[Lnc-business] Policy Manual - Regional Representatives

Mon Jun 27 08:55:12 EDT 2016

It is very good this discussion is taking place.

I would like to bring up a point of mine that was in the other chain ....
Remember that putting something more formally not only instructs the new RR
(and I disagree it is just "obvious"- if it were this discussion would not
be happening - many RRs end up in this situation as well as Alts- no one
ran for my Alt, it was all last minute decisions at the region
meeting)....but this information also informs *members* what they are
entitled to expect. I ran a multi-month campaign and had time to prepare
and learn.  My IPR work also gave me insight but not everyone is in this
position.

In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Region 1 Representative
(Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
Washington)

*PS: remember, please sign your emails... the sender information is often
unclear when this goes to the public list, and the members can have a hard
time keeping track of who said what, and they deserve to know.*

On Monday, June 27, 2016, David Demarest <dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:

> Caryn, thanks for the clarifications and I agree with your latest revision.
>
>
>
> And, yes, much of my concern would be alleviated by Sam’s suggestion of a
> brief post-convention LNC orientation session for new LNC members. I did
> not seek the Region 6 Representative. Not knowing what was involved, I was
> completely caught by surprise as it evolved. That being said, it is a good
> fit and I enthusiastically accept the challenge. However, my initial
> reaction was “Wow this is a great opportunity, but now what?”
>
>
>
> If the regional organization is a value add to the LNC, and I emphatically
> think it is, than surely the LNC should take it seriously and provide
> clear, unambiguous and documented guidance on regional representative
> responsibilities if for no other reason than providing a viable pipeline
> for future LNC talent.
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>
>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org');>] *On
> Behalf Of *Caryn Ann Harlos
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:23 PM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Policy Manual - Regional Representatives
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I note that the Bylaws state,
>
>
>
> *Representative regions" may be formed or dissolved once every two years
> during a  period beginning 90 days before the beginning of and ending on
> the second day of the  National Convention, and notice of new formations or
> dissolutions must be given  in  writing to the national Secretary prior to
> the close of the Convention at which they take  place. *
>
>
>
> So there is something that must be reduced to writing, even if it is just
> "hey we're a region now."  But I see that my proposed change to David's
> proposal does make it seem like something much more formal is required.  So
> I would change my wording to:
>
>
>
> LNC Regional Representatives and Alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> the State Chairs of the affiliates comprising their Region or as specified
> in the Region Formation Agreement if any, are encouraged to provide a
> transparent channel that facilitates mutually supportive communication
> between the LNC and Officers and members of the regional state affiliates.
> Actual regional organization policies and additional duties are left to the
> discretion of and agreement between the member state chairs and their
> Regional Representatives and Alternates.
>
>
>
> and for clarification, I don't think David is proposing a motion... he is
> seeking discussion which may lead to a motion, but I think more airing out
> an issue that exists.
>
>
>
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
>
>
> *PS: remember, please sign your emails... the sender information is often
> unclear when this goes to the public list, and the members can have a hard
> time keeping track of who said what, and they deserve to know.*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
> carynannharlos at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
>
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
>
>
> *PS: remember, please sign your emails... the sender information is often
> unclear when this goes to the public list, and the members can have a hard
> time keeping track of who said what, and they deserve to know.*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','agmattson at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> The Delegation Chair's Manual says:
>
> "Some regions opt to use regional formation agreements to document
> mutually agreed upon rules for their region before any future disputes
> arise.  A recommended basic regional agreement is included at the end of
> this document, though you are not required to use this particular one or
> any one at all."
>
>
>
> This motion suggests that each region has one, and it includes information
> beyond just "We're a region!"
>
> -Alicia
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
> carynannharlos at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Alicia, it was my understanding from the Delegate Chair Manual that every
> region does have to sign a region formation agreement, even if it was
> something as simple as "We're a region!"  - that would be the agreement.
>
>
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
>
>
> *PS: remember, please sign your emails... the sender information is often
> unclear when this goes to the public list, and the members can have a hard
> time keeping track of who said what, and they deserve to know.*
