[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-15: Censure John Moore

Sat Oct 22 18:23:01 EDT 2016

Alicia,

And that is an absolutely disjunctive comparison.

Thank you for stating that it is not anything that I have done here.

I will respond in another thread as stated. This isn't the first time
member input has been discouraged and made unwelcome - thus important
enough to pursue in its own thread.

I will post a link to the Google groups topic for future readers as it will
in one sense touch upon here - the false equivalency.

On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Caryn Ann,
>
> I have not alleged that the email campaign tactic has been used on THIS
> motion.  Mike Shipley is the only person outside the LNC who has contacted
> me on this issue, and my comments about that tactic were made before I
> received his email.
>
> I am comparing a tactic that has been used to try to influence the LNC on
> other topics with what we're being told by others was allegedly Assemblyman
> Moore's motivation.
>
> -Alicia
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
> carynannharlos at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Alicia, thank you for your thorough reply. Though one point touched upon
>> this Moore situation, in all I think it a tangent we both went on, so I
>> will respond in a fresh thread so as not to distract here.
>>
>> But I need to get something really clear here as it has been alleged two
>> times, and it is not correct.  *I categorically did not have any email
>> campaign to have anyone write anyone about this motion, * so I would
>> appreciate it if that was not said.  A member wrote me prior to my motion,
>> and I advised him to contact his regional representative as he was not in
>> my region.  After that, region 1 members indicated their desire, and I
>> heard from a Nevada board member.  All I did on this, is what I do on *every
>> single item of business before the LNC*, I post a notice in several
>> groups with a link to the discussion.  My encouragements for members to
>> write *are general and ongoing and not tied to any specific matter of
>> business* with few exceptions - those being the Motion to Rescind as
>> their rights were being violated.
>>
>> I have been at outreach and sign waving all day.  I will respond to your
>> email later tonight in a new thread when I am refreshed.
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Whitney, it was a request, specially worded so in the resolution, not a
>>> demand.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','planning4liberty at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it's an interesting question as to whether or not the motion as
>>>> presented is divisible, and I'm unclear as to the proposed division.
>>>> Regardless, the bigger issue is that it is basically impossible to handle
>>>> division of the question by email ballot, leading me to believe it is out
>>>> of order on an email ballot.
>>>>
>>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Whitney Bilyeu <whitneycb76 at gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','whitneycb76 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alicia,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it appropriate/allowable to move to divide this motion?
>>>>> 1) Censure
>>>>> 2) Call for refund/reimbursement/restitution
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the rest of the language in the last two paragraphs, I could do
>>>>> without it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Arvin Vohra <votevohra at gmail.com
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','votevohra at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I vote yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A libertarian elected official's duty is to cut government. That's
>>>>>> it. Not to support the tyranny of a misled majority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Arvin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>>>>> carynannharlos at gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sean - hats off to you. <slow clap>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree completely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Brett Bittner <brett.bittner at lp.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I intend to vote on this matter, however I do not intend to do so
>>>>>>>> until we've heard from Assemblyman Moore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Brett C. Bittner
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Region 3 Representative
>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> brett.bittner at lp.org
>>>>>>>> 317.643.2566
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **This message sent from my phone. Please excuse any typos.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2016 08:44, "Sam Goldstein" <goldsteinatlarge at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I vote Yes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This would have been one of the best opportunities to vote on
>>>>>>>>> principle and to make
>>>>>>>>> a major impact on big government that the LP has had in our
>>>>>>>>> history and Mr. Moore
>>>>>>>>> failed miserably.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>> Member at Large
>>>>>>>>> 8925 N Meridian St, Ste 101
