<div dir="ltr">LOL yes.  So it would go to the not-transparent-controlled-by-large-states EC.  Just like I said it would.<div><br></div><div>Would Montana and Wyoming have a voice in that as they do now?</div><div><br></div><div>The answer is no.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:17 PM,  <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david.demarest@lp.org" target="_blank">david.demarest@lp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Can you imagine the length of this bruhaha email chain if the bylaws committee proposal to expand the the LNC to 134 members was already in place. It boggles the imagination.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/lnc-business</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>