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','agmattson at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> I agree with Ken here in terms of how useful this would be.  If someone
> isn't going to read the bylaws and see how the region reps work, why would
> they read the policy manual to see someone else's attempt to describe
> what's in the bylaws?  I don't see this as solving the described problem.
>
> I also would quibble with some of the language.  For example, not every
> region has a region formation agreement, though this language suggests they
> do.  Some merely sign a piece of paper saying "We're a region!"
>
> -Alicia
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As designed and codified in the bylaws today, the regions are autonomous,
> and have the right to determine their own reps as they see fit (by mutual
> agreement, or otherwise by the state chairs by default).  The Region
> Representative represents the region. They serve the region at their
> leisure. This is already codified in the bylaws. I don't see a reason to
> reiterate this any further in other documents.  I would suggest that it
> would only clutter the already-lengthy document.
>
> In 2014, I suggested reorganizing regions based on Federal Court
> districts, with multiple districts in each region to make the national
> membership numbers in each region almost equal. The goal of this approach
> was to foster communication between states in the same federal court
> circuits, since Court of Appeals ruling effect every state in the
> district.   This never gained traction for multiple reasons, the largest of
> which seemed to be protecting silly fiefdoms. I've personally moved on to
> build those relationships outside of the Region Reps.  I introduced LPKY's
> attorney to the counsel for LPTN and LPMI at the national convention, and
> LPKY's attorney has now worked with LPO's attorney.
>
> I do think we should consider reducing the number of regions and at-large
> positions by 1, keeping a balance between those elected by the entire body
> and those elected from districts.
>
> Just my $0.02 on the matter.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
> LPKY Judicial Committee
>
>
>
> On 2016-06-26 13:36, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> There is a problem.  Whether this is a solution or not is another matter,
> but I think it certainly adds clarity. We must remember that the Policy
> Manual isn't *only* for the LNC but for the members to *understand* the
> LNC.  I read it when I was a new member (no wisecracks Sam!).  Now I
> realize I am an aberration in  my zeal to read our documents but that is in
> fact another purpose of it.  Most members have zero idea they even have a
> regional representative, and in fact, what use such a person is.  Perhaps
> the un-regioned (made that word up) states would be more likely to join a
> region if they saw the value and the value was made a part of the record.
>
>
>
> This is definitely a problem because there are regional representatives
> who come in going now what?  I found myself in a different position in that
> I was already entrenched as a non-LNC member in the goings on, attending
> and writing about meetings, reading the lists etc, and did an active
> campaign for the position that I decided on well in advance.  But
> oftentimes (whether this is good or not is another issue) regional
> representatives are chosen and decided at the region meeting with little
> prior intent.  Either no one campaigned, or someone decides they don't like
> the choices, and heck, better step up.  Whatever the reason, we find
> ourselves with absolutely no guidance on what the heck it is we are
> supposed to do.  The fact is, I just took it upon myself to start doing
> things and interfacing with my region in ways I thought were a good idea,
> but it would be great to know what has been learned from the past.
> Again.... institutional knowledge, we are terrible at it.
>
>
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
>
>
> *PS: remember, please sign your emails... the sender information is often
> unclear when this goes to the public list, and the members can have a hard
> time keeping track of who said what, and they deserve to know.*
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:14 AM, David Demarest <
> dpdemarest at centurylink.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dpdemarest at centurylink.net');>> wrote:
>
> I am good with Caryn's suggested revision.
>
>
>
> Others?
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>
>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org');>] *On
> Behalf Of *David Demarest
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 12:04 PM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Policy Manual - Regional Representatives
>
>
>
> Thanks Caryn. I have pasted in the previous responses for background
> information.
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org');>] *On
> Behalf Of *Caryn Ann Harlos
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:45 AM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Subject:* [Lnc-business] Policy Manual - Regional Representatives
>
>
>
> I am starting this new chain for the discussion on David's proposal to add
> a section to the Policy Manual on Regional Representatives.  This was
> David's initial working proposal as a starting point:
>
>
>
> LNC regional representatives and alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> the region member state chairs are encouraged to provide a transparent
> channel that facilitates mutually supportive communication between the LNC
