<div dir="ltr">How is one per state = 100?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org" target="_blank">elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think expanding to one representative per state, for a total of 100 members, would be a plus.  (I know that's not what the bylaws people want.)<br>
<br>
Because, it would be easier to get feedback from the members.  The actual people we represent.<br>
<br>
Then some posting rules could be in place, such as no burdening the rest of the LNC with personal rambles and dreams.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Elizabeth Van Horn<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 2018-01-15 00:17, <a href="mailto:david.demarest@lp.org" target="_blank">david.demarest@lp.org</a> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Can you imagine the length of this bruhaha email chain if the bylaws<br>
committee proposal to expand the the LNC to 134 members was already in<br>
place. It boggles the imagination.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/lnc-business</a><br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/lnc-business</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>