>>>>>>>>> Indianapolis IN 46260
>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Phone
>>>>>>>>> 317-582-1773 Fax
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Patrick McKnight <
>>>>>>>>> patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I vote yes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick McKnight
>>>>>>>>>> Region 8 Rep
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2016 8:14 AM, "David Demarest" <
>>>>>>>>>> dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Alicia. I agree that the death penalty deserves a
>>>>>>>>>>> separate email thread of its own. I also was not aware of the numbers on
>>>>>>>>>>> the death penalty plank vote. Nevertheless, I would consider 364 to 105
>>>>>>>>>>> overwhelming but disappointingly not high enough considering the moral
>>>>>>>>>>> implications as spelled in the full text of my testimony as follows, which,
>>>>>>>>>>> by the way, turned out to be an extraordinary opportunity to publicize the
>>>>>>>>>>> LP in Nebraska:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> “Mr. Secretary,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> David Pratt Demarest, 10812 Park Meadow Plaza #133, Omaha, NE
>>>>>>>>>>> 68142
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am Secretary of the Libertarian Party of Nebraska and Regional
>>>>>>>>>>> Representative on the Libertarian National Committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am here today as a private Nebraska citizen to support the
>>>>>>>>>>> retention of LB268 that repealed the Nebraska death penalty as confirmed by
>>>>>>>>>>> the override of the Governor’s veto. However, I can tell you that Libertarians
>>>>>>>>>>> overwhelmingly support the repeal of the death penalty not only for
>>>>>>>>>>> practical reasons but more importantly for moral reasons. I am personally
>>>>>>>>>>> aware of *NO* Libertarians in Nebraska or across the nation
>>>>>>>>>>> that support the death penalty.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Much evidence has been presented today demonstrates the
>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable failure of the death penalty as a deterrent compounded by the
>>>>>>>>>>> financial burden it imposes on taxpayers and the extended pain and
>>>>>>>>>>> suffering it visits on victims. To add insult to injury, victims lose twice
>>>>>>>>>>> and end up revisiting the pain, anguish and suffering with no closure
>>>>>>>>>>> because of the undue focus on deterrence, punishment and vengeance on the
>>>>>>>>>>> perpetrators instead of seeking restitution for the victims. The immoral
>>>>>>>>>>> use of the death penalty to obtain false confessions was dramatically
>>>>>>>>>>> illustrated by the infamous Nebraska Beatrice 6 case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am here, however, to speak to the overriding moral issue. In
>>>>>>>>>>> addition to the barbaric nature of state-sponsored killing, the risk of
>>>>>>>>>>> predictable executions of some innocents is beyond morally unacceptable, it
>>>>>>>>>>> is unconscionable! Further, the possibility of the death penalty being used
>>>>>>>>>>> as a *political football* to obtain reelection votes raises a
>>>>>>>>>>> host of ethical questions. To those who might be tempted to
>>>>>>>>>>> advocate the death penalty for political purposes, you need to reexamine
>>>>>>>>>>> your conscience and your political, personal and moral priorities
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To voters in the audience, I urge you vote your conscience, vote
>>>>>>>>>>> to “Retain” LB268 and vote to uphold the death penalty ban in Nebraska. It
>>>>>>>>>>> is not just practical. It is the only moral choice!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have been selected for poll worker duty. I have to vote early
>>>>>>>>>>> and have already voted. I am proud to tell you that I voted to retain LB268
>>>>>>>>>>> to ban the death penalty from Nebraska. I hope you will too!”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] *On
>>>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of *Alicia Mattson
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:15 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-15: Censure
>>>>>>>>>>> John Moore
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> DD>> In the introduction to my testimony, I mentioned my
>>>>>>>>>>> positions with the LNC and the LPNE and I said that while I was there to
>>>>>>>>>>> testify as a private citizen, Libertarians are overwhelmingly against the
>>>>>>>>>>> death penalty and that I was personally aware of no Libertarians in
>>>>>>>>>>> Nebraska or across the nation that support the death penalty. <<DD
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not to change the subject or start a debate on the death
>>>>>>>>>>> penalty...just addressing a factual detail that came up in the example
>>>>>>>>>>> situation.  At the national convention there was a counted vote on the
>>>>>>>>>>> adoption of our death penalty plank, and there were 364 in favor and 105
>>>>>>>>>>> opposed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alicia
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:44 AM, David Demarest <
>>>>>>>>>>> dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will delay my vote until we hear from John Moore. It may be
