[Lnc-business] seeking co-sponsors for email ballot regarding Oregon

[Wes Benedict]

The LP Louisiana went through vicious infighting while I was there in 
2011. There were at least three factions. I think I actually managed to 
stay friendly with all three factions throughout the fighting, and I'm 
on speaking terms with all three factions today. I occasionally converse 
productively with them via email and phone.

I haven't figured out in my mind how to help resolve the Oregon 
situation or how I think it should be resolved. I just do what the chair 
at the time instructs me to do when it comes to Oregon (I've served 
under three chairs now during this Oregon dispute). Otherwise, I try to 
keep staff and myself out of it, and assume it could go on forever.

Nevertheless, against my better judgement, I'll offer the possibility 
that I'd be willing to make an attempt to have a productive conversation 
will all three factions in the Oregon dispute if all three factions want 
my help. I consider the three factions in this dispute to be the Wagner 
group, the Reeve's group, and the LNC. However, it would not be 
surprising to me if one, two, or even all three of those groups would 
rather see me go jump in the Potomac than wade into the Oregon dispute.

In any case, I do think it's sad to see so much fighting about this. 
Wish we could find a way to work together, or at least work 
separately--rather than work against each other.

Yours in liberty,

Wes Benedict, Executive Director
Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
*New address: 1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314*
(202) 333-0008 ext. 232, wes.benedict at lp.org
facebook.com/libertarians @LPNational
Join the Libertarian Party at: http://lp.org/membership

On 8/7/2014 5:48 PM, Alicia Mattson wrote:
> The Wagner group has been for a while essentially treated as the 
> affiliate by our staff due to administrative decisions, rather than 
> the past decisions of the LNC which were to recognize the Reeves group 
> and not the Wagner group.
>
> The only rationale I have heard for this is the Judicial Committee 
> ruling dated August 25, 2011.  I have already explained numerous ways 
> in which the JC ruling is inoperable.  Rather than repeat them all 
> again while the readers' eyes glaze over, I'll just emphasize that at 
> the very least it is inoperable because the Oregon SOS refuses to 
> accept the responsibility the JC attempted (without bylaw authority) 
> to delegate to them.  The JC said the SOS has to do it.  Then the SOS 
> said a judge has to do it.  The judge says the party has to do it, in 
> contradiction to the JC which said the party can't do it.  That's an 
> inoperable JC decision in the most basic sense of the word, without 
> even having to dig into longer debates about rules which I have 
> previously presented, which I believe also make the JC ruling null and 
> void.
>
> I am asking for co-sponsors for the following motion:
>
> ----------START OF MOTION----------
>
> WHEREAS, the national Libertarian Party's Judicial Committee ruling 
> dated August 25, 2011 is inoperable;
>
> RESOLVED, the Libertarian National Committee (LNC) Secretary is 
> directed to send a letter to the Oregon Secretary of State:
>
> 1) Asking her office to correct their records because after May 21, 
> 2011, the outgoing chair of the Libertarian Party of Oregon (Wes 
> Wagner) failed to notify them of the expiration of his term; and
>
> 2) Reminding her that the LNC has several times acknowledged the 
> legitimacy of the Tim Reeves group of officers who were selected on 
> May 21, 2011 to replace them (and by implication, any subsequent 
> successor officers);
>
> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the LNC hereby directs staff to update 
> their records to reflect that the Tim Reeves group of officers are - 
> and have been since May 21, 2011 - the leadership of the Libertarian 
> Party of Oregon and that they are entitled to the same rights and 
> privileges as that of any other affiliate, including being listed on 
> our party's website, subscribed to the state chairs' email list, and 
> sent monthly data files required by LNC policy.
>
> ----------END OF MOTION----------
>
>  -Alicia
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20140807/032563e8/attachment-0002.html>