<div dir='auto'>I didn't see anyone opposing an investigation. I did see some people questioning what the correct path for investigation is, and whether that path included Mr Fishman, or should have been the chair and/or vice chair.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I myself pointed out that given recent events, that impartiality from some might be difficult and suggested Mr Merced and perhaps the EPCC would be the correct path.<br><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Mr Merced has been investigating, and responded with some of his findings in the off list discussion on the subject.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I would also point out that the chair has often of late taken up to a week to respond to things - this included, so creating an issue when someone has not responded to an email sent the same day seems a touch ... questionable.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If the motion becomes necessary after a reasonable amount of time, like 24-36 hours, then I would still suggest that the investigation be pursued by the people I mentioned above.</div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">John Phillips<br>Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative<br>Cell 217-412-5973</div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 22, 2020 1:28 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business <lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:<br type="attribution" /><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Or perhaps more appropriately, Mr. Moellman should send to you. You can
<br>
then do with it as you wish.
<br>
<br>
*In Liberty,*
<br>
<br>
* Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
<br>
(part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal
<br>
communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone
<br>
found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
<br>
pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:27 AM Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos@lp.org>
<br>
wrote:
<br>
<br>
> I will start that ballot after I get off work.
<br>
>
<br>
> For the record, you had not weighed in before. Now that you have, I
<br>
> believe Mr. Moellman should release the tape. Agree or not with your
<br>
> decision, you do have the authority to request release of the recording
<br>
> IMHO.
<br>
>
<br>
> *In Liberty,*
<br>
>
<br>
> * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome
<br>
> (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal
<br>
> communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone
<br>
> found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux
<br>
> pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *
<br>
>
<br>
>
<br>
>
<br>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:00 AM Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business <
<br>
> lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
<br>
>
<br>
>> Dear All,
<br>
>>
<br>
>> The Convention Oversight Committee met one week ago, on June 15 via Zoom.
<br>
>> Mr. Moellman arranged the Zoom meeting room and recorded the proceedings.
<br>
>> All LNC members were invited to attend the meeting, along with Libertarian
<br>
>> Party staff.
<br>
>>
<br>
>> Following the meeting, the Executive Director, Dan Fishman, made a request
<br>
>> to the Chair of the Convention Oversight Committee, BetteRose Ryan, for a
<br>
>> copy of the recording for his review, as he was not in attendance on June
<br>
>> 15. Ms. Ryan requested that Mr. Moellman provide the recording to Mr.
<br>
>> Fishman. Mr. Moellman did not provide the recording as directed by the
<br>
>> Chair of the Convention Oversight Committee, but instead asked other
<br>
>> members of the Convention Oversight Committee whether he should provide
<br>
>> the
<br>
>> recording. Members of that committee objected to providing the recording
<br>
>> and it was not provided.
<br>
>>
<br>
>> There are concerns that there was a Policy Manual violation during that
<br>
>> meeting, something the Executive Director is required to inform the Chair
<br>
>> of the LNC about and investigate in as confidential a manner as possible.
<br>
>> If Mr. Fishman had received the recording, it would allow for that
<br>
>> investigation to proceed appropriately. Without the recording,
<br>
>> investigating is much more difficult.
<br>
>>
<br>
>> Earlier today, I sent an email as Chair of the Libertarian National
<br>
>> Committee directing Mr. Moellman to send the recording to Mr. Fishman. Mr.
<br>
>> Moellman has not done so, nor responded to my email. My understanding is
<br>
>> that members of the Convention Oversight Committee would rather nobody be
<br>
>> able to review the recording and are claiming some right of
<br>
>> confidentiality
<br>
>> over its contents, though there is no legal, bylaws, or policy manual
<br>
>> authority that has been put forward that has been offered to support this
<br>
>> claim. Even if confidential contract information was discussed, the
<br>
>> Executive Director is privy to those details by virtue of his role.
<br>
>>
<br>
>> Since members of this LNC seem determined to prevent the investigation
<br>
>> from
<br>
>> going forward without action from the entire Libertarian National
<br>
>> Committee, I am asking the Secretary to distribute the following email
<br>
>> ballot:
<br>
>>
<br>
>> The Libertarian National Committee directs the Convention Oversight
<br>
>> Committee to provide the recording of the June 15, 2020 Convention
<br>
>> Oversight Committee meeting to the Executive Director for his review.
<br>
>>
<br>
>> Yours in liberty,
<br>
>> Nick
<br>
>>
<br>
>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div>