[Lnc-business] Professional Photographer at LNC Meeting

Mon Mar 23 20:04:02 EDT 2015

I thought I was the least photogenic person on the planet.  Are there
others?  LOL
VK

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Daniel Wiener <wiener at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I take strong exception to Dr. Lark's comments, in that I have long
> considered myself to be the world record holder of the "least photogenic"
> title.  Is the photographer's camera insured?  If so, I would suggest that
> I go first.  That way after his camera is destroyed it will save us the
> cost of the remaining pictures.
>
> As to the timing of this creative destruction, I'd prefer that it not be
> early in the morning.  I'm not an early-morning person, and I'll have a
> hard enough time adjusting to the Arizona time zone (even though they are
> not on Daylight Savings Time).
>
> Dan Wiener
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM, James Lark <jwl3s at virginia.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues:
>>
>>     I hope all is well with you.  I am planning to attend the meeting.
>> All of the suggested times are fine with me, although the afternoon times
>> may be the better choices; it is not unusual at meetings for at least one
>> member to arrive after the call to order. Since I am the world's least
>> photogenic person, it may be best if I am the last LNC member to be
>> photographed.  (This would allow the other members to be photographed
>> before the camera breaks.)
>>
>>     As always, thanks for your work for liberty.  I look forward to
>> seeing you again soon.
>>
>>     Take care,
>>     Jim
>>
>>     James W. Lark, III
>>     Advisor, The Liberty Coalition
>>     University of Virginia
>>
>>     Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>> -----
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/2015 2:50 PM, Nicholas Sarwark wrote:
>>
>>> If people can respond with whether you are attending the meeting and a
>>> preference between doing photos at 8:00 am (before the meeting) or at
>>> 12:00 or 12:30 during the lunch break, I'd appreciate it so I can do
>>> scheduling and give the photographer a headcount.
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Brett Bittner <brett at brettbittner.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sam,
>>>>
>>>> I don't know that it'll make a difference after you break the lens of
>>>> the
>>>> photographer.
>>>>
>>>> Brett C. Bittner
>>>>
>>>> brett at brettbittner.com
>>>> 404.492.6524
>>>>
>>>> "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much
>>>> liberty
>>>> than those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Sam Goldstein <
>>>> goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Damn, now I'm going to have to get a haircut and trim my beard before
>>>>> the
>>>>> meeting!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sam
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> LNC funds, approximate cost is $100 per person, the photographer will
>>>>>> waive his normal $200 setup fee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Nick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Scott L. <scott73 at earthlink.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the photographer is not donating his or her services, who is
>>>>>>> paying
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> these photographs of LNC members?  How much will these photos cost
>>>>>>> per
>>>>>>> person?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obviously SOMEONE has to be paying for them, one way or another.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please don’t assume I am against this project.  Having high quality
>>>>>>> photos
>>>>>>> of LNC members is a good idea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But since LNC members will receive a copy of the photo, I want to
>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>> the financial arrangements are transparent to our members.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Scott Lieberman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I'm planning on having a professional photographer do some headshots
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and other high-quality images for the media.  He's based in Phoenix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and would be able to also do headshots for each member of the LNC in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> attendence at this weekend's meeting in Phoenix.  The images would be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provided to each member on DVD and also available to update our
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm thinking Saturday morning would be best, but if people have a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> different preference, please let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to give you the heads up so you can pack appropriately for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how you'd like to appear in photographs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Nick"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
> -- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150323/bd82589b/attachment-0002.html>