>>>>>>>>>>> that merely offering the motion to censure will achieve our intended
>>>>>>>>>>> purpose to express our outrage. In the meantime, however, we need to
>>>>>>>>>>> consider Ken’s salient point about taking into account an elected
>>>>>>>>>>> official’s duty to represent the views of his constituents and the
>>>>>>>>>>> articulate responses by Caryn and Alicia.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I must say I am bothered by the reference to the 60% of
>>>>>>>>>>> constituents favoring the position that Assemblyman Moore voted for as
>>>>>>>>>>> justification for his misguided votes. As Caryn has correctly pointed out,
>>>>>>>>>>> we have a duty to reflect the principles of our party. More importantly, we
>>>>>>>>>>> have a duty to reflect our personal principles of conscience that hopefully
>>>>>>>>>>> are reasonably consistent with our party’s principles. Even allowing for
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that no two Libertarians are going to agree on all details of all
>>>>>>>>>>> principles, Assemblyman Moore’s votes go beyond the pale. Here is a recent
>>>>>>>>>>> example from my personal experience on the cronyism evils of basing
>>>>>>>>>>> political positions and votes on the consensus of constituents regardless
>>>>>>>>>>> of any considerations of principles and morals.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Last week I testified against the Nebraska referendum to
>>>>>>>>>>> reinstate the death penalty at a legally mandated District 2 hearing. The
>>>>>>>>>>> Unicameral, with the support of Libertarian Senator Laura Ebke, narrowly
>>>>>>>>>>> overrode Governor Ricketts’ veto of the bill that repealed the death
>>>>>>>>>>> penalty. Governor Ricketts then used a “substantial” contribution from his
>>>>>>>>>>> personal fortune to sponsor the ballot referendum to reinstate the death
>>>>>>>>>>> penalty that was the subject of the hearing. In the introduction to my
>>>>>>>>>>> testimony, I mentioned my positions with the LNC and the LPNE and I said
>>>>>>>>>>> that while I was there to testify as a private citizen, Libertarians are
>>>>>>>>>>> overwhelmingly against the death penalty and that I was personally aware of
>>>>>>>>>>> no Libertarians in Nebraska or across the nation that support the death
>>>>>>>>>>> penalty.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Republican State Senator Merv Riepe, a Ralston High School
>>>>>>>>>>> classmate of mine, testified that his opinion poll showed that his
>>>>>>>>>>> constituents favored the reinstatement of the death penalty *three
>>>>>>>>>>> to one* with the clear inference that he intended to reflect
>>>>>>>>>>> his constituents’ views [regardless of any moral considerations]. I looked
>>>>>>>>>>> Senator Riepe squarely in the eye and responded with the following
>>>>>>>>>>> passionate testimony:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> “… the possibility of the death penalty being used as a *political
>>>>>>>>>>> football* to obtain reelection votes raises a host of ethical
>>>>>>>>>>> questions. To those who might be tempted to advocate the death
>>>>>>>>>>> penalty for political purposes, you need to reexamine your
>>>>>>>>>>> conscience and your political, personal and moral priorities.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The point is that reflecting the “consensus of the constituents”
>>>>>>>>>>> for obvious reelection purposes is not an acceptable or moral justification
>>>>>>>>>>> for Assemblyman Moore’s two egregious votes. Let’s see what Moore has to
>>>>>>>>>>> say but keep in mind that our duty is not only to our party’s principles
>>>>>>>>>>> but also to our personal principles.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] *On
>>>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of *Alicia Mattson
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2016 1:19 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-15: Censure
>>>>>>>>>>> John Moore
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am as upset as the rest of you about the two votes in
>>>>>>>>>>> question, but that doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to vote yes on this
>>>>>>>>>>> motion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Particularly on the stadium vote, Assemblyman Moore held the
>>>>>>>>>>> power of the deciding vote.  Had he voted no, it would have failed instead
>>>>>>>>>>> of passing.  We had a Libertarian in a position to make a big real-world
>>>>>>>>>>> difference, and it didn't happen.  Facepalm.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> IF it's true that his motivation was to play to his constituency
>>>>>>>>>>> in hopes of getting re-elected, I wonder how he will feel about the votes
>>>>>>>>>>> in hindsight in the event that he is not re-elected.  What's the point of
>>>>>>>>>>> being there if you can't vote your conscience?  That's why on the LNC I
>>>>>>>>>>> also vote the way I think I ought to vote even if other LNC members stage
>>>>>>>>>>> organized email campaigns from their friends.  Should we be offended at a
>>>>>>>>>>> public official playing to his constituents if we do the same thing as
>>>>>>>>>>> party officials?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have several issues with this motion.  I particularly
