[Lnc-business] Lack of Follow-Through?

[Starchild]

	In general I'd say LNC responsibilities not specified in the Bylaws should be overseen via a functional, transparent committee system. So I would suggest either assigning the task to an existing committee, or if no current committee seems appropriate, creating a new committee for the purpose.

Love & Liberty,
                                 ((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                               (415) 625-FREE


On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Whitney Bilyeu wrote:
> Who would be responsible for updating it and delegating each action item, then checking it off the list?
> 
> 
> On Oct 14, 2016 5:04 PM, "Starchild" <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 	Good catch, Caryn. I agree this is a problem. I'd suggest we establish a page on the LP.org website where motions passed by the LNC that require some kind of action are listed.
> 
> 	Anyone have any objections to a motion mandating the creation of such a page?
> 
> Love & Liberty,
>                                  ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                               (415) 625-FREE
> 
> 
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> 
>> It seems to me that we have a lack of follow-through. I was looking for a past decision on our Party slogan made by Norm, and ran across this:
>> 
>> OUTREACH MATERIAL
>> 
>> Mr. Olsen moved that the LNC Chair is requested to direct staff to produce outreach materials for use by the national office and all Libertarian National Committee affiliates concerning the following topics: the economy (regulation, national debt, crony capitalism, Federal Reserve), civil & property rights (justice system, civil forfeiture, police violence), the War on Terror, gun rights.
>> 
>> Following debate, the vote on the main motion was as follows:
>> 
>> Voting “aye”: Feldman, Goldstein, Hagan, Johnson, Lark, Marsh, Mattson, McLendon, Olsen, Redpath, Sarwark, Vohra, Wiener
>> 
>> Voting “no”: Katz, Riemers Abstaining: Ludlow
>> 
>> _________________
>> 
>> Was this even done?  It seems to have fallen into the institutional black hole like the discussion at the last formal meeting to reach out to Log Cabin Republicans, which does not appear to have ever been done.  (And I asked on this list later about it, and didn't get a response)
>> 
>> Shouldn't things passed be on some kind of followup list?  I expect if I go through past minutes I will find many such items.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161014/c1207be3/attachment-0002.html>