[Lnc-business] Professional Photographer at LNC Meeting

[Daniel Wiener]

I take strong exception to Dr. Lark's comments, in that I have long
considered myself to be the world record holder of the "least photogenic"
title.  Is the photographer's camera insured?  If so, I would suggest that
I go first.  That way after his camera is destroyed it will save us the
cost of the remaining pictures.

As to the timing of this creative destruction, I'd prefer that it not be
early in the morning.  I'm not an early-morning person, and I'll have a
hard enough time adjusting to the Arizona time zone (even though they are
not on Daylight Savings Time).

Dan Wiener


On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM, James Lark <jwl3s at virginia.edu> wrote:

> Dear colleagues:
>
>     I hope all is well with you.  I am planning to attend the meeting.
> All of the suggested times are fine with me, although the afternoon times
> may be the better choices; it is not unusual at meetings for at least one
> member to arrive after the call to order. Since I am the world's least
> photogenic person, it may be best if I am the last LNC member to be
> photographed.  (This would allow the other members to be photographed
> before the camera breaks.)
>
>     As always, thanks for your work for liberty.  I look forward to seeing
> you again soon.
>
>     Take care,
>     Jim
>
>     James W. Lark, III
>     Advisor, The Liberty Coalition
>     University of Virginia
>
>     Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> -----
>
>
> On 3/23/2015 2:50 PM, Nicholas Sarwark wrote:
>
>> If people can respond with whether you are attending the meeting and a
>> preference between doing photos at 8:00 am (before the meeting) or at
>> 12:00 or 12:30 during the lunch break, I'd appreciate it so I can do
>> scheduling and give the photographer a headcount.
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Brett Bittner <brett at brettbittner.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sam,
>>>
>>> I don't know that it'll make a difference after you break the lens of the
>>> photographer.
>>>
>>> Brett C. Bittner
>>>
>>> brett at brettbittner.com
>>> 404.492.6524
>>>
>>> "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much
>>> liberty
>>> than those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Sam Goldstein <
>>> goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Damn, now I'm going to have to get a haircut and trim my beard before
>>>> the
>>>> meeting!
>>>>
>>>> Sam
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LNC funds, approximate cost is $100 per person, the photographer will
>>>>> waive his normal $200 setup fee.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Scott L. <scott73 at earthlink.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the photographer is not donating his or her services, who is paying
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> these photographs of LNC members?  How much will these photos cost per
>>>>>> person?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously SOMEONE has to be paying for them, one way or another.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don’t assume I am against this project.  Having high quality
>>>>>> photos
>>>>>> of LNC members is a good idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But since LNC members will receive a copy of the photo, I want to make
>>>>>> sure
>>>>>> the financial arrangements are transparent to our members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Scott Lieberman
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I'm planning on having a professional photographer do some headshots
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and other high-quality images for the media.  He's based in Phoenix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and would be able to also do headshots for each member of the LNC in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> attendence at this weekend's meeting in Phoenix.  The images would be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> provided to each member on DVD and also available to update our
>>>>>>
>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking Saturday morning would be best, but if people have a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> different preference, please let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to give you the heads up so you can pack appropriately for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how you'd like to appear in photographs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Nick"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>



-- 
*"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
-- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150323/555ae1c8/attachment-0002.html>