[Lnc-business] Letter to all of the Presidential candidates

[Guy McLendon]

100% concur with Alicia on this …

 

 

From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of Alicia Mattson
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 4:58 PM
To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Letter to all of the Presidential candidates

 

I will not be in favor of contract terms that require potential presidential candidates to hand over their email lists that they accumulated prior to receiving our nomination.  I think that attempting to use that as a negotiating tactic just to see what we can get from them in exchange for eliminating that provision would discourage any celebrity candidates and only attract candidates who have no such asset.  Suppose John Stossel or Judge Napolitano were interested in our nomination.  Is that equitable to demand that we get the benefit of their life's work? We're not offering to give them our list.  Their mailings to our list would go through a bonded mail house.


Let's not scare off the people who we would most like to court.

I will not consider it a negative against a candidate who balks at such a provision.

 

-Alicia



 

 

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:

Dear All,

Attached is a letter that I have sent to all of the Presidential
candidates.  Rather than ask for a commitment to a particular
contract, I have asked that they commit to some core provisions we
would like to have our nominee agree to.

Yours in liberty,
Nick

_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160509/a73bee5b/attachment-0002.html>