[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-12: LPKY SCOTUS Appeal

[Ken Moellman]

Here are the links from BAN on the KY ballot access case. Unfortunately,
we received word today that the petition to have it re-heard en banc was
rejected by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. I still think it would be
wise for the LNC to hold an Executive Session meeting with Chris Wiest
and Oliver Hall to have questions answered. 

Case filed in federal court: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/04/15/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-reply-brief-in-ballot-access-case/
[2] 

Oral arguments: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/05/11/u-s-district-court-sets-may-19-oral-argument-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[3] 

District upholds definition: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/08/u-s-district-court-upholds-kentuckys-definition-of-a-qualified-political-party/
[4] 

Case expedited: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/14/sixth-circuit-expedites-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[5] 

Filing of a brief in case: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/22/libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-brief-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[6] 

Appeal to 6th Circuit: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/26/sixth-circuit-upholds-kentuckys-failure-to-have-a-procedure-for-an-unqualified-party-to-become-a-qualified-party-in-advance-of-any-particular-election/
[7] 

Filing for re-hearing en banc: 

http://ballot-access.org/2016/09/07/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-ask-for-rehearing-in-case-on-definition-of-political-party/
[8] 

---
Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
LPKY Judicial Committee 

On 2016-09-25 15:50, Alicia Mattson wrote: 

> I'm going to want more information on this before I vote. Sometimes there are quite strategic considerations to whether or not a particular case should be appealed, and those things should not be discussed in front of Democrats and Republicans on a public list.
> 
> I checked Ballot Access News and didn't see this case in the first three pages of articles. Can someone post the link where I can get a little more detail so I'm not voting in the dark?
> 
> -Alicia
> 
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> We have an electronic mail ballot. 
>> Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by October 5, 2016 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
>> 
>> Co-Sponsors: Katz, Harlos, Redpath, Hayes
>> 
>> Motion: The LNC will allocate from Legal Offense $2000 to fund a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court in the Kentucky Ballot Access case.
>> 
>> -Alicia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [1]
 

Links:
------
[1] http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
[2]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/04/15/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-reply-brief-in-ballot-access-case/
[3]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/05/11/u-s-district-court-sets-may-19-oral-argument-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[4]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/08/u-s-district-court-upholds-kentuckys-definition-of-a-qualified-political-party/
[5]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/14/sixth-circuit-expedites-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[6]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/07/22/libertarian-and-constitution-parties-file-brief-in-kentucky-ballot-access-case/
[7]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/26/sixth-circuit-upholds-kentuckys-failure-to-have-a-procedure-for-an-unqualified-party-to-become-a-qualified-party-in-advance-of-any-particular-election/
[8]
http://ballot-access.org/2016/09/07/kentucky-libertarian-and-constitution-parties-ask-for-rehearing-in-case-on-definition-of-political-party/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160927/66ecede1/attachment-0002.html>