[Lnc-business] seeking co-sponsors for email ballot regarding Oregon
SAM8074 at aol.com
SAM8074 at aol.com
Thu Aug 7 20:42:20 EDT 2014
I will oppose any and all efforts to get the LNC involved in the LP Ore
gon's internal matters. We have wasted enough of our time, energy and money
to no avail and there is no sense in stroking fires or egos any further.
I am especially opposed to any use of LNC staff to intervene in this
squabble and would also oppose any official LNC presence at any LP Oregon
convention during this term.
Let us proceed to work on the betterment of state affiliates that want our
help, build a war chest for the 2016 Presidential campaign and keep focused
on our effort to return the idea of Liberty to our country.
Live Free,
Sam Goldstein
At Large Representative
Libertarian National Committee
317-850-0726 Mobile
sam.goldstein at lp.org Email
In a message dated 8/7/2014 8:01:24 P.M. US Eastern Daylight Time,
wes.benedict at lp.org writes:
The LP Louisiana went through vicious infighting while I was there in
2011. There were at least three factions. I think I actually managed to stay
friendly with all three factions throughout the fighting, and I'm on speaking
terms with all three factions today. I occasionally converse productively
with them via email and phone.
I haven't figured out in my mind how to help resolve the Oregon situation
or how I think it should be resolved. I just do what the chair at the time
instructs me to do when it comes to Oregon (I've served under three chairs
now during this Oregon dispute). Otherwise, I try to keep staff and myself
out of it, and assume it could go on forever.
Nevertheless, against my better judgement, I'll offer the possibility that
I'd be willing to make an attempt to have a productive conversation will
all three factions in the Oregon dispute if all three factions want my help.
I consider the three factions in this dispute to be the Wagner group, the
Reeve's group, and the LNC. However, it would not be surprising to me if
one, two, or even all three of those groups would rather see me go jump in
the Potomac than wade into the Oregon dispute.
In any case, I do think it's sad to see so much fighting about this. Wish
we could find a way to work together, or at least work separately--rather
than work against each other.
Yours in liberty,
Wes Benedict, Executive Director
Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
New address: 1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314
(202) 333-0008 ext. 232, _wes.benedict at lp.org_
(mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org)
facebook.com/libertarians @LPNational
Join the Libertarian Party at: http://lp.org/membership
On 8/7/2014 5:48 PM, Alicia Mattson wrote:
The Wagner group has been for a while essentially treated as the affiliate
by our staff due to administrative decisions, rather than the past
decisions of the LNC which were to recognize the Reeves group and not the Wagner
group.
The only rationale I have heard for this is the Judicial Committee ruling
dated August 25, 2011. I have already explained numerous ways in which the
JC ruling is inoperable. Rather than repeat them all again while the
readers' eyes glaze over, I'll just emphasize that at the very least it is
inoperable because the Oregon SOS refuses to accept the responsibility the JC
attempted (without bylaw authority) to delegate to them. The JC said the
SOS has to do it. Then the SOS said a judge has to do it. The judge says the
party has to do it, in contradiction to the JC which said the party can't
do it. That's an inoperable JC decision in the most basic sense of the
word, without even having to dig into longer debates about rules which I have
previously presented, which I believe also make the JC ruling null and void.
I am asking for co-sponsors for the following motion:
----------START OF MOTION----------
WHEREAS, the national Libertarian Party's Judicial Committee ruling dated
August 25, 2011 is inoperable;
RESOLVED, the Libertarian National Committee (LNC) Secretary is directed
to send a letter to the Oregon Secretary of State:
1) Asking her office to correct their records because after May 21, 2011,
the outgoing chair of the Libertarian Party of Oregon (Wes Wagner) failed
to notify them of the expiration of his term; and
2) Reminding her that the LNC has several times acknowledged the
legitimacy of the Tim Reeves group of officers who were selected on May 21, 2011 to
replace them (and by implication, any subsequent successor officers);
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the LNC hereby directs staff to update their
records to reflect that the Tim Reeves group of officers are - and have
been since May 21, 2011 - the leadership of the Libertarian Party of Oregon
and that they are entitled to the same rights and privileges as that of any
other affiliate, including being listed on our party's website, subscribed
to the state chairs' email list, and sent monthly data files required by LNC
policy.
----------END OF MOTION----------
-Alicia
_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
_Lnc-business at hq.lp.org_ (mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org)
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20140807/f71552db/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list