[Lnc-business] FB Posts
Caryn Ann Harlos
carynannharlos at gmail.com
Sat Apr 15 15:43:38 EDT 2017
I would really like to work with you all in crafting an analysis committee
with well-thought out proposals for August.
*Something needs to change. *I think everyone agrees on that.
I wish emotions didn't get so high- I think ultimately we want the same
thing. And have the same very deep concerns.
-Caryn Ann
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Patrick McKnight <
patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com> wrote:
> Whitney,
>
> I agree with your sentiments. I'm slightly more inclined to take action
> now but everything you say is true.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick McKnight
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Whitney Bilyeu <whitneycb76 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> My issues are with the (perceived) 'authority' that volunteers have over
>> our messaging on FB. Also, I don't care to burden staff members with a task
>> that is not necessarily their specialty.
>>
>> I value the contributions and the creativity of the volunteers who put
>> that material out, and I believe they do it better than our limited staff
>> could do. However, I do not agree that volunteers should have the final say
>> when it comes messages that we LNC members are on the hook for.
>>
>> The motion presented today was too restrictive, and oddly, at the same
>> time a little ambiguous. It could have put our entire social media presence
>> on hold. I am also concerned about the risk of losing those volunteers as a
>> result of such an action.
>>
>> Yes, we need an intervention, and a temporary policy, along with a
>> steering committee, could be the answer. But, we could have just brought
>> our social media action to a screeching halt, and that is not what we
>> really want.
>>
>> How about establishing a policy that includes staff or LNC members in
>> posting approval, and holds the APRC more accountable, as well?
>>
>> I want to see a policy that establishes/clarifies the authority of the FB
>> admins, moderators, and posters (who are not staff members). I also would
>> like to establish specific guidelines for what is put out...in order to
>> avoid these kinds of pitfalls and distractions in the future. Ideally, we
>> won't put anything out there that causes people to resign their posts, or
>> cease donations.
>>
>> Whitney
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170415/89165283/attachment-0005.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list