[Lnc-business] Results of Doodle

Ken Moellman ken.moellman at lpky.org
Fri Sep 16 14:12:53 EDT 2016


 

Can we find out who can attend this meeting? 

It sounds as though Region 3 will not be able to attend. Mr. Bittner has
a packed schedule that weekend and cannot attend, and I fly for work
early on Monday morning (Eastern Time) making a late conference call
unreasonable. 

I believe that we have also heard that our Chairman would not be in
attendance, as well. 

---
Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
LPKY Judicial Committee 

On 2016-09-15 23:45, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote: 

> There are now six LNC members requesting this meeting (the 1/3 threshold is reached). 
> 
> Katz, Hayes, Harlos, Demarest, McKnight, and Hewitt. 
> 
> Will the Chair please set the meeting? 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, hdigger2004 <hdigger2004 at aol.com> wrote:
> 
> I also request the teleconference on Sept. 25th. Jeff Hewitt Region 4 
> 
> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S(R) 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Patrick McKnight <patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com> 
> Date: 9/15/2016 6:15 PM (GMT-08:00) 
> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org 
> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Results of Doodle 
> 
> I also request the above mentioned teleconference. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Patrick McKnight 
> Region 8 Rep 
> 
> On Sep 15, 2016 2:18 PM, "Joshua Katz" <planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> To be clear, I wasn't asking the Chair to override the LNC and call a meeting. My comments are directed to the LNC as a whole, not you. If we're not going to meet, it would be nice to at least have a few members perhaps weigh in as to why email ballots - which basically exist, so far as I can tell, because in the past the technology for synchronous meetings didn't exist - are a better way to resolve this question, given the parliamentary constraints I mentioned this morning. 
> 
> However, I don't think I'll get 6 requstors. Given that, what is the feeling about an informal teleconference at which no business is discussed? 
> 
> Joshua A. Katz 
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat) 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:
> Four members of the LNC have requested an online meeting on September 25.
> 
> I anticipate flying to New York on that day, since there's something
> happening on Long Island the day after, but my personal availability
> should not be the deciding factor.
> 
> The bigger concern I have with calling a meeting is that only 4 out of
> 25 members and alternates have indicated a desire for one. If a
> majority of the committee wants a meeting, I'll call one. If not, I
> won't.
> 
> -Nick
> 
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> <carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Chair has asked us to approve via email the budget increases. I believe
>> an actual deliberative meeting is the appropriate way to handle and urge
>> others to join this request.
>> 
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> 
>> On Sunday, September 11, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message is sent to note that the Policy Manual states in Section 1.01
>>> (2) that the Chair shall set the agenda for all LNC sessions. The members
>>> proposing a meeting are to only suggest the topics, per Section 1.02 (7)(e).
>>> 
>>> To that end, I would suggest to the chair that the agenda be structured in
>>> a way where committee transparency comes before committee population. I
>>> suggest this because some may make a decision on where and how to serve
>>> based on the rules, and if the rules are changing, it might be good to get
>>> the rule changes down first.
>>> 
>>> I personally still believe that we need an in-person meeting to discuss
>>> the details of the transparency proposal in an efficient manner.
>>> 
>>> And Section 1.03 (1) says the IT Committee is populated by the LNC chair,
>>> not the LNC itself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2016-09-11 18:11, Joshua Katz wrote:
>>> 
>>> For reference, here is the request I am referencing:
>>> 
>>> I am seeking co-requesters for a teleconference meeting to be held
>>> Saturday, September 24, 2016, at 5PM Pacific - 7PM Pacific. I am happy to
>>> adjust date and time if needed; I'm basing this off my memory and Caryn's
>>> assistance.
>>> 
>>> The agenda items would be as follows:
>>> Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget
>>> Populating Committees
>>> Transparency for Committees
>>> 
>>> The items would be in that order, and there would be, I hope, a 2 hour
>>> hard stop. (According to some recent research, a 72 minute hard stop would
>>> be better, but that's not realistic.)
>>> 
>>> It is my belief that these items, particularly the budget item, can be
>>> dealt with fairly easily at such a meeting if we do the spadework here, and
>>> might possibly be questions that come out differently at such a meeting vs.
>>> email. In other words, I think they would profit from real-time discussion
>>> and deliberation.
>>> 
>>> Furthermore, there was a request to assign times to items. My proposal is
>>> below. None of these are intended as special orders; rather, I include the
>>> times simply to indicate the time to be allocated to each item.
>>> 
>>> 5:00 - 5:05 Pacific: Credentialing and housekeeping
>>> 5:05 - 6:05: Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget
>>> 6:05 - 6:25: Populating Committees
>>> 6:25 - 6:45: Transparency for Committees
>>> 6:45 - 7:00: Public comment and announcements
>>> 
>>> It is my hope that less time will be needed than this and that we'll end
>>> early.
>>> 
>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> There were 6 votes cast. There were no dates receiving 6 votes, but the
>>>> 25th (Sunday) had 5 votes, which was the most. Therefore, I am still
>>>> seeking co-requesters for the 25th.
>>>> 
>>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
>> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1]
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1] 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1]

_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1]

 -- 

IN LIBERTY, 
CARYN ANN HARLOS 
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -
Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org 
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado [2] 
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus [3] 

_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1] 

Links:
------
[1] http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
[2] http://www.lpcolorado.org
[3] http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160916/4209d4b6/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list