>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate Mr. Moellman's questions, and I think we probably should have
>>>>>>>>>>> had a conversation with Mr. Moore before we flung a motion into the wind.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it's sufficient to just hear how other people represent his
>>>>>>>>>>> position to us.  We should get it straight from him.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am not thrilled about the wording in this resolution.
>>>>>>>>>>> "...convey a strong message to all and sundry..." ?  Who talks like that?
>>>>>>>>>>> We're discouraging others from switching to the LP until they completely
>>>>>>>>>>> agree with us?  With which of us?  Because we don't all agree, either.  I
>>>>>>>>>>> probably would have added that his vote was effectively the deciding vote.
>>>>>>>>>>> Etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Censure is an action taken by a group against a member of that
>>>>>>>>>>> same group.  Mr. Moore is not a member of the LNC.  Have we even confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>> that he's a member of the national party?  As of the national convention in
>>>>>>>>>>> May, our records did not yet indicate he had signed our membership
>>>>>>>>>>> certification.  We know he switched his party registration in NV, but that
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't make him a member of the national party.  We wouldn't censure
>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton because they're not members of the LNC or
>>>>>>>>>>> even the LP.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The state affiliate that nominated him has already censured him,
>>>>>>>>>>> so what does this accomplish for the LNC to pile on?  We can't make him
>>>>>>>>>>> return the money.  Is it just to make ourselves feel better?  Is the LNC
>>>>>>>>>>> going to become the purity police that monitors every local/state/federal
>>>>>>>>>>> elected official and passes resolutions about them?  I am concerned about
>>>>>>>>>>> starting such a trend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If we hadn't already donated the funds, I'd vote to rescind that
>>>>>>>>>>> decision.  That ship has sailed.  I wouldn't vote to donate to him again.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not certain that this motion accomplishes anything productive.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alicia
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alicia Mattson <
>>>>>>>>>>> agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have an electronic mail ballot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by October 31, 2016 at
>>>>>>>>>>> 11:59:59pm Pacific time.*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Co-Sponsors:*  Harlos, Demarest, Hayes, Vohra, Starchild,
>>>>>>>>>>> Goldstein, Redpath
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Motion:*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whereas Nevada Assemblyman John Moore, a former Republican who
>>>>>>>>>>> in January 2016 switched to the Libertarian Party while in office, has
>>>>>>>>>>> during the past month voted not once but twice in the span of as many days
>>>>>>>>>>> to raise taxes on his constituents, including a vote to support a "More
>>>>>>>>>>> Cops" tax which the Libertarian Party of Nevada has tirelessly and thus far
>>>>>>>>>>> successfully opposed, and a vote to provide a $750 million subsidy to
>>>>>>>>>>> finance a billionaire-owned sports stadium at the expense of, among others,
>>>>>>>>>>> indigent persons renting weekly rooms in motels; and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whereas the elected leaders of our state affiliate party in
>>>>>>>>>>> Nevada have rightfully voted to censure Assemblyman Moore for these
>>>>>>>>>>> egregious votes; and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whereas we wish to convey a strong message to all and sundry
>>>>>>>>>>> that while we welcome sitting legislators in the Republican or Democrat
>>>>>>>>>>> parties who decide to switch to the Libertarian Party as an act of
>>>>>>>>>>> conscience, we do not welcome them if they intend, as members of our party,
>>>>>>>>>>> to continue voting and acting like Republicans or Democrats;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore be it resolved that the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> hereby censures Assemblyman Moore for his recent votes in support of tax
>>>>>>>>>>> increases, requests that he return the $10,000 campaign contribution which
>>>>>>>>>>> the LNC this season voted to send him, and admonishes him to henceforward
>>>>>>>>>>> be a better champion of the values held by members of the political party
>>>>>>>>>>> with which he has chosen to affiliate if he intends to remain a Libertarian.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alicia
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>>>>> Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Arvin Vohra
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.VoteVohra.com
>>>>>> VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','VoteVohra at gmail.com');>
>>>>>> (301) 320-3634
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *In Liberty,*
>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>

-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161022/04312f4f/attachment-0002.html>