> and officers and members of the regional state organizations. Actual
> regional organization policies are left to the discretion of and agreement
> between the member state chairs and their regional representatives and
> alternates.
>
>
>
> I suggest this change:
>
>
>
> LNC Regional Representatives and Alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> their Region, as specified in the Region Formation Agreement, are
> encouraged to provide a transparent channel that facilitates mutually
> supportive communication between the LNC and Officers and members of the
> regional state affiliates. Actual regional organization policies and
> additional duties are left to the discretion of and agreement between the
> member state chairs and their Regional Representatives and Alternates.
>
>
>
> --
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
> Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Caryn. Can you provide an alternative example and how we might
> modify the proposed statement to address that alternative?
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> *Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High and LIVE FREE!*
>
>
>
> *The Invisible Hand of Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
> Government!*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org');>] *On
> Behalf Of *Caryn Ann Harlos
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 10:59 AM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Cc:* david.demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.demarest at firstdata.com');>; David
> Demarest <secretary at lpne.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','secretary at lpne.org');>>; lnc-business <
> lnc-business at lp.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at lp.org');>>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] details for electronic mail ballots
>
>
>
> Yes that is what I was thinking- a policy manual section.
>
>
>
> David also, not all reps serve at the pleasure of the state chairs- that
> is the default.  The region agreement can specify otherwise.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David Demarest [mailto:secretary at lpne.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','secretary at lpne.org');>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:13 AM
> *To:* 'Sam Goldstein' <goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com');>>; '
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>' <
> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>>
> *Cc:* 'lnc-business' <lnc-business at lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at lp.org');>>; '
> david.demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.demarest at firstdata.com');>' <
> david.demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.demarest at firstdata.com');>>
> *Subject:* RE: [Lnc-business] details for electronic mail ballots
>
>
>
> Thanks Sam – makes sense to put it in the policy manual. What is the
> procedure to get a Regional Representative responsibilities statement added
> to the policy manual?
>
>
>
> By the way, the original idea for the following suggested policy statement
> came from the fertile mind of Brett Bittner, Region 3 Representative.
> Thanks Brett!
>
>
>
> LNC regional representatives and alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> the region member state chairs are encouraged to provide a transparent
> channel that facilitates mutually supportive communication between the LNC
> and officers and members of the regional state organizations. Actual
> regional organization policies are left to the discretion of and agreement
> between the member state chairs and their regional representatives and
> alternates.
>
>
>
> Any suggested revisions to the above text?
>
>
>
> *The Invisible Hand of Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
> Government!*
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org');>] *On
> Behalf Of *Caryn Ann Harlos
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:16 AM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Cc:* david.demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.demarest at firstdata.com');>;
> lnc-business <lnc-business at lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at lp.org');>>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] details for electronic mail ballots
>
>
>
> David, can you start a new thread with the right title?  This is still
> under "electronic email ballot" and will be impossible to find in the
> future.
>
>
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, David Demarest <secretary at lpne.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','secretary at lpne.org');>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Sam – makes sense to put it in the policy manual. What is the
> procedure to get a Regional Representative responsibilities statement added
> to the policy manual?
>
>
>
> By the way, the original idea for the following suggested policy statement
> came from the fertile mind of Brett Bittner, Region 3 Representative.
> Thanks Brett!
>
>
>
> LNC regional representatives and alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> the region member state chairs are encouraged to provide a transparent
> channel that facilitates mutually supportive communication between the LNC
> and officers and members of the regional state organizations. Actual
> regional organization policies are left to the discretion of and agreement
> between the member state chairs and their regional representatives and
> alternates.
>
>
>
> Any suggested revisions to the above text?
>
>
>
> *The Invisible Hand of Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
