<div><div dir="auto">Considering the very large deficit budget, being at break-even is quite an accomplishment and I would think should be the basic idea behind any budget (if put-asides for needed reserves or other upcoming special expenses are part of the budget).</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">It is my recollection in December (and we can go back to the recording) that the new staff was not fully funded and that a budget line shift such as this was anticipated and would be the time we could re-evaluate those programs if needed (which is what Alicia is doing).</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Here is where having more detail in the minutes would be helpful - here is a link to the minutes where the reasons behind some of the decisions can be inferred:</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div><a href="https://www.lp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2017-12-09_LNC_Minutes_Final.pdf">https://www.lp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2017-12-09_LNC_Minutes_Final.pdf</a></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If I have the time, I will try to find and post the exact links for the discussion on the video.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Often, the comments during the live blogging at IPR are also very helpful:</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div><a href="http://independentpoliticalreport.com/2017/12/live-blogging-the-libertarian-party-national-committee-meeting-december-9-10-2017/">http://independentpoliticalreport.com/2017/12/live-blogging-the-libertarian-party-national-committee-meeting-december-9-10-2017/</a></div><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-Caryn Ann</div><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:13 PM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business <<a href="mailto:lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>I'll not yet my vote until I get some additional information.<br><br>I'd like to remind my colleagues that budgets are just guesses written down on paper. With this motion, we're not just shuffling numbers around on paper, but we're also approving spending it for very specific purposes. Before we start shuffling budget numbers, we need to be looking at how actual performance is running versus budget projections.<br><br></div><div>Unless I've overlooked it, I don't think we've yet received June financial statements. It could be that the convention put that a little behind schedule. Since I was on the previous LNC, I have the end-of-month May 2018 financials which our newer members will not have seen. This will at least give you something, rather than nothing, to consult.<br><br></div><div>The budget adopted by the previous LNC for 2018 had a $350k deficit, essentially betting on revenues to come in higher than budget. Is that the case? So far this year, we're running $69k below budget on revenues, and that was a deficit budget. The cost of raising those revenues is running within $2k of budget. We're afloat because our program expenses are running $100k under budget. At the bottom line, we're running a $33k surplus so far this year.<br><br></div><div>Now we're planning to take $34k of budgeted expenses that we weren't going to spend at all, and we're going to spend them. This will wash out our surplus and put our actual performance (not budget) at break-even for the year.<br><br></div><div></div><div>I'd like to hear more about what exactly the spending plan is. Two things are listed in the motion:<br>1) cost of existing candidate recruitment and campaigns advisor support staff, and <br>2) to provide up to $20,000 for candidate field support expenses though the end of the budget year.<br><br></div><div>Parsing the words here, it says we've hired more staff than we budgeted for? This will be an ongoing expense, not just a one-time cost that will be fixed by this one shuffle. Can we have specifics of what the over-budget costs are?<br><br></div><div>For the candidate field support expenses, my guess is that this is perhaps intended to help incumbents such as Brandon Phinney and Laura Ebke. If so, I'm inclined to support, but I would like more details about whether that's the intent. Or are we planning to give token contributions to candidates in other situations?</div></div><div><div><br><br></div><div>-Alicia<br><br></div><div><br><br></div><div><br><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:08 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <span><<a href="mailto:lnc-business@hq.lp.org" target="_blank">lnc-business@hq.lp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Email Ballot 2018-20: AMEND BUDGET<br>
<br>
We have an electronic mail ballot.<br>
<br>
Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by AUGUST 10, 2018 at<br>
11:59:59pm Pacific time.<br>
<br>
Co-Sponsors: GOLDSTEIN, HARLOS, LONGSTRETH, O’DONNELL, PHILLIPS, VAN HORN<br>
<br>
Motion: Decrease the budget for line 70-Ballot Access VR & Related Exp<br>
by $34,400 from $250,000 to $216,600 (a $34,400 decrease) and increase<br>
the budget for line 60-Candidate, Campaign & Initiatives from $58,800<br>
to $92,200 (a $34,400 increase) to cover the cost of existing<br>
candidate recruitment and campaigns advisor support staff, and to<br>
provide up to $20,000 for candidate field support expenses though the<br>
end of the budget year.<br>
<br>
=============================================<br>
<br>
You can keep track of the Secretary's manual tally of votes here:<br>
<a href="https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting</a>. Votes are noted with a link to the<br>
actual ballot cast for verification. You can find the time that the<br>
manual tally was last updated at the bottom of the sheet.<br>
<br>
Please notify me of any discrepancies.<br>
<span class="m_2003146017130545711m_-6479365963040426100HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-- <br>
In Liberty,<br>
Caryn Ann Harlos<br>
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -<br>
Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org or Secretary@LP.org.<br>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia@LP.org<br>
<br>
<br>
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:<br>
We defend your rights<br>
And oppose the use of force<br>
Taxation is theft<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:small">-- </span><br style="font-size:small"><div style="font-size:small"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><font size="4" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#666666"><b>In Liberty,</b></font></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><font size="4" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#666666"><b>Caryn Ann Harlos</b></font></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="font-size:x-small">Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary - <a href="mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos@LP.org" target="_blank">Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org</a> or Secretary@LP.org.</span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="font-size:x-small">Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia@LP.org</span></div></div><div><span style="font-size:x-small"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:x-small">A haiku to the Statement of Principles:</span></div><div><span style="font-size:x-small"><i>We defend your rights</i></span></div><div><span style="font-size:x-small"><i>And oppose the use of force</i></span></div><div><span style="font-size:x-small"><i>Taxation is theft</i></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>