[Lnc-business] Dates to avoid in February and March?

[Sam Goldstein]

Ok, if no one else wants to start the process, then I'm seeking co-sponsors
for the following motion:

"The dates for the first LNC meeting of 2016 will be March 5-6.  The
meeting will be held at Indianapolis, IN"

There are several LNC members within driving distrance, flights and hotels
are fairly reasonable and there has
been no LNC presense in Indiana since the 2000 Convention.

Live Free,

Sam Goldstein
LNC At-Large






On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Vicki Kirkland <vickilp12 at gmail.com> wrote:

>  I don't know of any conflicts..
>
> VK
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Roland Riemers <riemers at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> No conflicts that I know of.
>>
>> Roland ND
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Daniel Wiener <wiener at alum.mit.edu>
>> *To:* "lnc-business at hq.lp.org" <lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 24, 2015 12:34 PM
>> *Subject:* [Lnc-business] Dates to avoid in February and March?
>>
>> Before we come to any decisions on a our next LNC meeting, it would be
>> good to know what conflicts, if any, people may have with dates in February
>> or March.  I'd therefore request that anyone with a date conflict announce
>> it on this list as soon as possible.  If you know of a conflict, and don't
>> announce it, you'll have less of an excuse to complain if we end of picking
>> that date.
>>
>> For myself, the only conflict I know of is on February 7th, when the
>> Packers are expected to be playing in the Superbowl.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> --
>> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
>> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
>> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
>> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
>> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
>> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
>> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
>> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
>> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
>> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
>> -- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20151025/1fb7f731/attachment-0002.html>