[Lnc-business] Results of Doodle

Fri Sep 16 14:59:28 EDT 2016

I can.

Whitney Bilyeu
Region 7 Rep

On Sep 16, 2016 1:13 PM, "Ken Moellman" <ken.moellman at lpky.org> wrote:

>
> Can we find out who can attend this meeting?
>
> It sounds as though Region 3 will not be able to attend.  Mr. Bittner has
> a packed schedule that weekend and cannot attend, and I fly for work early
> on Monday morning (Eastern Time) making a late conference call unreasonable.
>
> I believe that we have also heard that our Chairman would not be in
> attendance, as well.
>
> ---
>
> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
> LPKY Judicial Committee
>
>
>
> On 2016-09-15 23:45, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> There are now six LNC members requesting this meeting (the 1/3 threshold
> is reached).
>
> Katz, Hayes, Harlos, Demarest, McKnight, and Hewitt.
>
> Will the Chair please set the meeting?
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, hdigger2004 <hdigger2004 at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> I also request the teleconference on Sept. 25th. Jeff Hewitt Region 4
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Patrick McKnight <patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com>
>> Date: 9/15/2016 6:15 PM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Results of Doodle
>>
>> I also request the above mentioned teleconference.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Patrick McKnight
>> Region 8 Rep
>>
>> On Sep 15, 2016 2:18 PM, "Joshua Katz" <planning4liberty at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> To be clear, I wasn't asking the Chair to override the LNC and call a
>>> meeting.  My comments are directed to the LNC as a whole, not you.  If
>>> we're not going to meet, it would be nice to at least have a few members
>>> perhaps weigh in as to why email ballots - which basically exist, so far as
>>> I can tell, because in the past the technology for synchronous meetings
>>> didn't exist - are a better way to resolve this question, given the
>>> parliamentary constraints I mentioned this morning.
>>>
>>> However, I don't think I'll get 6 requstors.  Given that, what is the
>>> feeling about an informal teleconference at which no business is discussed?
>>>
>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Four members of the LNC have requested an online meeting on September
>>>> 25.
>>>>
>>>> I anticipate flying to New York on that day, since there's something
>>>> happening on Long Island the day after, but my personal availability
>>>> should not be the deciding factor.
>>>>
>>>> The bigger concern I have with calling a meeting is that only 4 out of
>>>> 25 members and alternates have indicated a desire for one.  If a
>>>> majority of the committee wants a meeting, I'll call one.  If not, I
>>>> won't.
>>>>
>>>> -Nick
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>> <carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > The Chair has asked us to approve via email the budget increases.  I
>>>> believe
>>>> > an actual deliberative meeting is the appropriate way to handle and
>>>> urge
>>>> > others to join this request.
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona,
>>>> > Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -
>>>> Caryn.Ann.
>>>> > Harlos at LP.org
>>>> > Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> > Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This message is sent to note that the Policy Manual states in
>>>> Section 1.01
>>>> >> (2) that the Chair shall set the agenda for all LNC sessions. The
>>>> members
>>>> >> proposing a meeting are to only suggest the topics, per Section 1.02
>>>> (7)(e).
>>>> >>
>>>> >> To that end, I would suggest to the chair that the agenda be
>>>> structured in
>>>> >> a way where committee transparency comes before committee
>>>> population.  I
>>>> >> suggest this because some may make a decision on where and how to
>>>> serve
>>>> >> based on the rules, and if the rules are changing, it might be good
>>>> to get
>>>> >> the rule changes down first.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I personally still believe that we need an in-person meeting to
>>>> discuss
>>>> >> the details of the transparency proposal in an efficient manner.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And Section 1.03 (1) says the IT Committee is populated by the LNC
>>>> chair,
>>>> >> not the LNC itself.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ---
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>>> >> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>>> >> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 2016-09-11 18:11, Joshua Katz wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For reference, here is the request I am referencing:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I am seeking co-requesters for a teleconference meeting to be held
>>>> >> Saturday, September 24, 2016, at 5PM Pacific - 7PM Pacific.  I am
>>>> happy to
>>>> >> adjust date and time if needed; I'm basing this off my memory and
>>>> Caryn's
>>>> >> assistance.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The agenda items would be as follows:
>>>> >> Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget
>>>> >> Populating Committees
>>>> >> Transparency for Committees
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The items would be in that order, and there would be, I hope, a 2
>>>> hour
>>>> >> hard stop.  (According to some recent research, a 72 minute hard
>>>> stop would
>>>> >> be better, but that's not realistic.)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It is my belief that these items, particularly the budget item, can
>>>> be
>>>> >> dealt with fairly easily at such a meeting if we do the spadework
>>>> here, and
>>>> >> might possibly be questions that come out differently at such a
>>>> meeting vs.
>>>> >> email.  In other words, I think they would profit from real-time
>>>> discussion
>>>> >> and deliberation.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Furthermore, there was a request to assign times to items.  My
>>>> proposal is
>>>> >> below.  None of these are intended as special orders; rather, I
>>>> include the
>>>> >> times simply to indicate the time to be allocated to each item.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 5:00 - 5:05 Pacific:  Credentialing and housekeeping
>>>> >> 5:05 - 6:05:  Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget
>>>> >> 6:05 - 6:25:  Populating Committees
>>>> >> 6:25 - 6:45:  Transparency for Committees
>>>> >> 6:45 - 7:00:  Public comment and announcements
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It is my hope that less time will be needed than this and that we'll
>>>> end
>>>> >> early.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Joshua A. Katz
>>>> >> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Joshua Katz <
>>>> planning4liberty at gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> There were 6 votes cast.  There were no dates receiving 6 votes,
>>>> but the
>>>> >>> 25th (Sunday) had 5 votes, which was the most.  Therefore, I am
>>>> still
>>>> >>> seeking co-requesters for the 25th.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Joshua A. Katz
>>>> >>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> >> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> >> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona,
>>>> > Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -
>>>> Caryn.Ann.
>>>> > Harlos at LP.org
>>>> > Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> > Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> > Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> > http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160916/2d37c0d9/attachment-0002.html>