> Government!*
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
> Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee
>
> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>
> Secretary at LPNE.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Secretary at LPNE.org');>
>
> David.Demarest at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','David.Demarest at LP.org');>
>
> DPDemarest at centurylink.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','DPDemarest at centurylink.net');>
>
> David.Demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','David.Demarest at firstdata.com');>
>
> http://www.LPNE.org <http://www.lpne.org/>
>
> http://www.LP.org <http://www.lp.org/>
>
> Cell:      402-981-6469
>
> Home: 402-493-0873
>
> Office: 402-222-7207
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sam Goldstein [mailto:goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com');>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2016 10:37 AM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> *Cc:* lnc-business <lnc-business at lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at lp.org');>>;
> david.demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.demarest at firstdata.com');>; David
> Demarest <secretary at lpne.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','secretary at lpne.org');>>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] details for electronic mail ballots
>
>
>
> David,
>
>
>
> The LNC has no power to change the By-Laws, only the delegates in
> convention.  The LNC can amend the Policy Manual so it might be best to
> look for a place to insert your suggested Regional Representative
> responsiblities language in that document.  There are very few mentions of
> Regional Reps in the current language and the only responsibility outlined
> is the Regional Report to be submitted prior to every LNC meeting.
>
>
>
> Having a definition inserted in the Policy Manual would help future
> newbies in determining their role and might encourage more people to seed a
> spot from their region.
>
>
>
> Live Free,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sam Goldstein
>
> Libertarian National Committee
>
> Member at Large
>
> 8925 N Meridian St, Ste 101
>
> Indianapolis IN 46260
>
> 317-850-0726 Phone
>
> 317-582-1773 Fax
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:33 AM, David Demarest <
> dpdemarest at centurylink.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dpdemarest at centurylink.net');>> wrote:
>
> Alicia – Thank you for very clear and unambiguous instructions and
> procedures on LNC email balloting – very helpful to us newcomers on the
> board!
>
>
>
> On a similar but separate subject, at your convenience when your schedule
> is not so crazy, I would appreciate receiving similar instructions and
> procedures excerpted from the bylaws or elsewhere in LNC documentation that
>  clearly delineates the roles and responsibilities of regional
> representatives and their alternates. With Caryn Ann Harlos' help, I see
> some of region structure mechanical details. However, I have not been able
> to locate any LNC documentation that spells out regional representative and
> alternate roles and responsibilities.
>
>
>
> Caryn Ann and I have discussed a possible default description of regional
> representative and alternate roles and responsibilities. I submit the
> following for discussion:
>
>
>
> LNC regional representatives and alternates who serve at the pleasure of
> the region member state chairs are encouraged to provide a transparent
> channel that facilitates mutually supportive communication between the LNC
> and officers and members of the regional state organizations. Actual
> regional organization policies are left to the discretion of and agreement
> between the member state chairs and their regional representatives and
> alternates.
>
>
>
> Question: Should the above be offered as a motion or as an amendment to
> the bylaws? If a motion is appropriate, in addition to Caryn, are there two
> more board members that would like to co-sponsor such a motion following
> discussion and revisions?
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> *Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High and LIVE FREE!*
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
> Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee
>
> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>
> Secretary at LPNE.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Secretary at LPNE.org');>
>
> David.Demarest at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','David.Demarest at LP.org');>
>
> DPDemarest at centurylink.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','DPDemarest at centurylink.net');>
>
> David.Demarest at firstdata.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','David.Demarest at firstdata.com');>
>
> http://www.LPNE.org <http://www.lpne.org/>
>
> http://www.LP.org <http://www.lp.org/>
>
> Cell:      402-981-6469
>
> Home: 402-493-0873
>
> Office: 402-222-7207
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
> Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
> Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
> Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> In Liberty,
>
> Caryn Ann Harlos
>
> Region 1 Representative
>
> (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
> Washington)
>
> Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>

-- 
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Region 1 Representative
(Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
Washington)
Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160627/7fb65b3a/attachment-0002.html>