[Lnc-business] adopting the convention minutes
Daniel Wiener
wiener at alum.mit.edu
Sat Nov 29 18:45:04 EST 2014
Alicia,
I noticed that on page 43 of the minutes, the following paragraph lacks an
internal sentence stating that the chair ruled against Mr. Moellman's point
of order:
Ken Moellman raised a point of order that candidates receiving less than a
majority are
not to be elected, thus the coin toss decision making process was not in
order. (Since the
requirement of a majority for election is in Convention Rule 8.2, rather
than in the
Bylaws, and the motion was to suspend the rules, see RONR 11th ed., p. 17,
lines 19-22.)
Dan Wiener
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
> As I mentioned in our previous LNC meeting, we had a draft of the
> convention minutes, but they needed a number of corrections before we
> adopted them.
>
> In the time since then, I've finished that work. During the Secretary's
> report in our December meeting, I intend to make a motion to adopt the
> convention minutes.
>
> The draft I am proposing for adoption is currently posted on the website
> on the minutes archive page, since the new bylaw requires that it be posted
> there for 14 days before the LNC can vote to approve it. Here is the
> direct link to it:
>
> https://www.lp.org/files/20140627-29_convention_minutes.pdf
>
> Alicia Mattson
> LNC Secretary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
--
*"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
-- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20141129/ee7f5790/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list