your rights<br>>>>> And oppose the use of force<br>>>>> Taxation is theft<br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> --<br>>>> In Liberty,<br>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>>>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>>>> <a href="mailto:Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Harlos@LP.org</a><br>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee<br>>>><br>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:<br>>>> We defend your rights<br>>>> And oppose the use of force<br>>>> Taxation is theft<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>>><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> In Liberty,<br>> Caryn Ann Harlos<br>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,<br>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.<br>> <a href="mailto:Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Harlos@LP.org</a><br>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado<br>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus<br>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee<br>><br>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:<br>> We defend your rights<br>> And oppose the use of force<br>> Taxation is theft<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>> Lnc-business mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>><br><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>Lnc-business mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br><a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">-- <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"arial",sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,102)">In Liberty,</span></b><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"arial",sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,102)">Caryn Ann Harlos</span></b><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:7.5pt">Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee </span><span style="font-size:10pt">(Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - <a href="mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org</a></span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Communications Director, <a href="http://www.lpcolorado.org" target="_blank">Libertarian Party of Colorado</a></span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Colorado State Coordinator, <a href="http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org" target="_blank">Libertarian Party Radical Caucus</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee</span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">A haiku to the Statement of Principles:</span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10pt">We defend your rights</span></i><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10pt">And oppose the use of force</span></i><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10pt">Taxation is theft</span></i><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.<wbr>org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>