<div dir="auto">E-mail chains would still be 100+....with 50 alternates in place.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 14, 2018 11:39 PM, "Elizabeth Van Horn" <<a href="mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org">elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif">
<p>*laughing out loud!*    I meant 50 one per state.  See?  It's even better!   </p>
<div>---<br>
<div class="m_6692147487232835396pre" style="margin:0;padding:0;font-family:monospace">Elizabeth Van Horn<br><br></div>
</div>
<p><br></p>
<p>On 2018-01-15 00:37, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding:0 0.4em;border-left:#1010ff 2px solid;margin:0">
<div dir="ltr">How is one per state = 100?</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn <span><<a href="mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org" target="_blank">elizabeth.vanhorn@lp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think expanding to one representative per state, for a total of 100 members, would be a plus.  (I know that's not what the bylaws people want.)<br> <br> Because, it would be easier to get feedback from the members.  The actual people we represent.<br> <br> Then some posting rules could be in place, such as no burdening the rest of the LNC with personal rambles and dreams.<br> <br> <br> <br> ---<br> Elizabeth Van Horn
<div class="m_6692147487232835396HOEnZb">
<div class="m_6692147487232835396h5"><br> <br> <br> On 2018-01-15 00:17, <a href="mailto:david.demarest@lp.org" target="_blank">david.demarest@lp.org</a> wrote:<br> <br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Can you imagine the length of this bruhaha email chain if the bylaws<br> committee proposal to expand the the LNC to 134 members was already in<br> place. It boggles the imagination.<br> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Lnc-business mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/lnc-business</a></blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Lnc-business mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/lnc-business</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="m_6692147487232835396pre" style="margin:0;padding:0;font-family:monospace">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Lnc-business mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br> <a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/lnc-business</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lnc-business mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lnc-business@hq.lp.org">Lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a><br>
<a href="http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/lnc-business</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>